On Sunday 02 November 2003 12:38, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> From: "Richard Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Saturday 01 November 2003 04:43, Kent West wrote:
[..]
> > > Chances are you have a so-called "soft-modem" (aka "winmodem"). You
> > > _might_ get it working, but it'd be a whole lote easier to j
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:11:57AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
>
> 00:03.0 Communication controller: Lucent Microelectronics WinModem 56k (rev
> 01)
Probably. Check www.linmodems.org. I set up a Lucent winmodem on a
Thinkpad a while back and it worked flawlessly the first time. The
instruction
Have a look at linmodems.org.
--- Naiara Nozella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there already driver for the modem of
> manufacturer 3Com / USRobotics,
> of 56Kbps, type V.90 Winmodem, slot ISA and model
> number 5683 ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Naiara
>
>
>
_
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Naiara Nozella wrote:
>
> Is there already driver for the modem 3Com USRobotics 56Kbps
> V.90 Winmodem ISA model number 5683 ?
A search for winmodem US Robotics on http://www.google.com/linux will give
you plenty of links that might help you a lot.
>
>
> Na
>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:55:29PM -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a driver for my LT winmodem running on 2.2.12-20 kernel.
> Now, I had compiled 2.4.5 kernel, and when I try to load the
> driver, it tells unresolved symbols, and a message saying was
> compiled for 2.2.
Gargiulo,
There is a way to fix you unresolved symbols problem
but if you truly have a winmodem made by Lucent then
you want to go to this url and it will lead you to
where you can download a .deb driver for your kernel.
linmodems.technion.ac.il
Hope that helps ya
Don
--- GARGIULO Eduardo
At 02:55 p.m. 11/07/01 -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
Hi all.
I have a driver for my LT winmodem running on 2.2.12-20 kernel.
Now, I had compiled 2.4.5 kernel, and when I try to load the
driver, it tells unresolved symbols, and a message saying was
compiled for 2.2.12-20 kernel. Is
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 07:34:24AM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote:
> > Not any more. There is now a driver available as source for this particular
> > Lucent chipset (if we talk about the same thing) used in some notebook
> > modems. It works fine here.
>
>
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 07:34:24AM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote:
> On Sunday 10 June 2001 04:41, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > There is a kernel driver for the Lucent winmodems ... it's a binary
> > only module and CPU really gets whacked when you're dialed in.
>
> Not any more. There is now a driver av
On Sunday 10 June 2001 04:41, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> There is a kernel driver for the Lucent winmodems ... it's a binary
> only module and CPU really gets whacked when you're dialed in.
Not any more. There is now a driver available as source for this particular
Lucent chipset (if we talk about
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 10:36:02PM -0400, alex wrote:
> Would it be feasible to create a software bidirectional Linux to
> Windows translator dedicated for one purpose, to permit use of any
> Winmodem on Linux?
WinModems _are_ usable in Linux ... it's just that the terms of use
are usually onerou
12/12/00 2:48:28 PM, urbanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i've heard the same thing, and from several reliable sources. with my
>system, i bought a new modem.
>
>On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Stephan Kulka wrote:
>> > Is there any possibility to configure Debian to work with "WinModem" (any
>> > drivers?)
I've heard that Lucent provides modules for their Winmodems for linux.
But again, "I've heard"...
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, urbanyon wrote:
> i've heard the same thing, and from several reliable sources. with my
> system, i bought a new modem.
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Stephan Kulka wrote:
>
> >
>
i've heard the same thing, and from several reliable sources. with my
system, i bought a new modem.
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Stephan Kulka wrote:
>
>
>
> > Is there any possibility to configure Debian to work with "WinModem" (any
> > drivers?)
> > Koz?o
>
> AFAIK "WinModems" are cripled, i.e. th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Is there any possibility to configure Debian to work with "WinModem" (any
> drivers?)
If it's a Lucent winmodem, check the information at
http://www.linmodems.org. Note that to get an inte
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Kulka wrote:
> > Is there any possibility to configure Debian to work with "WinModem" (any
> > drivers?)
> > Koz³o
>
> AFAIK "WinModems" are cripled, i.e. they only understand a part of the
> hayes standard command. I admit that I never had this pr
You can try www.linmodems.org
---
ICQ #:14518882
- Original Message -
From: "Krzysztof Kozłowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 3:08 PM
Subject: WinModem
> Is there any possibility to configure Debian to work with "WinModem" (any
> drivers?)
> Kozło
>
>
> --
>
> Is there any possibility to configure Debian to work with "WinModem" (any
> drivers?)
> Koz?o
AFAIK "WinModems" are cripled, i.e. they only understand a part of the
hayes standard command. I admit that I never had this problem and only
read about that, but it is a known problem and can only b
If it's a PCI modem, it's probably a winmodem. From the looks of things
it's a winmodem. I'd return it for two reasons. 1) It's junk and not a
real modem. 2) It'll probably never work on Linux (thank god). I had a
similar problem with a Rockwell modem someone gave me, and it turns out to
be a w
Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> You would think that now that US Robotics is owned by 3com this would
> change, as they seem to be open about the spec's on their ethernet lan
> cards.
I agree, but they probably just don't want to mess with it. Maybe once
more people use Linux
You would think that now that US Robotics is owned by 3com this would
change, as they seem to be open about the spec's on their ethernet lan
cards.
===
As evil as MS are, they are not responsible for all of the world's
problems. Blame US Robotics
On Fri, Jan 01, 1999 at 10:39:28AM -, eferen1 wrote:
>
> Hi. I had that problem too. If it's a winmodem, forget it!
>
> Get yourself a real modem. Debian people won't write a driver for it.
s/Debian/kernel/
s/won't/can't/
Trust me, if hardware specifications for this WinModem were freely
ava
Hi. I had that problem too. If it's a winmodem, forget it!
Get yourself a real modem. Debian people won't write a driver for it. MS has
a closed door policy on their code, and probably locks their developers in
it too.
Sorry.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Brent Hueth [mailto:[EM
I'm one of the lucky ones that had a winmodem and presently have a winprinter.
I read
there is a driver for winprinters. That's my nest big project trying to get the
printer working. The driver info is at:
http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/Printing-HOWTO.html
Kent
"John C. Ellingboe" wrote:
>
Unfortunately, you are.
Andrew
> I've just installed the base Debian system, and haven't been able to get
> my modem to respond so I can install the rest. I found a description of
> the problem with Winmodems (my new gateway has a "US Robotics 56K
> WinModem) in the Debian installation instruction
On Fri, 1 Jan 1999, Brent Hueth wrote:
> the problem with Winmodems (my new gateway has a "US Robotics 56K
> WinModem) in the Debian installation instructions, and am just wondering
> Brent
As in Gateway 2000? I wanted to be sure before I fired off a message
telling them they just moved down a no
Winmodems and windows printers only work with M$ windoze. The drivers
are proprietary and written only for m$ stuff.
John
Brent Hueth wrote:
>
> I've just installed the base Debian system, and haven't been able to get
> my modem to respond so I can install the rest. I found a description of
>
Thank you for your help, I thnk it's down to a chatscript problem know. I
started
doing some snooping, and I already have it on my system. I'm going to give my
ISP a
call and see if he can talk me through this over the phone, he runs Debian on
his
web servers and routers, he's a smart one.
Shal
I believe it is called isapnptools.
On 15-Oct-98 David Sherow wrote:
> Where can I get isapnp?
>
> Shaleh wrote:
>
>> Win modems are almost always made by US Robotics. You should only need to
>> type
>> "pon". You also need to ensure that you have told ppp to use the right com
>> port. If th
Thank we'll give it a try
Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> >
> >Look at the modem. If you see a UART, you don't have
> >a winmodem. ie 16550 or 8250 for old equipment.
> >
> This is not enough. Some Non-Winmodems may have the uart embedded in
> an ASIC or custom IC. If you can issue the Hayes AT command
>
>Look at the modem. If you see a UART, you don't have
>a winmodem. ie 16550 or 8250 for old equipment.
>
This is not enough. Some Non-Winmodems may have the uart embedded in
an ASIC or custom IC. If you can issue the Hayes AT command to the
port that the modem is mapped to and get a response (u
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Shaleh wrote:
: Win modems are almost always made by US Robotics. You should only need to
type
: "pon". You also need to ensure that you have told ppp to use the right com
: port. If the modem is a plug and play modem, you need to install the isapnp
: tools and follow
Where can I get isapnp?
Shaleh wrote:
> Win modems are almost always made by US Robotics. You should only need to
> type
> "pon". You also need to ensure that you have told ppp to use the right com
> port. If the modem is a plug and play modem, you need to install the isapnp
> tools and follo
Win modems are almost always made by US Robotics. You should only need to type
"pon". You also need to ensure that you have told ppp to use the right com
port. If the modem is a plug and play modem, you need to install the isapnp
tools and follow their instructions.
On 15-Oct-98 David Sherow w
Hello David:
Look at the modem. If you see a UART, you don't have
a winmodem. ie 16550 or 8250 for old equipment.
Peter
David Sherow wrote:
> How can a person tell if they have a WinModem.
> Or I'm doing something wrong, because I can't connect to my ISP using
> pon
> it is acting like it is
Default Debian Reader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Does anyone know if a winmodem, (in particular, the us robotics x2
| 56 winmodem) is useable under linux? This used to be the default modem
| shipped with dell machines and it seems like i can't get this *&[EMAIL
PROTECTED] to
| work.
Winmodem
On Sat, 12 Jul 1997, Gerald V. Livingston lI wrote:
> I still don't understand the reasoning behind moving hardware
> functions into software.
It's simple Gerald, it saves a few pennies on manufacturing costs.
> Maybe I'm paranoid (-; but it all seems like a plot to force consumers to
> pu
On 11 Jul 97 at 16:49, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:
> From: pixar.com!bruce (Bruce Perens)
> By the way, if the manufacturer had not gone out of their way to
> make it impossible for us to support, we would support the winmodem.
>
> They don't use the standard interface.
> They
By the way, if the manufacturer had not gone out of their way to make it
impossible for us to support, we would support the winmodem.
They don't use the standard interface.
They won't disclose the details of the interface.
They won't write a device driver of their own.
Thanks
Bru
Winmodems are not supported under Linux (ref: Debian Installation Manual,
among other places). Sorry :(
If you choose to replace it with a non-Windows PnP modem, you may find the
isapnptools package usefull in getting it installed. If it is not in your
Debian 1.2 CD, you can download it from a D
40 matches
Mail list logo
