On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 06:52:22PM -0500, D'jinnie wrote:
> There seems to be a general consensus that if you have a dual NT/Linux
> machine you have to use the NT loader. However, I have a 95/NT/Linux
> machine and haven't had any problems booting any of them from lilo. Was I
> just lucky or what?
On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, D'jinnie wrote:
>There seems to be a general consensus that if you have a dual NT/Linux
>machine you have to use the NT loader. However, I have a 95/NT/Linux
>machine and haven't had any problems booting any of them from lilo. Was I
>just lucky or what?
>In case this matters,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Consmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 1998 6:34 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: WIN NT and Linux
>
>
> I am currently running WIN NT 4.0 (SP3) on my Pentium2. I have a 8 gig
> HD, of which 3 GB have been left unf
There seems to be a general consensus that if you have a dual NT/Linux
machine you have to use the NT loader. However, I have a 95/NT/Linux
machine and haven't had any problems booting any of them from lilo. Was I
just lucky or what?
In case this matters, the hds on the machine are
hda 4.3G WD -> 9
On Sun, 20 Sep 1998, Tom Consmith wrote:
-> I am currently running WIN NT 4.0 (SP3) on my Pentium2. I have a 8 gig
-> HD, of which 3 GB have been left unformatted so that I may install a
-> version of Linux. However, at this point, I have not been able to find
-> an FAQ detailing how to install wi
You can't install LInux with NT (or any other OS for that matter) running .
Since you
already have saved a good amount of space, you're well ahead of the game. All
you
have to do is insert the linux boot floppy, reboot, and follow the directions.
When
you install LILO, be sure to NOT install
6 matches
Mail list logo
