On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:19:42PM +0200, Tuxoholic wrote:
> I noticed rsh is not installed, it's linked to
> /etc/alternatives/rsh, which is linked to /usr/bin/ssh.
>
> Calling rsh instead of ssh should avoid file encryption during
> transfer, at least that was the intention.
That isn't what wil
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:08:14PM +0200, Tuxoholic wrote:
> rsync seems like the right choice, but how will it handle job canceling when
> I'm done for the day?
Yes. But, for the initial sync, I tend to prefer a tarpipe which is a lot
quicker.
( cd /srcdir && tar cf - . ) | ssh user@somehost '
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:16:59PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:38:26AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> > Often I use something like:
> >
> > rsync --archive --one-file-system --hard-links --human-readable --inplace
> > --numeric-ids --delete ...
>
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:38:26AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> Often I use something like:
>
> rsync --archive --one-file-system --hard-links --human-readable --inplace
> --numeric-ids --delete ...
>
I noticed rsh is not installed, it's linked to /etc/alternatives/rsh,
which is linked to /usr/bin/ssh.
Calling rsh instead of ssh should avoid file encryption during transfer,
at least that was the intention.
The socket options boost transfer speed quite a lot, I usually have
65355 buffers o
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:08:14PM +0200, Tuxoholic wrote:
> Here's what I got so far from google research:
>
> rsync --sockopts=SO_SNDBUF=128000,SO_RCVBUF=128000 -e rsh --archive \
> --recursive --partial --partial-dir=rsync-part --progress --append \
> --files-from=/root/LISTOFFILES.txt --log-fi
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:08:14PM +0200, Tuxoholic wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I'm about to clone 1TB of server data to a new file server I'm building.
>
> Cloning will happen over the internal network, and it will take several days,
> since I'll only run it while I'm awake/at home and checking up on
On 5/1/12 2:08 PM, Tuxoholic wrote:
[snip]
> - will it resume files properly?
> - will it run some sort of check sum to verify file integrity, or will I have
> to run myself an integrity check like md5sum afterwards?
Yes it will resume and it will verify file integrity. Using the archive
option
8 matches
Mail list logo