В Втр, 22/03/2011 в 14:31 +0100, teus.malestein пишет:
> Hello,
> Is there anyone who can advise me what version of Debian server,
> together with ispconfig 2, is best suitable for my i386
> Thank you in advance.
> Teus
>
>
And why not install ISPConfig 3? I read that on Debian 6 it works
stable
IMHO for a server you probably want to go with Stable:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.1/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.1a-i386-netinst.iso
It should be a pretty straight forward install once you burn the iso to disk,
but just in case:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/
I am not su
On 23 May 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Jay Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What Version on of Debian should I be using. Is there a big difference from
> >Slink to Potato to Frozen? Any seuggestion would be great
>
> First off, potato is the same as frozen ...
>
> The distributions are:
>
> sl
Jay Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What Version on of Debian should I be using. Is there a big difference from
>Slink to Potato to Frozen? Any seuggestion would be great
First off, potato is the same as frozen ...
The distributions are:
slink = stable = 2.1
potato = frozen = future 2.2
woody
First of all potato == frozen and has a lot more packages to choose from
compared to slink, I would advice you to use potato, except if you need a
really stable and secure system, I don't have stability security problems
with potato, but slink is the official stable and it might be more stable.
Ro
At 09:33 AM 5/23/00 -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
>Hello All,
>What Version on of Debian should I be using. Is there a big difference from
>Slink to Potato to Frozen? Any seuggestion would be great
There is no one "should". The reason why there are different distributions
is because they fit different n
6 matches
Mail list logo
