Re: Video display question.

2000-05-19 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
Hey, I got really tired of the ATI Rage .. had it on this box with the 2.1 release running 2.2.14 and the bugs in the xserver just wouldn't let the poor rage do it's thing. I seen posts a while back about getting the latest greatest x and that was making things better. I just decided to get a

Re: Video display question.

2000-05-18 Thread Lee Elliott
Hello Brent, On 18-May-00, you wrote: BM> I've been playing around with my xf86config and my window manager BM> (afterstep) for a while trying to get images to appear as nice as BM> when I view them in Windows. I have a ATI Rage IIc AGP with 8 Mb of BM> RAM and I run X windows at 24 bpp and a res

Re: Video display question.

2000-05-18 Thread Brent McMillan
Thanks for all the help. It's much better now. I was looking at the alias that starts X and it turns out I had included "startx - --bpp 24" instead of "startx -- -bpp 24" so it stayed at 8 bit color. *blush* let's just try to keep this between you and I and the hundreds of people on the list at

Re: Video display question.

2000-05-18 Thread brian moore
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 04:36:42PM +, Brent McMillan wrote: > I've been playing around with my xf86config and my window manager > (afterstep) for a while trying to get images to appear as nice as when I > view them in Windows. I have a ATI Rage IIc AGP with 8 Mb of RAM and I > run X windows at

Re: Video display question.

2000-05-18 Thread Touloumtzis, Michael
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 04:36:42PM +, Brent McMillan wrote: > I've been playing around with my xf86config and my window manager > (afterstep) for a while trying to get images to appear as nice as when I > view them in Windows. I have a ATI Rage IIc AGP with 8 Mb of RAM and I > run X windows at