"Raphael Deimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Sorry, delayed reaction ...)
>From: "Scott Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 3. new installer - someone else mentioned it, but this is a definite in my
>> book
>
>called deity, imho definitely a must (dselect drives me nuts when i'm
>searching for pack
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:19:19PM +0100, Raphael Deimel wrote:
> btw. woody is unstable, so 2.4.0 will probably be the standard-kernel very
> soon
How do you come to that conclusion?
Cheers,
Tom
--
Houdini escaping from New Jersey!
Film at eleven.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: Woody Progress
> 2. Kernel 2.4 - add a couple releases after the initail release to
stabilize it
> even more
I already run Woody with 2.
>In closing, I'd like to ask another (related) question. Is there some
>particular piece of software that you think Woody is waiting for that will
>be here in a years time? GCC 3.0 perhaps?
1. GCC 3.0 - good call
2. Kernel 2.4 - add a couple releases after the initail release to stabilize it
ev
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Richard Taylor wrote:
> > > of many reasons Debian is the only linux I use.
> > > Also, those of us who read the lists understand what the reasons are, and
> > > to my mind, they were sound, but up until recently, the `man on the
> > > street'
> > > still sees us as the last
Sorry folks, my brain must have suffered a power-outage,
I have posted the preceding message to the wrong list.
Sorry.
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:31:30AM -0700, Rando Christensen wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Richard Taylor wrote:
>
> > ObDisclaimer: IANADD
> >
> > First off, I would like to apologize if this is not the right list to ask
> > this question, and secondly, I would like to apologize if it is not
> >
7 matches
Mail list logo
