On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 10:20:15PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> isnt mouseless X pointless, or shouldnt that be pointerless...
There's a neat trick you can use if you don't have a mouse or your mouse
breaks: hit Shift-NumLock and the cursor keys on your numeric keypad
will become a substitute
29.12.2002 23:20:15, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>isnt mouseless X pointless, or shouldnt that be pointerless...
>
>Regards, Dean.
Not for me. I admit that I have a mouse attached and fully functional,
but I avoid touching it as much as possible. (Well of course to limited
success as soon as it ge
29.12.2002 19:26:30, "Matthew Daubenspeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hal Vaughan said:
>> 2) Does anyone know how X behaves if it is looking for the mouse on the
>> wrong port? Does it not start, start w/out a mouse, keep restarting
>> until it finds the mouse, or what?
>
>It will fail to sta
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 01:29:24PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> Two mouse questions:
>
> 1) Can someone confirm for me (I'm having strange troubles, again...) that if
> I have a mouse port (ATX mobo w/ keyboard and mouse ports above each other),
> that it is configured as /dev/psaux (no serial c
Hal Vaughan said:
> 2) Does anyone know how X behaves if it is looking for the mouse on the
> wrong port? Does it not start, start w/out a mouse, keep restarting
> until it finds the mouse, or what?
It will fail to start, and you will see a message about not being able to
initialize a mouse...
5 matches
Mail list logo