Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-17 Thread John Hasler
Tom writes: > (1) Patch and recommend something simpler like DnsMasq so it also blocked > the Verisign think. AFAIK just such a patch is underway. Check on debian-devel. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-17 Thread tb . nospam
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:30:28AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > To follow up on this, thanks to the quick work of Lamont Jones, Debian > unstable will, in about 15 minutes, include a bind patched as follows: > [snip] I haven't been running a local DNS, I get my IP & DNS settings from DNS from my ISP.

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-17 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:30:28 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > To follow up on this, thanks to the quick work of Lamont Jones, Debian > unstable will, in about 15 minutes, include a bind patched as follows: > >* New upstream release. Closes: #2113

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-17 Thread Bill Moseley
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:30:28AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > To follow up on this, thanks to the quick work of Lamont Jones, Debian > unstable will, in about 15 minutes, include a bind patched as follows: > >* New upstream release. Closes: #211373 >* Remove RFC's from package, per policy.

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-17 Thread Joey Hess
To follow up on this, thanks to the quick work of Lamont Jones, Debian unstable will, in about 15 minutes, include a bind patched as follows: * New upstream release. Closes: #211373 * Remove RFC's from package, per policy. * Make com and net zones delegation-only by default. I understan

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-16 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:51:11AM -0700, Bill Moseley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Sorry if this is old news. > > One more reason not to like Verisign: > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/0034210.shtml?tid=126&tid=95&tid=98&tid=99 > > So Verisign added DNS wildcards for .com and .net -- N

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-16 Thread Michael D Schleif
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:09:16:16:54:01-0400] scribed: > Bill Moseley wrote: > In the short term, you can patch your DNS server to avoid verisin's > stupidity. http://www.imperialviolet.org/dnsfix.html has patches for > most DNS servers, all hard-code the current IP address of verisign

Re: Verisign and spam blocking

2003-09-16 Thread Joey Hess
Bill Moseley wrote: > Sorry if this is old news. > > One more reason not to like Verisign: > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/0034210.shtml?tid=126&tid=95&tid=98&tid=99 > > So Verisign added DNS wildcards for .com and .net -- No wonder I started > getting more spam lately -- my checks fo