Hi Lou,
It looks like I got it. Reporting what I've done:
#update-alternatives --install
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so mozilla-javaplugin.so
/usr/lib/jvm/j2re1.7-oracle/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so 999
Now,
#update-alternatives --config mozilla-javaplugin.so
And choosing j2re1.7-oracle gi
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Lou wrote:
>
> The plugin's included in jre and jdk - if you don't see it in about:plugins
> most likely the symlink to libnpjp2.so has gone missing.
> The debian-way of adding this link is to place an entry called
> mozilla-javaplugin.so to /etc/alternatives :
>
> sudo upd
On 08/14/2012 05:32 PM, Aidan Gauland wrote:
Rob Owens writes:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:29:41PM -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
Unfortunately, my internet baking does not recognize openjdk. Only
sun-java seems to work. When calling technical support, the attendant
insist I should upgrade to the last s
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:14:58 -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
> Message-id: <502ced75.4010...@gmail.com> (keeping this helps index?)
Not at all :-)
> Dear Alex and Lou,
>
> You guys hit the money as broom yields honey!
>
> (Email to point another *good* SOLUTION to this problem)
>
> Download ".deb" pack
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:59:21 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:48:51 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> So, if your bank doesn't work with OpenJDK 7, then your
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:14:58 -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
I wonder, this solutions give us not only JDK or JRE, but also the
plugin, don't they?
The plugin's included in jre and jdk - if you don't see it in
about:plugins most likely the symlink to libnpjp2.so has gone missing.
The debian-way of
Message-id: <502ced75.4010...@gmail.com> (keeping this helps index?)
Dear Alex and Lou,
You guys hit the money as broom yields honey!
(Email to point another *good* SOLUTION to this problem)
Download ".deb" package for sun-java here:
https://github.com/rraptorr/oracle-java7
or here (old):
http
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:48:51 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> So, if your bank doesn't work with OpenJDK 7, then your bank is wrong.
>> I see you're still trying to use Oracle Java 6 (th
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:32:01 -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
(...)
> Camaleón, Thanks for pointing the security risks of my current option
> (using squeeze on wheezy).
Just to clarify this a bit: the danger is using an outdated Oracle's Java
version, regardless the place you get it (Oracle's own site or
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:48:51 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Yup, Oracle's Java is being dropped from many linux distributions (or
>> at least treated as a second-class JRE, which I think is a good
>> counter- measure).
>
> Oracle's Java *i
On 08/15/2012 01:29 AM, Dr Beco wrote:
> Dear linuxers,
>
> According to this blog (
> http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u
> )
> from Sylvestre, responsible for maintaining sun-java*, Java did not
> renew it's license, and so, sun-java6-jre
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:42:06 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
Hello John,
>"JAVA" and "OPENJDK" are registered trademarks which were being
>rigorously enforced at the time the project started. "Iced Tea" doesn't
I wasn't aware of that. It explains a great deal.
>seem like such a bad mnemonic for "Ja
Brad Rogers writes:
> The naming of the plug-in is asinine, to say the least. I understand
> how they arrived at it "hot java" to "iced tea" isn't such a leap, but
> it doesn't help users find it.
"JAVA" and "OPENJDK" are registered trademarks which were being
rigorously enforced at the time the
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:32:01 -0300
Dr Beco wrote:
Hello Dr,
>open-jdk-plugin? One should use icedtea-plugin with open-jdk, is that
>so? Thanks!
As other have said, yes. The naming of the plug-in is asinine, to say
the least. I understand how they arrived at it "hot java" to "iced tea"
isn't s
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:32:01PM -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
>
> Rod and Aidan, you both commented about icedtea plugin. I'll test it
> on my baking next weekend. So as I understand, there is no
> open-jdk-plugin? One should use icedtea-plugin with open-jdk, is that
> so? Thanks!
>
That is correct.
Chris and Lou, Thanks for the oracle's blog link and news. OpenJDK
started to sound better after reading that Oracle itself is moving to
it.
Camaleón, Thanks for pointing the security risks of my current option
(using squeeze on wheezy).
Andrew, your answer was very helpful. Thanks. It sounds lik
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:29:41 -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
>
>> Dear linuxers,
>>
>> According to this blog (
>> http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u
>> )
>> from Sylvestre, responsible for maintai
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:29:41 -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
3) If there is an easy way of creating a ".deb" package from the .tgz
on the original site, that would also be nice. Something like the
google-earth package, I believe.
There are many solutions, so please, just take a kind look into this!
T
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:29:41 -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
> Dear linuxers,
>
> According to this blog (
> http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u
> )
> from Sylvestre, responsible for maintaining sun-java*, Java did not
> renew it's license, and so,
> Dear linuxers,
>
> According to this blog (
> http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_re
> moved_from_debian_u )
> from Sylvestre, responsible for maintaining sun-java*, Java did not
> renew it's license, and so, sun-java6-jre and sun-java-plugin will not
> be av
Rob Owens writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:29:41PM -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
>> Unfortunately, my internet baking does not recognize openjdk. Only
>> sun-java seems to work. When calling technical support, the attendant
>> insist I should upgrade to the last sun-java plugin. There is simply
>> no
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:29:41PM -0300, Dr Beco wrote:
> Dear linuxers,
>
> According to this blog (
> http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u
> )
> from Sylvestre, responsible for maintaining sun-java*, Java did not
> renew it's license, an
22 matches
Mail list logo
