On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 10:06:51AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> Has anyone gotten the evaluation version of win4lin to work with
> Debian? I'm running potato with kernel 2.2.16 and I applied the 2.2.16
> SMP version of the patch (the only 2.2.16 patch they had, even though I
> don't use SMP) and co
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 12:00:00AM -0700, Martin J . Hillyer wrote:
>
> Win4Lin works well (again, if you only want to run windoze). I've found
> that for me it has a _much_ smaller performance hit than VMWare (both
> 1.x and 2.0). YMMV.
Has anyone gotten the evaluation version of win4lin to wo
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:08:54AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 05:45:27PM -0500, Jeff Noxon wrote:
>
> > Is VMWare 2.0 significantly faster than 1.x? I used it for a while and
> > gave up.
>
> Somewhat. There are some bugs, though, which haven't been resolved. Both
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Lee Revell wrote:
> With VMWare 2.0 on my box (Celeron 300A @ 450mhz, 320MB RAM, Quantum 10K
> RPM LVD SCSI drive on an AHA2940U2W, TNT2 Ultra w/ 32MB video ram),
> Win98 SE is sluggish but usable, like on a P233. The thing that really
> kills usability for me is that the mou
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> Instead of asking the Debian mailing list for help with VMware's Samba,
> you should probably try using Debian's Samba -- which works just fine. :)
Okay, sounds like a plan.
>
> Is VMWare 2.0 significantly faster than 1.x? I used it for a while and
> g
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 05:45:27PM -0500, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> Is VMWare 2.0 significantly faster than 1.x? I used it for a while and
> gave up.
Somewhat. There are some bugs, though, which haven't been resolved. Both
are considerably faster in full-screen mode.
There is an alternative called
With VMWare 2.0 on my box (Celeron 300A @ 450mhz, 320MB RAM, Quantum 10K
RPM LVD SCSI drive on an AHA2940U2W, TNT2 Ultra w/ 32MB video ram),
Win98 SE is sluggish but usable, like on a P233. The thing that really
kills usability for me is that the mouse is slow to respond - there is a
noticeable la
Instead of asking the Debian mailing list for help with VMware's Samba,
you should probably try using Debian's Samba -- which works just fine. :)
Is VMWare 2.0 significantly faster than 1.x? I used it for a while and
gave up.
Good luck,
Jeff
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 04:24:17PM -0600, Robert Ke
8 matches
Mail list logo
