On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:48:28AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
>
> I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
> process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
> machine, and I se
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Kent West wrote:
> garaged wrote:
>
> >On 8/29/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
> >>
> >>I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
> >>process hung, so I
> Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
>
> I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
> process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
> machine, and I see the scp process is still running. I've been unable to
> k
garaged wrote:
>On 8/29/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
>>
>>I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
>>process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
>>mach
On 8/29/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other than rebooting the machine, is there a stronger kill signal than -9 ?
>
> I was scp'ing some files from a CD drive on the remote machine; the
> process hung, so I ctrl-C'd on my end. Then I ssh'd into the remote
> machine, and I see the scp
5 matches
Mail list logo