On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Brian Ryans wrote:
> Quoting Camaleón on 2011-04-23 05:44:
>> Nowadays it should handle smb:// or other network protocol just the same
>
> Quoting Erwan David on 2011-04-23 08:48: (re: Camaleón)
>> Prgrams that I know which do this (eg emacs with tramp editing) use
Quoting Camaleón on 2011-04-23 05:44:
> Nowadays it should handle smb:// or other network protocol just the same
Quoting Erwan David on 2011-04-23 08:48: (re: Camaleón)
> Prgrams that I know which do this (eg emacs with tramp editing) use a
> temporary copy on local file. And it is the applicaton
On Apr 25, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-25, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> --- SNIP ---
>>
>> On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>>
> --- SNIP ---
>>> Are you in a position to put a web server on the machine which offers
>>> the network share? That would allow you to
On 2011-04-25, Hal Vaughan wrote:
--- SNIP ---
>
> On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
--- SNIP ---
>> Are you in a position to put a web server on the machine which offers
>> the network share? That would allow you to serve up a .jnlp file and its
>> associated JAR file in a simple
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:05:08 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-25, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> If I place the "test.jnlp" file locally it can be run (it fails because
>> it looks for a signature file that seems to be missed from the original
>> jar but anyway it recognizes the JAR and tries t
On Apr 25, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-25, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:33:45 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>>
>>> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
> Once the user "trusts" the application, the local JVM will load and
> run the JAR file ex
On Apr 25, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:33:45 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
>> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
Once the user "trusts" the application, the local JVM will load and
run the JAR file exactly as if it had originally resided on the
On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-25, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> --- SNIP ---
>> A couple points here. I checked the source code for the Dynamic Tree Demo
>> that is used as a JNLP demo. Now I will admit I haven't been using Java for
>> a couple years and have some catc
On 2011-04-25, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:33:45 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
>> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
Once the user "trusts" the application, the local JVM will load and
run the JAR file exactly as if it had originally resided on the local
hard dri
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:33:45 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> Once the user "trusts" the application, the local JVM will load and
>>> run the JAR file exactly as if it had originally resided on the local
>>> hard drive.
>>
>> Yes, but not all java application
On 2011-04-25, Hal Vaughan wrote:
--- SNIP ---
> A couple points here. I checked the source code for the Dynamic Tree Demo
> that is used as a JNLP demo. Now I will admit I haven't been using Java for
> a couple years and have some catching up to do (I think I was using Java 5,
> but know I'v
Liam, I've read your posts on this thread, but I'm replying in kind of a
reverse order -- or skipping the earlier ones if my comments on those make it
in here.
On Apr 24, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:08:47 +, Liam O'Toole
On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:08:47 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
>> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>
Java technology offers a standard way of doing that: Java Web Start.
It is possible to deploy a third-party application using a JNLP
file[1].
>>>
>>> Yes
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:08:47 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Java technology offers a standard way of doing that: Java Web Start.
>>> It is possible to deploy a third-party application using a JNLP
>>> file[1].
>>
>> Yes but no, that's a completely different appro
On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:02:19 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
>> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>>> I have a jar file (the application is a fax client for HylaFAX) that
>>> needs to be accessed/launched over the network because by doing so I
>>> only have to update one
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:16:15 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> I think Linux might give better control over things like permissions.
>> In my case, the server will be running Debian 6.x.
>
> Now you mention... I've got a samba share on a Debian server (this is in
> another network), and windows clients a
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:28:01AM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:03:00PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> >> I now know I can use smbclient to read files on an SMB share without
> >> having to mount it, but I need to do mo
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:02:19 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
>> I have a jar file (the application is a fax client for HylaFAX) that
>> needs to be accessed/launched over the network because by doing so I
>> only have to update one file and then all the clients are auto
On 2011-04-24, Camaleón wrote:
> I have a jar file (the application is a fax client for HylaFAX) that
> needs to be accessed/launched over the network because by doing so I only
> have to update one file and then all the clients are automatically
> updated.
Java technology offers a standard wa
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:13:17 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> I still don't know if it's a security measure or just a technical
>> barrier that needs the use of another applications to be bypassed. In
>> fact, I can run a ".jar" file over "smb://" using
On Apr 23, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:03:00PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>> I now know I can use smbclient to read files on an SMB share without having
>> to mount it, but I need to do more than that.
>>
>> I want to be able to access either Java classes or a
On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 04/23/2011 12:59 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>> I'm also looking into creating a temporary mount point and deleting when
>> it's done, but if there's a crash or something, that temporary mount point
>> would remain, unless I put it in /t
On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:04:20 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
>> On Apr 23, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
Does Java handle the SMB protocol on its own? I know I can't list a
directory that way with ls, even with the Samba client packag
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:03:00PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I now know I can use smbclient to read files on an SMB share without having
> to mount it, but I need to do more than that.
>
> I want to be able to access either Java classes or an executable on a shared
> volume on a server without
On 04/23/2011 12:59 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I'm also looking into creating a temporary mount point and deleting
when it's done, but if there's a crash or something, that temporary
mount point would remain, unless I put it in /tmp or something radical
like that.
Couldn't you copy the file inste
On Apr 23, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 04/23/2011 12:04 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>> I don't have to use SMB, I could have the server use NFS as well, but I
>> can't find anything about reading an NFS share unless it's mounted. As best
>> I can tell, unless you use a program
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:04:20 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Does Java handle the SMB protocol on its own? I know I can't list a
>>> directory that way with ls, even with the Samba client package
>>> installed.
>>
>> Good question.
>>
>> Nowadays it
On 04/23/2011 12:04 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I don't have to use SMB, I could have the server use NFS as well, but
I can't find anything about reading an NFS share unless it's mounted.
As best I can tell, unless you use a program like smbclient, scp, ftp,
or rsync, there is no way to read any net
On Apr 23, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:42:56 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:03:00 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
I need a way, on Linux, to access files on a network sha
On 23/04/11 12:44, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:42:56 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:03:00 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
I need a way, on Linux, to access files on a network share, which
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:42:56 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:03:00 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> I need a way, on Linux, to access files on a network share, which
>>> could be SMB or NFS (or something else) with
Hi,
Hal Vaughan wrote:
Does Java handle the SMB protocol on its own? I know I can't list a directory
that way with ls, even with the Samba client package installed.
Yeah, I tried that too.
I was thinking if I could list the files, then I might try to do a
symbolic link.
It seems odd that
On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:03:00 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> I need a way, on Linux, to access files on a network share, which could
>> be SMB or NFS (or something else) without mounting the volume. For
>> example, if I'm on System A and
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:03:00 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
(...)
> I need a way, on Linux, to access files on a network share, which could
> be SMB or NFS (or something else) without mounting the volume. For
> example, if I'm on System A and I have an executable on System B, and
> it's on a network
Hal Vaughan put forth on 4/22/2011 12:03 PM:
> I now know I can use smbclient to read files on an SMB share without having
> to mount it, but I need to do more than that.
>
> I want to be able to access either Java classes or an executable on a shared
> volume on a server without having to mount
35 matches
Mail list logo
