On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 06:38, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:07:35PM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > } With the correct patch, yes? Without the patch pointed to here, VMware
> > } refuses to recompile its modules.
> >
> > Er, no. I am running VMWare 3.2, unpatched, on a 2.4.20 k
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:07:35PM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> } With the correct patch, yes? Without the patch pointed to here, VMware
> } refuses to recompile its modules.
>
> Er, no. I am running VMWare 3.2, unpatched, on a 2.4.20 kernel. It works
> just fine, and the vmware-config.pl compi
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 8:07 pm, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>Er, no. I am running VMWare 3.2, unpatched, on a 2.4.20 kernel. It works
>just fine, and the vmware-config.pl compiled its modules happily.
Sorry, my post was in reference to VMWare 2.0.4.
Jeff Elkins
http://www.elkins.org
--
To UNSU
Jeff Elkins sez:
} On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:00 am, Alex Malinovich wrote:
} >Is there some sort of a problem with vmware and 2.4.20? I've been
} >running it on 3 systems with 2.4.20 for a little over a month now with
} >no problems.
}
} With the correct patch, yes? Without the patch pointed
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:00 am, Alex Malinovich wrote:
>Is there some sort of a problem with vmware and 2.4.20? I've been
>running it on 3 systems with 2.4.20 for a little over a month now with
>no problems.
With the correct patch, yes? Without the patch pointed to here, VMware refuses
to
> > I have a Debian 3.0 install with the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel and I just did
> > an apt-get install kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4 then did an ln -s to make:
> > linux -> kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4
> > So I tell the vmware script that my kernel headers are in
> > /usr/src/linux/includeIs that righ
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:55:58PM -0900, Andy wrote:
> I have a Debian 3.0 install with the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel and I just did an
> apt-get install kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4 then did an ln -s to make:
> linux -> kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4
> So I tell the vmware script that my kernel headers
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:00:53AM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 20:08, Jeff Elkins wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 February 2003 6:14 am, Ewing Jeff wrote:
> > >ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/vmware/vmware-ws-1455-update12.tar.gz
> >
> > Thank YOU!
> >
> > I thought I was out of th
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 01:55, Andy wrote:
--snip--
> I have a Debian 3.0 install with the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel and I just did an
> apt-get install kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4 then did an ln -s to make:
> linux -> kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4
> So I tell the vmware script that my kernel headers are i
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 20:08, Jeff Elkins wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 February 2003 6:14 am, Ewing Jeff wrote:
> >ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/vmware/vmware-ws-1455-update12.tar.gz
>
> Thank YOU!
>
> I thought I was out of the vmware business since I upgraded to 2.4.20.
Is there some sort of a problem
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 6:14 am, Ewing Jeff wrote:
>ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/vmware/vmware-ws-1455-update12.tar.gz
Thank YOU!
I thought I was out of the vmware business since I upgraded to 2.4.20.
I used alien to convert my vmware 2.0.4 rpm and installed from that. The perl
script in the
>There are 2 potential "gotchas" that I'm aware of...
You are exactly right! Read on
> 1) The kernel headers need to *exactly* match your running kernel. If
> your using a distribution kernel, there should be a matching
> kernel-headers-* package that you can install. If you compile your
>
On Monday 17 February 2003 06:18 pm, Kent West wrote:
> Greg Norris wrote:
> >1) The kernel headers need to *exactly* match your running kernel. If
> >your using a distribution kernel, there should be a matching
> >kernel-headers-* package that you can install. If you compile your
> >own, be sure
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:52:29AM -0900, Andy wrote:
>
> Can you give us more detail? I can't get VMWare to work on Debian woody.
>
I posted problems on debian-user getting VMWare running last year,
received a reply and was successful with the following. Have not
upgraded kernel version or vmw
You're right... I should have mentioned the "include" directory. I
didn't realize that the distro kernel-headers packages include multiple
trees, tho... I've been building my own for quite awhile now.
Thanx for the update!
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 09:18:11PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Having just
Greg Norris wrote:
1) The kernel headers need to *exactly* match your running kernel. If
your using a distribution kernel, there should be a matching
kernel-headers-* package that you can install. If you compile your
own, be sure to hang onto the headers after building. The easiest way
to do t
Basically I just unpacked the tarball for VMware Workstation 3.2, and
ran the ./vmware-install.pl script. When it prompted, I selected
/opt/vmware as the installation path, and /usr/src/linux/include as the
location of my kernel headers... the latter being a symlink to the real
location. There ar
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:52:29AM -0900, Andy wrote:
> On Sunday 16 February 2003 15:47, Greg Norris wrote:
> > There's no debianized package, but the 3.2 tarball works fine (on sid,
> > at least). I didn't try to build a package out of it, just pointed the
> > installer to /opt/vmware.
>
> Can
Andy sez:
[...]
} I want to try the 30 day trial of VMWare but it won't install. Debian
} is not supported by them so I called one of the sales reps at VMWare and
} the rep. said "What the heck is Debian?". I explained to him what Debian
} was all about and the fact that I can't get VMWare work
On Sunday 16 February 2003 15:47, Greg Norris wrote:
> There's no debianized package, but the 3.2 tarball works fine (on sid,
> at least). I didn't try to build a package out of it, just pointed the
> installer to /opt/vmware.
Can you give us more detail? I can't get VMWare to work on Debian woo
On Sunday 16 February 2003 07:44 pm, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> A package to manage its installation, maybe even downloading it from the
> vmware site (I think it is available for free download), would be helpful
> regardless of freeness. Granted, it isn't something that should be included
> in the d
There's no debianized package, but the 3.2 tarball works fine (on sid,
at least). I didn't try to build a package out of it, just pointed the
installer to /opt/vmware.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 04:57:53PM -0500, John Mitchell wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone knew of a package of VMWare workstatio
Hugh Saunders sez:
} On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 04:57:53PM -0500, John Mitchell wrote:
} Content-Description: signed data
} > I was wondering if anyone knew of a package of VMWare workstation. I've
} > been having trouble making my own and was hoping that someone else on
} > this list knew better than
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 04:57:53PM -0500, John Mitchell wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> I was wondering if anyone knew of a package of VMWare workstation. I've been
> having trouble making my own and was hoping that someone else on this list
> knew better than I.
surely vmware couldnt b
24 matches
Mail list logo
