Veljko writes:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:20:04PM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
>> I have tried to reproduce the problem as well but my Xorg's memory usage
>> stayed constant (about 50M), iceweasel's memory usage went from 180M to
>> 900M during the test. I used a periodic ps invocation to get the dat
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:20:04PM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
> I have tried to reproduce the problem as well but my Xorg's memory usage
> stayed constant (about 50M), iceweasel's memory usage went from 180M to
> 900M during the test. I used a periodic ps invocation to get the data
> pasted to http://
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> staticsafe writes:
>
> > I don't think this is an Xorg issue, just tried the webpage you
> > suggested on Firefox in Windows 7, same issue, rapid memory usage
> > growth. Seems more like a Firefox issue, can you try a Nightly [0] bu
On 05/28/2013 10:42 AM, Veljko wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>> And what about the version numbers for iceweasel and firefox?
>
> Debian:
> iceweasel -v
> Mozilla Iceweasel 10.0.12
$ Mozilla Iceweasel 20.0
>> It seems that iceweasel is storing all image
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> staticsafe writes:
>
> > I don't think this is an Xorg issue, just tried the webpage you
> > suggested on Firefox in Windows 7, same issue, rapid memory usage
> > growth. Seems more like a Firefox issue, can you try a Nightly [0] bu
staticsafe writes:
> I don't think this is an Xorg issue, just tried the webpage you
> suggested on Firefox in Windows 7, same issue, rapid memory usage
> growth. Seems more like a Firefox issue, can you try a Nightly [0] build
> and see if the issue still exists?
I guess the problem is not firef
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:42:55AM +0200, Veljko wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> > And what about the version numbers for iceweasel and firefox?
>
> Debian:
> iceweasel -v
> Mozilla Iceweasel 10.0.12
>
> Slackware:
> firefox -v
> Mozilla Firefox 21.0
>
Veljko writes:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>> And what about the version numbers for iceweasel and firefox?
>
> Debian:
> iceweasel -v
> Mozilla Iceweasel 10.0.12
>
> Slackware:
> firefox -v
> Mozilla Firefox 21.0
>
> Firefox I downloaded from mozilla.org and
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> And what about the version numbers for iceweasel and firefox?
Debian:
iceweasel -v
Mozilla Iceweasel 10.0.12
Slackware:
firefox -v
Mozilla Firefox 21.0
Firefox I downloaded from mozilla.org and I started on Debian:
./firefox-bin -
Veljko writes:
> This is really weird as both Debian and Slackware use same xorg:
>
> dpkg -l |grep xserver-xorg-core
> ii xserver-xorg-core 2:1.12.4-6 amd64 Xorg X server - core server
>
>
> ls /var/log/packages/ |grep xorg-server
> xorg-server-1.12.4-x86_64-1_slack14.0
>
And what about the ver
On 05/27/2013 11:57 AM, Veljko wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:49:19PM +0200, Veljko wrote:
>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Veljko wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I don't know if this is bug, but when I visit some thumblr blogs that have
>>> endless scrolling (like google images search),
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:49:19PM +0200, Veljko wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Veljko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I don't know if this is bug, but when I visit some thumblr blogs that have
> > endless scrolling (like google images search), it is expected that Iceweasel
> > eats
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Veljko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know if this is bug, but when I visit some thumblr blogs that have
> endless scrolling (like google images search), it is expected that Iceweasel
> eats lots of RAM (here are lots of pictures), but Xorg RAM usage is even
13 matches
Mail list logo
