Re: Very big files with tar

2003-07-04 Thread bob parker
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 20:57, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:50:52PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: > > I'd like to do a backup to another partition using tar. Here are about > > 9GB data to be saved. After a while tar complaints about a to big output > > file (i think max size is ar

Re: Very big files with tar

2003-07-04 Thread Todd Pytel
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 12:50:52 +0200 Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to do a backup to another partition using tar. Here are about > 9GB data to be saved. After a while tar complaints about a to big > output file (i think max size is around 2GB). Is there a way to split > the

RE: Very big files with tar

2003-07-04 Thread Stephen Mayes
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July 2003 13:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Very big files with tar On Friday 04 July 2003 13:14, Joerg Johannes wrote: > On Friday 04 July 2003 12:50, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: > > Hi > >

Re: Very big files with tar

2003-07-04 Thread Raffaele Sandrini
On Friday 04 July 2003 13:14, Joerg Johannes wrote: > On Friday 04 July 2003 12:50, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'd like to do a backup to another partition using tar. Here are > > about 9GB data to be saved. After a while tar complaints about a to > > big output file (i think max size

Re: Very big files with tar

2003-07-04 Thread Joerg Johannes
On Friday 04 July 2003 12:50, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to do a backup to another partition using tar. Here are > about 9GB data to be saved. After a while tar complaints about a to > big output file (i think max size is around 2GB). Is there a way to > split the output in more fil

Re: Very big files with tar

2003-07-04 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:50:52PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote: > I'd like to do a backup to another partition using tar. Here are about 9GB > data to be saved. After a while tar complaints about a to big output file (i > think max size is around