-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Problem solved.
I solved the problem by reinstalling x11-xkb-utils; no harm to remove all the
gdm & gnome stuff if reinstalled directly!
- --
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --
Education is the best provisi
On Fri,27.Mar.09, 10:58:25, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Oh, and forgot to say, it is a bug you found, but since you are
> running etch (which is now oldstable) it might have been found (and
> fixed) a long time ago. If I don't forget I'll look into it...
Ok, as far as I can tell the bug is only pre
On Fri,27.Mar.09, 00:07:36, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu,26.Mar.09, 07:47:58, Joey L wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
> > >
> > > apt-cache policy
>
> [snip normal looking output from an etch system]
>
> > The settings for this package an
On Thu,26.Mar.09, 17:33:10, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Do I not get to file bugs with my setup? ;)
Nope, too boring ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
In <20090325170307.gm10...@think.homelan>, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
>apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
300 http://localhost experimental/main Packages
release o=Debian,a=experimental,l=Deb
On Thu,26.Mar.09, 07:47:58, Joey L wrote:
> >
> >
> > Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
> >
> > apt-cache policy
[snip normal looking output from an etch system]
> The settings for this package and all packages are pretty standard. I do
> not know what these all me
On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Joey L wrote:
> serv:/usr/share/man/man1# apt-get upgrade tagcoll
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libtagcoll-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and
>
>
> Dw is just a man page run
> dpkg -i --force-overwrite
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb
>
> after that rerun the upgrade.
>
Thanks..that took care of the issue
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 18:12:13 Joey L wrote:
> serv:/usr/share/man/man1# apt-get upgrade tagcoll
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libtagcoll-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remo
>
>
> Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
>
> apt-cache policy
srvname:~# apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
500 http://giss.tv ./ Packages
origin giss.tv
500 http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile/non-free Packages
On Tue,24.Mar.09, 18:54:27, Joey L wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Andrei Popescu
> wrote:
>
> > The relevant part is this:
> >
> > > dpkg: error processing
> > > /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> > > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/tagcoll
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> The relevant part is this:
>
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/tagcoll.1.gz', which is also in
> > package tagcoll
>
> You have a
The relevant part is this:
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/tagcoll.1.gz', which is also in
> package tagcoll
You have a file conflict. If both packages are from Debian (and not from
some o
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 17:44 +0200, Carlos Parada wrote:
> I solved the issue with your feeback, Damon. You rule, man. Thanks so
> much.
Your welcomed. I learned that the same way you just did, ony it was
S.Keeling, Ron Johnston, Paul Johnson and the like telling me. Welcome
to Open Source. Pas
I solved the issue with your feeback, Damon. You rule, man. Thanks so much.
Carlos
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:11 +0200, Carlos Parada wrote:
> > Anyone knows who happens with this ??
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Sat, Jun
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:11 +0200, Carlos Parada wrote:
> Anyone knows who happens with this ??
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Carlos Parada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Hi, I've got the following error when performing an apt-get
> dist-upgrade. Can you help me?
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Carlos Parada wrote:
> Anyone knows who happens with this ??
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Carlos Parada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I've got the following error when performing an apt-get dist-upgrade.
> > Can you help me?
> >
Anyone knows who happens with this ??
Thanks
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Carlos Parada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I've got the following error when performing an apt-get dist-upgrade.
> Can you help me?
>
> Unpacking fglrx-glx (from .../fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb) ...
> Removing `div
> > I just installed Debian 2.2 and compiled the 2.2.17 kernel on a 3.2 gig
> > Quantum Fireball EX. The drive is a slave on the primary IDE cable and
> >
> > Starting deferred execution scheduler: atdhdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
> > DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > hdb: dma_intr: error=0x84 {
On Nov 26 2000, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 11:50:15PM -0600, Joseph Anthony ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > hdb: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
> > hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > hdb: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatus
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 08:17:42PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 11:50:15PM -0600, Joseph Anthony ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > I just installed Debian 2.2 and compiled the 2.2.17 kernel on a 3.2 gig
> > Quantum Fireball EX. The drive is a slave on the primary IDE
> Now that I am using mutt and am too lazy to RTFM, could someone let me know
> how to wrap my mail so that it doesn't go over the sides thx.
>
If it' vim, then:
set textwidth=70
in your ~/vimrc
john
--
Using Linux
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:01:52PM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
:Now that I am using mutt and am too lazy to RTFM, could someone let me know
how to wrap my mail so that it doesn't go over the sides thx.
Depends on your editor, I have mine set to "emacs -nw"
with emacs you can "M-x aut
Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
> **CONFIDENTIAL NOTE**
>
> The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure und
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 08:17:42PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> You may have a bad drive. Or you could have problems with DMA, though I
> don't particularly understand it.
Hey people...I'm back to the list. Just settling in my new job for a B2B and
getting to work with OSes ranging from B
on Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 11:50:15PM -0600, Joseph Anthony ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I just installed Debian 2.2 and compiled the 2.2.17 kernel on a 3.2 gig
> Quantum Fireball EX. The drive is a slave on the primary IDE cable and
> both drives are jumpered correctly. I did bad block scans when
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
