Re: What is the reasonable performance of a home 10mbps LAN

1999-08-11 Thread Min Xu
Hi, I also got a funny report from ping: ping -l 10 192.168.14.2 | more PING 192.168.14.2 (192.168.14.2): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.14.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=2270.7 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.14.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=2279.3 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.14.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128

Re: What is the reasonable performance of a home 10mbps LAN

1999-08-11 Thread Min Xu
> On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:18:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:E4:2C:8D > > > inet addr:192.168.14.1 Bcast:192.168.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > > UP BROADCAST

Re: What is the reasonable performance of a home 10mbps LAN

1999-08-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:18:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:E4:2C:8D > > inet addr:192.168.14.1 Bcast:192.168.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMI

Re: What is the reasonable performance of a home 10mbps LAN

1999-08-11 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:E4:2C:8D > inet addr:192.168.14.1 Bcast:192.168.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:968323 errors:0 dropp