Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-20 Thread John Hasler
James Vahn writes: > Novell, SuSE, TrollTech (KDE's Qt), SCO, Caldera. They (and more) are > all tied together though the Canopy Group. Canopy has never had any influence over Novell. Canopy once had a small interest in Troll Tech. They sold it quite a while ago. Canopy fired Yarro and severed

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-20 Thread James Vahn
Marc Shapiro wrote: > Caldera purchased some of the assets of SCO, including the SCO name. Novell, SuSE, TrollTech (KDE's Qt), SCO, Caldera. They (and more) are all tied together though the Canopy Group. I wouldn't be suprised to see Corel as another one. > SCO then renamed itself Tarantella. > C

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Greg Madden
On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:23, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 18:39 -0600]: > >On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by > >

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Marc Shapiro
Paul Johnson wrote: Patrick Wiseman wrote: On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Heard wrote: Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained suggestions as to how to solve my problem -

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread John Hasler
Patrick writes: > I can find no evidence that SCO owns Corel. The SCO Group (formerly Caldera), the company that now calls itself SCO, owns neither Corel nor WordPerfect. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Patrick Wiseman wrote:> On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Heard wrote: > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my >> > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained>> >

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Paul Johnson
Patrick Wiseman wrote: > On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ken Heard wrote: >> >> > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my >> > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained >> > suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- t

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 18:39 -0600]: >On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my > > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which conta

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Heard wrote:> Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my> request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained> suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent West and > Patrick Wiseman.WordP

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 17:58 -0600]: > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my > > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained > > suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent West and

Re: WordPerfect 8.0 considered harmful

2005-11-19 Thread Rodney D. Myers
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:10:43 -0800 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ken Heard wrote: > > > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by > > my request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained > > suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from