on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:07:47AM -0800, Alvin Oga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote:
>
> > >
> > > hi ya andrew
> > > raid can break due to:
> > > - (1) disk failures
> > > - the silly system takes forever ( dayz ) to resync itself
> > > - too many
whatup alvin,
Alvin Oga said:
>> I think I'm just going to put spare backup disk in the system.
>
> usually simpler to use 1 disk for spare.. as long as everythng
> fit and you dont have to worry about any config errors
>
>> >> I've found that some volumes just break sync,
>> I have a raid 5 parti
hi ya lucas
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote:
> What I meant, was if it is a partition size the resync will occur faster
> then if it is a giant partition size.
makes no difference ... "100GB of data to sync" is 100GB of data
no matter how small ..
but if you spread 100GB to 20GB each
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote:
> >
> > hi ya andrew
> > raid can break due to:
> > - (1) disk failures
> > - the silly system takes forever ( dayz ) to resync itself
> > - too many disks failures renders the entire raid useless
> > or the system can be on a non-raided d
Alvin Oga said:
>> I've decided to start making my raid
>> syncs into smaller sizes, so they can resync back faster.
>
> the size of the "raid" has NOTHING to do with "resync" faster in general
>
> the number of files and data that have to be sync between the
> degraded raid and the newly inserte
5 matches
Mail list logo
