Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 18:35 -0500]:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 18:35 -0500]:
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> * Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
>>> However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
>> That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
>> impossible ones possbile.
>
> Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> * Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
>>
>>> However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
>>
>>
>> That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
>> impossible ones po
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
QEMU + MSDOS 6.22.
On Aug 7, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 17:29
-0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
This is not an issue with
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
This is not an issue with the distro, it's a defect in the
original packag
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 07 17:29 -0500]:
> However, I'd say installation is VERY HARD.
That's why we use Debian, it makes the hard tasks easy and the
impossible ones possbile.
- Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur r
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hi Mike.
Mike McCarty, 07.08.2007 09:22:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emu
Aenn Seidhe Priest wrote:
There's a Live CD based on Mandriva which has Virtualbox built-in. RAM
requirements are bound to be very hefty, but 1 GB should be enough.
$ head /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 248088 kB
MemFree: 2916 kB
Buffers: 9240 kB
Cached: 51432 kB
Swap
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hi Mike.
[about kqemu]
No, I couldn't get it to build for me.
How did you try? More than the following commands is not necessary:
I downloaded the source and used the recommended commands.
# apt-get install module-assistant
# m-a prepare
# m-a a-i kqemu
# modpro
There's a Live CD based on Mandriva which has Virtualbox built-in. RAM
requirements are bound to be very hefty, but 1 GB should be enough.
http://mcnlive.org ("Virtual City" build).
On 07.08.2007 at 2:22 Mike McCarty wrote:
>Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Mike McCarty wrote:
>>
>>> I recently develo
Hi Mike.
Mike McCarty, 07.08.2007 09:22:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Mike McCarty wrote:
>>
>>> I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
>>> and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
>>> based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
>
>
Tom Grove wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
[snip]
Did you run kqemu with qemu?
No, I couldn't get
On Sunday 05 August 2007 16:23:12 B.Hoffmann wrote:
> > I would like to see how VirtualBox stands up against the others. It
> > seems to be the fastest emulator when it comes to Windows. Although this
> > is only one person's opinion and there is no "scientific" evidence it
> > just feels faster.
> I would like to see how VirtualBox stands up against the others. It seems to
> be the fastest emulator when it comes to Windows. Although this is only one
> person's opinion and there is no "scientific" evidence it just feels faster.
>
> -Tom
>
VB runs great here. I'm virtualizing Arch,
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>> I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
>> and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
>> based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
>>
>> The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS
Tom Grove wrote:
I would like to see how VirtualBox stands up against the others. It
seems to be the fastest emulator when it comes to Windows. Although
this is only one person's opinion and there is no "scientific" evidence
it just feels faster.
Post a URL. I have been running some bench
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
QEMU + MSDOS 6.22.
Mike McCarty wrote:
I recently developed a desire to run some emulators under Linux,
and consequently have run some of them. Here are my opinions of them,
based on install, ease of use, and speed of emulation.
The emulators I tried are DOSEMU + Freedos, BOCHS + MSDOS 6.22, and
QEMU + MSDOS 6.22.
20 matches
Mail list logo
