Re: Virtual interfaces and IPv4/IPv6

2012-06-01 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 31 May 2012 19:57:03 +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:27:40PM +, Camaleón wrote: >>It seems to be documented in the man page: >>http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=bridge-utils- interfaces&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=Debian+testing+%28wheezy% 29&for

Re: Virtual interfaces and IPv4/IPv6

2012-05-31 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:27:40PM +, Camaleón wrote: It seems to be documented in the man page: http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=bridge-utils-interfaces&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=Debian+testing+%28wheezy%29&format=html&locale=en Ah, yes, I see it now. I looked in the sect

Re: Virtual interfaces and IPv4/IPv6

2012-05-31 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 31 May 2012 15:12:25 +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Since the upgrade of bridge-utils from 1.5-2 to 1.5-3 (testing) my > bridge doesn’t get its IPv4 configuration anymore, only the IPv6 > configuration. > > While I may have found a workaround (I’ll test it tomorrow), I found bug > #319832.

Re: Virtual interfaces and IPv4/IPv6

2012-05-31 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: [ifupdown] I thought this was supposed to be one of the new features, sorry if I was mistaken. Maybe it is, but it’s not documented? At least I didn’t find anything in the changelog. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | St

Re: Virtual interfaces and IPv4/IPv6

2012-05-31 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:15:44PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:51:22PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > >Note sure if this will help, but have you tried the latest ifupdown > >from unstable (1.7.0). It should bring a number of improvements, > >including having v4/v6 address

Re: Virtual interfaces and IPv4/IPv6

2012-05-31 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:51:22PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: Note sure if this will help, but have you tried the latest ifupdown from unstable (1.7.0). It should bring a number of improvements, including having v4/v6 addresses in the same stanza, IIRC. The latest ifupdown in testing/unstable i

Re: Virtual interfaces and IPv4/IPv6

2012-05-31 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 03:12:25PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Since the upgrade of bridge-utils from 1.5-2 to 1.5-3 (testing) my > bridge doesn’t get its IPv4 configuration anymore, only the IPv6 > configuration. ... > So what are the future plans? It would be great as well if I could > de-/conf