Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and dexter

2000-12-09 Thread Rick Loga
Problem solved! I found in the old 3.3.6 XFree86 FAQ a reference to a program called SuperProbe which told me my video chipset is a Cirrus 5464 which is one of the options on the dexter configurator. --- Rick Loga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >I updated woody which is now Xfree4 and the this

Re: Matrox, X4 and potato (was: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 packages and Potato)

2000-12-06 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:57:05AM +0100, Erik Noort wrote: > > Hmm, according to the documentation 3.3.6 only supports the G200, so if > you've got it working please tell me how... i have a G400 i have been using with XFree 3.3.6 for a long time with no problems. i use the SVGA server. here

Re: Matrox, X4 and potato (was: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 packages and Potato)

2000-12-06 Thread Erik Noort
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Rogerio Brito wrote: > On Dec 05 2000, Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote: > > Indeed, if you get it to work, PLEASE tell me too, 'cause I've been > > trying for days now, to no aval. > > What exactly is your problem? A while back, I got a G400 to > work with packages

Matrox, X4 and potato (was: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 packages and Potato)

2000-12-05 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Dec 05 2000, Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote: > Indeed, if you get it to work, PLEASE tell me too, 'cause I've been > trying for days now, to no aval. What exactly is your problem? A while back, I got a G400 to work with packages from woody (X 4.0.1-7, if I remember correct

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 packages and Potato

2000-12-05 Thread Frederik Vanrenterghem
On 5 Dec 2000, mikpolniak wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:45:28 +0100 (CET), Erik Noort said: > > > I'm wondering how things are standing with XFree86 4.0.1 packages for > > Debian 2.2 (Potato). I've noticed that they are already available for > > Woody, but not for Potato. I've tried to com

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 packages and Potato

2000-12-05 Thread mikpolniak
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:45:28 +0100 (CET), Erik Noort said: > Hiya > > I'm wondering how things are standing with XFree86 4.0.1 packages for > Debian 2.2 (Potato). I've noticed that they are already available for > Woody, but not for Potato. I've tried to compile the woody source package, > b

Re: XFree86 4.0.1

2000-11-28 Thread Martin Fluch
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Unpacking replacement xutils ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xutils_4.0.1- > 8_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/X11R6/bin/bdftopcf', > which is also in package xbase-clients > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by si

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and Matrox G200

2000-11-27 Thread Jeffrey A Schoolcraft
I thought so, and I tried that last night after I posted this message. It allowed me to start my X server but enlightenment complained that it was too primitive to perform certain functions: This X server does not support the shape function. This is required for enlightenment to run. Your X se

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and Matrox G200

2000-11-26 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 11:07:11PM -0500, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft wrote: > Recently did an upgrade to woody and X4.0.1 and lost my configs. If > anyone knows the driver name used for the Matrox G200 (I think mga > something), please let me know. I'm stuck in console mode until I > figure that out.

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-12 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 02:24:01PM +0100, Andrea Vettorello wrote: > Marc Wilson wrote: > > > [...] > > > > It really is just that simple. I had zero luck getting xfstt to cooperate > > with XF4, and had all sorts of weird font-isms until I disabled it. Aterm > > would display hash instead of li

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and kernel 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-12 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
msg.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-12 Thread Andrea Vettorello
Marc Wilson wrote: > [...] > > It really is just that simple. I had zero luck getting xfstt to cooperate > with XF4, and had all sorts of weird font-isms until I disabled it. Aterm > would display hash instead of line-drawing characters, rxvt wouldn't even > START, Eterm would start, but not d

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and kernel 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-12 Thread James Dietrich
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 09:39:18AM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > > Hi. > > :: Guenter Bechly writes: > > >> Anybody else having trouble with this combination? While running > >> 2.4.0-test10, startx hangs after showing a plain gray screen sometime > >> before completing successfully. At

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and kernel 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-12 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
Hi. :: Guenter Bechly writes: >> Anybody else having trouble with this combination? While running >> 2.4.0-test10, startx hangs after showing a plain gray screen sometime >> before completing successfully. At that point the system reponds to >> neither Ctrl-Alt-Backspace nor Ctrl-Alt-Fn, so I

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and kernel 2.4.0-test10

2000-11-12 Thread Dr. Guenter Bechly
msg.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: XFree86 4.0.1

2000-11-08 Thread mheyes
failed. Thanks, Michael Heyes Brian Stults <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/07/2000 02:43:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org cc: Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded XFree86 yesterday to 4.0.1 and had several problems i

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 crashes hard

2000-11-07 Thread Jeremy Hankins
Marcelo Ramos said: > > Jeremy Hankins wrote: > > > But when I run xinit to test it the the machine crashes hard. > > > Console doesn't respond, no response to pings, etc. > > > > > > I've tried several things: using the vga driver rather than > > > s3virge, taking out some of the modules & option

Re: XFree86 4.0.1

2000-11-07 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
:: mheyes writes: > Hi, > I upgraded XFree86 yesterday to 4.0.1 and had several problems in > WindowMaker with the color mapping, ie can't find "black", "white" etc and > I'd like to go back to 3.3.6 for awhile until things settle down. I > downgraded xserver-common, removed the new xserver for 4

Re: XFree86 4.0.1

2000-11-07 Thread Brian Stults
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I upgraded XFree86 yesterday to 4.0.1 and had several problems in WindowMaker with the color mapping, ie can't find "black", "white" etc and I had this problem, too. It was because the file /etc/X11/rgb.txt was blank. I took a valid one from another installatio

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 crashes hard

2000-11-07 Thread Mike
Brad wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 08:10:23PM -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > > > > I've got an s3 virge card, viewsonic monitor. Come the upgrade to > > XF 4.0 I've got to re-create the XF86Config file -- no biggy, I ran > > xf86config to get a base version, and tweaked it to fit. > > Same he

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 crashes hard

2000-11-06 Thread Brad
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 08:10:23PM -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > > I've got an s3 virge card, viewsonic monitor. Come the upgrade to > XF 4.0 I've got to re-create the XF86Config file -- no biggy, I ran > xf86config to get a base version, and tweaked it to fit. Same here: S3 Virge/DX, different

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 crashes hard

2000-11-06 Thread Marcelo Ramos
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:19:13AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote: > Jeremy Hankins wrote: > > But when I run xinit to test it the the machine crashes hard. Console > > doesn't respond, no response to pings, etc. > > > > I've tried several things: using the vga driver rather than s3virge, > > taking ou

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 crashes hard

2000-11-06 Thread Erik Steffl
Jeremy Hankins wrote: > > Well, I've been futzing with this for a couple days now, and no luck, so > I'll see if anyone here has any suggestions. > > I've got an s3 virge card, viewsonic monitor. Come the upgrade to > XF 4.0 I've got to re-create the XF86Config file -- no biggy, I ran > xf86conf

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-06 Thread Erik Steffl
"John S. J. Anderson" wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > "Marc Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It's not all that hard... I went through this last night. > > Well, yah, it shouldn't have been. 8^/= I was doing the right thing, > and for some reason, it wasn'

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and gdm

2000-11-05 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1, and I can't log in using gdm any more (I'm > using the Helix version). From what I can tell, the X packages have a new > /etc/X11/Xsession file which gdm doesn't like very much. Has anyone noticed > this problem too? An

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-05 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
"John S. J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > wulfie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ttmkfdir in the ttf dir :) Add the path to your fonts section in > > XF86Config, freetype to the modules section (you already did both, it > > seems) & you're there. > > What's the exact path to ttmkfdir

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-05 Thread John S. J. Anderson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 "Marc Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not all that hard... I went through this last night. Well, yah, it shouldn't have been. 8^/= I was doing the right thing, and for some reason, it wasn't working. Then, it started working. I'm not sure

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-05 Thread Joey Hess
wulfie wrote: > It would make sense if ttmkfdir was included with freetype, but it appears > not to be. fttools has mkttfdir, which works -- see shy jo

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-05 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 11:03:55AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > It really is just that simple. I had zero luck getting xfstt to cooperate > with XF4, and had all sorts of weird font-isms until I disabled it. Aterm > would display hash instead of line-drawing characters, rxvt wouldn't even > START,

RE: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-05 Thread Marc Wilson
- Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.moonkingdom.net/mwilson -Original Message- From: John S. J. Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 10:31 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and True

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and Voodoo3 -- how do I test?

2000-11-05 Thread Adam Lazur
Thomas J. Hamman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Okay, I have the latest 2.4.0 test kernel compiled with DRI and the 3dfx > driver, I have XFree86 4.0.1 running fine > > Now how do I even find out if I have 3D hardware acceleration working? Check out dri.sourceforge.net .adam -- [

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-05 Thread wulfie
http://www.mindspring.com/~john_mcl/adding_fonts.html This is not XF4-specific but does give a good guide to getting ttfs running in X in general, plus all the required tools can be downloaded in a single tarball. It would make sense if ttmkfdir was included with freetype, but it appears not to be.

Re: X4 and a Trident Card? (was: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts)

2000-11-05 Thread John S. J. Anderson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rogerio Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Nov 04 2000, John S. J. Anderson wrote: > > Once I got it working, however, I was quite impressed. It's > > noticeably faster than XFree 3.3.6 on window movement and screen > > redraws, even with the old

X4 and a Trident Card? (was: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts)

2000-11-04 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Nov 04 2000, John S. J. Anderson wrote: > Once I got it working, however, I was quite impressed. It's > noticeably faster than XFree 3.3.6 on window movement and screen > redraws, even with the old 4 MB Trident card I've got. Old Trident Card? Hey, which one? We may be in the same boat.

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-04 Thread John S. J. Anderson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 wulfie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ttmkfdir in the ttf dir :) Add the path to your fonts section in > XF86Config, freetype to the modules section (you already did both, it > seems) & you're there. What's the exact path to ttmkfdir on your box? I do

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 and TrueType fonts

2000-11-04 Thread wulfie
ttmkfdir in the ttf dir :) Add the path to your fonts section in XF86Config, freetype to the modules section (you already did both, it seems) & you're there. == Paul Sims ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) SpireLUG - the Chesterfield Linux User Group www.spirelug.o

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 in woody?

2000-10-11 Thread David Z Maze
Andreas Tscharner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AT> I wonder when XFree86 4.0.1 comes into woody. It'll be in when the X maintainer decides that his packages are stable enough for general use. My impression is that their current state isn't particularly usable unless you're willing to do significa

RE: XFree86 4.0.1

2000-10-10 Thread Matthew Sherborne
> Anyone happen to know what's going on with Branden's package archive? > Err http://samosa.debian.org woody/i386/ xserver-common 4.0.1-0phase2v13 > 404 Not Found I think the url is wrong? Souldn't have spaces... http://samosa.debian.org/woody/i386/xserver-common 4.0.1-0phase2v13 Matthew

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 from source

2000-08-01 Thread John Gould
Hi there, You can actually install the XFree4.0.1 release from the binaries on the XFree86.org site. All works like a dream, you don't need to compile from source! However it screws up the package management of course! But so does compiling from source! Also I suggest that one runs 'update

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 from source

2000-07-31 Thread Nicole Zimmerman
I have a r128 (and a matrox mga) w/xfree 4.0.1 also, I too see these errors every time I startx. It's actually comforting to hear someone else having the same problem ;o) It is *definitely* nice to see the performance increase on the rage128, it is also much improved for 4.0.1 than just flat 4.0.

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 from source

2000-07-31 Thread Ashley Clark
* Dave Wilk in "XFree86 4.0.1 from source" dated 2000/07/31 18:51 * wrote: > Howdy folks, > > I successfully compiled XFree 4.0.1 from source with some very > helpful suggestions from a /. post. I've compiled alot of source, > but never anything this big. anyway, it went fine, everything in > /

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 from source

2000-07-31 Thread iehrenwald
> Could not init font path element /usr/local/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/, > removing from list! > Could not init font path element /usr/local/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, > removing from list! I did the same thing you did and I get those same errors. It doesn't seem to hurt anything so I always i

Re: Xfree86-4.0.1 and Enlightenment

2000-07-28 Thread Robert L. Harris
I had the same problem. It turned out I needed -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 135336 Jul 2 06:31 libextmod.a in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extentsions, and then: then I had to update /etc/X11/XF86Config: Section "Module" Load"dbe" # Double buffer extension #SubSection "

Re: Xfree86 4.0.1

2000-07-16 Thread Markus Fischer
The xfree86 maintainer's website [1] clearly states why no debs are available, when they will get available and for whom they are made available in the first instance. kind regards, Markus [1] http://www.debian.org/~branden/ -- Markus Fischer, http://josefine.ben.tuwien.ac.at/~

Re: Xfree86 4.0.1

2000-07-15 Thread Corey Popelier
No debs yet - a few people report installing from the binaries quite happily, and I know a couple of people who compiled source and got it working too. Lazy me is waiting for the debs :) Cheers, Corey J. Popelier http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, geek. wrote: > A

Re: Xfree86 4.0.1

2000-07-05 Thread Mike Werner
Corey Popelier wrote: > Hrm. > I jumped the gun, assuming the fact that my apt-get -s upgrade this > morning wanted to do an X upgrade. It appears its just gone from 3.3.6-8 > to 3.3.6-9. S'alright. I got a bit excited myself when I saw the XFree packages being upgraded when I did my last dist-up

Re: Xfree86 4.0.1

2000-07-05 Thread Corey Popelier
Hrm. I jumped the gun, assuming the fact that my apt-get -s upgrade this morning wanted to do an X upgrade. It appears its just gone from 3.3.6-8 to 3.3.6-9. Excuse me whilst I pop out and shoot myself. Cheers, Corey Popelier http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Xfree86 4.0.1

2000-07-05 Thread Mike Werner
Corey Popelier wrote: > I see this is now debbed in woody, anyone done the upgrade from 3.3.6 > yet? Any problems? Where did you see this? I just did an apt-get update, and the X versions are still at 3.3.6 -- Mike Werner KA8YSD | "Where do you want to go today?"