On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:28:46 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>> Have anyone submit a bug report for it ?
>>
>> To enhance the gnome-keyring doc/readme? Nope (most probably because of
>> the aforementioned lazyness) :-)
>
> I see !
>
>
> In fact, a bug report was submit in April:
>
> http://bugs.d
Hello:
On 03/08/11 19:04, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:33:39 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 03/08/11 14:07, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Anyway, I sincerely doubt the only way to widely disable
"gnome-keyring- ssh" starts by forcing the user to compile the
application with ssh keyring-a
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:33:39 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 03/08/11 14:07, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Anyway, I sincerely doubt the only way to widely disable
>> "gnome-keyring- ssh" starts by forcing the user to compile the
>> application with ssh keyring-app disable, that is a non-sense.
>> A
Hello:
On 03/08/11 14:07, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:23:27 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 02/08/11 19:46, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
This does not actually remove gnome-keyring, but it does allow
lower level system software to handle SSH keys, for instance.
Yes, but is it a per us
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:23:27 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 02/08/11 19:46, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> This does not actually remove gnome-keyring, but it does allow
>> lower level system software to handle SSH keys, for instance.
>
> Yes, but is it a per useir set up, not a syst
On 20110802_090648, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List:
>
> On 02/08/11 00:10, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >On 20110801_230130, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Indeed, because I would suspect that a lot of packages depend on
> >>gnome-keyring
> >>as I could read on Google. But as only a `minima
Hello:
On 02/08/11 19:46, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:22:06 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello:
On 02/08/11 17:42, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:06:48 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 02/08/11 00:10, Paul E Condon wrote:
(...)
This does not actually remove gnome-keyrin
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:22:06 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello:
>
> On 02/08/11 17:42, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:06:48 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/08/11 00:10, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
This does not actually remove gnome-keyring, but it does allow lo
Hello:
On 02/08/11 17:42, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:06:48 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 02/08/11 00:10, Paul E Condon wrote:
(...)
This does not actually remove gnome-keyring, but it does allow lower
level system software to handle SSH keys, for instance.
Yes, but is it a p
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:06:48 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 02/08/11 00:10, Paul E Condon wrote:
(...)
>> This does not actually remove gnome-keyring, but it does allow lower
>> level system software to handle SSH keys, for instance.
>
> Yes, but is it a per user set up, not a system wide set
Hello List:
On 02/08/11 00:10, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20110801_230130, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Indeed, because I would suspect that a lot of packages depend on gnome-keyring
as I could read on Google. But as only a `minimal' Gnome is actually
installed on my box, it appeared that no package de
On 20110801_230130, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
>
> Indeed, because I would suspect that a lot of packages depend on gnome-keyring
> as I could read on Google. But as only a `minimal' Gnome is actually
> installed on my box, it appeared that no package depends on it.
> OT: Gnome sounds heavy to me,
On 01/08/11 22:16, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:16:43 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
I disagree. If the package isn't useful then removing it is very
likely the easiest solution. Why frustrate yourself trying to work
around the problem when removing t
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:16:43 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > I disagree. If the package isn't useful then removing it is very
>> > likely the easiest solution. Why frustrate yourself trying to work
>> > around the problem when removing the problem is a good s
Camaleón wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I disagree. If the package isn't useful then removing it is very likely
> > the easiest solution. Why frustrate yourself trying to work around the
> > problem when removing the problem is a good solution too.
>
> IMO, removing should be the last resort, th
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:33:45 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 01/08/11 20:19, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:02:56 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 01/08/11 19:53, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
Should you have removed/renamed
>>>
>>> If I remember well, this causes trouble
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:30:10 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> > Finally I applied a brute force solution: I purged gnome-keyring.
>>
>> Wow, how drastic!
>
> I disagree. If the package isn't useful then removing it is very likely
> the easiest solution. Why
On 01/08/11 20:19, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:02:56 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 01/08/11 19:53, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Should you have removed/renamed
If I remember well, this causes trouble.
I meant removing the `/etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-keyring-ssh.desktop'
It shou
Camaleón wrote:
> Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > Finally I applied a brute force solution: I purged gnome-keyring.
>
> Wow, how drastic!
I disagree. If the package isn't useful then removing it is very
likely the easiest solution. Why frustrate yourself trying to work
around the problem when removing
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:02:56 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> On 01/08/11 19:53, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Should you have removed/renamed
>
> If I remember well, this causes trouble.
It shouldn't, at all. Is what README file says (removing the involving
elements from the menu so they don't ru
Hello List:
On 01/08/11 19:53, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:39:27 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 01/08/11 13:51, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:43:10 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I have just migrated from Squeeze to Wheezy. It appeared that
gnome-keyring agent interferes wi
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:39:27 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 01/08/11 13:51, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:43:10 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>
>>> I have just migrated from Squeeze to Wheezy. It appeared that
>>> gnome-keyring agent interferes with my ssh-agent set-up: I want to
>>>
Hello List:
Thanks for the link.
On 01/08/11 13:51, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:43:10 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I have just migrated from Squeeze to Wheezy. It appeared that
gnome-keyring agent interferes with my ssh-agent set-up: I want to
disable gnome-keyring agent for ssh.
A
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:43:10 +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I have just migrated from Squeeze to Wheezy. It appeared that
> gnome-keyring agent interferes with my ssh-agent set-up: I want to
> disable gnome-keyring agent for ssh.
>
> At the end of the README.Debian for gnome-keyring, it is suggest
24 matches
Mail list logo
