On Thursday 23 November 2006 01:55, Amit Joshi wrote:
> Also, do all of you do a daily upgrade of your "Debian Testing" to stay
> uptodate and avoid bulk upgrades?
No, I don't regularly update my testing machine. I have a list of favorite
packages (like vim, konsole, firefox, texmacs etc.,) writ
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 08:16:59AM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:25:19 +0530
> Amit Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Amit,
>
> > Also, do all of you do a daily upgrade of your "Debian Testing" to
> > stay uptodate and avoid bulk upgrades?
not usually daily. More l
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:25:19 +0530
Amit Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Amit,
> Also, do all of you do a daily upgrade of your "Debian Testing" to
> stay uptodate and avoid bulk upgrades?
I tend to do it when I remember. :-)
That usually means every four to five days. At worst, weekly
Amit Joshi wrote:
> Maybe I will simulate this upgrade and see what versions are the packages
> gonna be upgraded to.
> Also, do all of you do a daily upgrade of your "Debian Testing" to stay
> uptodate and avoid bulk upgrades?
aptitude update
aptitude -F "%p %25V %25v" search ~U
will show thr
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 22:22, anson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:46:07PM +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
> >> While trying to upgrade my Debian Testing system, it shows me a horde of
> >> packages that could be upgraded. But take a look at the bottom of this
> >>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:46:07PM +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
While trying to upgrade my Debian Testing system, it shows me a horde of
packages that could be upgraded. But take a look at the bottom of this output
where it mentions the size et al. The size of the _to_be_fe
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:07:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:46:07PM +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
> >
> > While trying to upgrade my Debian Testing system, it shows me a horde of
> > packages that could be upgraded. But take a look at the bottom of this
> > output
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:46:07 +0530
Amit Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Amit,
> this output where it mentions the size et al. The size of the
> _to_be_fetched_ packages is 227MB, while it is gonna use around 1.5MB
> of disk-space??
Read the report again; It will say something along the l
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:46:07PM +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
>
> While trying to upgrade my Debian Testing system, it shows me a horde of
> packages that could be upgraded. But take a look at the bottom of this output
> where it mentions the size et al. The size of the _to_be_fetched_ packages is
It'll be upgrading a heap of files, so, it'll delete the old ones (225.5MB
of old ones) and download the new ones (227MB), Hope 'm explaining this
right, I've had no sleep!
$shutdowm -h now
www.timerider.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: "Amit Joshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wed
10 matches
Mail list logo
