Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-08 Thread Andrei Popescu
Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 14:40 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:47:52AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > > > pinniped wrote: > > > > > > > >huh? > > > > > > > >I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've > > > >b

Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-08 Thread Freddy Freeloader
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 14:40 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:47:52AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > > pinniped wrote: > > > > > >huh? > > > > > >I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've been > > >leaving the subject blank lately because people bitch abo

Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-08 Thread Kevin Mark
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:47:52AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote: > pinniped wrote: > > > >huh? > > > >I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've been > >leaving the subject blank lately because people bitch about it for no > >apparent reason. But if you really don't want the

Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-08 Thread Freddy Freeloader
pinniped wrote: huh? I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've been leaving the subject blank lately because people bitch about it for no apparent reason. But if you really don't want the subject changing, why don't you ask Intnsred if he can set things so that the subje

Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-08 Thread Michael Pobega
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 03:25:54PM +1000, Greg Vickers wrote: > Hi all, > > Michael Pobega wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:34:08AM +0100, pinniped wrote: > >>I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've been > >>leaving the subject blank lately because people bitch about it

Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-07 Thread Greg Vickers
Hi all, Michael Pobega wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:34:08AM +0100, pinniped wrote: huh? I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've been leaving the subject blank lately because people bitch about it for no apparent reason. But if you really don't want the subject cha

Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-07 Thread Michael Pobega
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:34:08AM +0100, pinniped wrote: > > huh? > > I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've been leaving > the subject blank lately because people bitch about it for no apparent > reason. But if you really don't want the subject changing, why don't you

Re: Worse then useless replies

2007-03-07 Thread pinniped
huh? I really don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've been leaving the subject blank lately because people bitch about it for no apparent reason. But if you really don't want the subject changing, why don't you ask Intnsred if he can set things so that the subject isn't changed?

Re: Worse then useless replies (was Re: Use 'apt-get dist-upgrade'.)

2007-03-07 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:14:40 -0500 Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:08:29AM -0500, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > > On 3/7/07, pinniped <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Use 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Even this will not necessarily be > > successful > > on

Re: Filtering (was Re: Worse then useless replies)

2007-03-07 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:45:47 -0800 Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Raquel wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:14:40 -0500 > > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > it seem more than a few of us regulars have tried to be 'helpful' >

Re: Filtering (was Re: Worse then useless replies)

2007-03-07 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:55:58AM -0800, Raquel wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:45:47 -0800 > Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Raquel wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:14:40 -0500 > > > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Re: Filtering (was Re: Worse then useless replies)

2007-03-07 Thread Raquel
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:45:47 -0800 Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Raquel wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:14:40 -0500 > > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > it seem more than a few of us regulars have tried to be > > > 'helpf

Re: Filtering (was Re: Worse then useless replies)

2007-03-07 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Raquel wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:14:40 -0500 > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it seem more than a few of us regulars have tried to be 'helpful' > > and he/she seems to think this mail list reply method _is_ > > helpful. Not much more we can

Filtering (was Re: Worse then useless replies)

2007-03-07 Thread Raquel
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:14:40 -0500 Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:08:29AM -0500, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > > On 3/7/07, pinniped <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Use 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Even this will not necessarily > > be successful on the f

Re: Worse then useless replies (was Re: Use 'apt-get dist-upgrade'.)

2007-03-07 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:08:29AM -0500, Patrick Wiseman wrote: > On 3/7/07, pinniped <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Use 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Even this will not necessarily be successful > on the first pass and you may have to run it up to 3 times. > > > Top posting is frowned on