Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-11 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi Phil, > Thanks Richard, that looks like the best solution. They even > have a mailing list. I have have really enjoyed using docker for such issues - mix&match useland as you like it - without interfering with you "main" distribution and without any performance overhead. Br, Clemens Br, Cle

Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-10 Thread Phil Endecott
Richard Hector wrote: Another option is to switch to using the pgdg repo for 9.6: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt Thanks Richard, that looks like the best solution. They even have a mailing list. Cheers, Phil.

Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-09 Thread Teemu Likonen
Phil Endecott [2019-07-08T22:24:17+01] wrote: > Indeed, not upgrading to Buster is a possibility. Also upgrading > PostgreSQL to version 11 is a possibility. I think I understand the > issues with each of those options, but I don't have a good > understanding of the issues with trying to keep pg-9

Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-09 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 08 iul 19, 22:24:17, Phil Endecott wrote: > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > Is upgrading to buster a necessity? Stretch will be supported by Debian > > for one more year and probably some more by the LTS effort. > > Indeed, not upgrading to Buster is a possibility. Also upgrading PostgreSQL

Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-08 Thread Richard Hector
On 9/07/19 9:24 AM, Phil Endecott wrote: > Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> On Lu, 08 iul 19, 20:02:36, Phil Endecott wrote: >>> Dear Experts, >>> >>> Does anyone have any advice about the possibility of upgrading >>> systems from Stretch to Buster, but keeping Postgresql-9.6 for >>> the time being? >> >>

Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-08 Thread Phil Endecott
Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Lu, 08 iul 19, 20:02:36, Phil Endecott wrote: Dear Experts, Does anyone have any advice about the possibility of upgrading systems from Stretch to Buster, but keeping Postgresql-9.6 for the time being? Is upgrading to buster a necessity? Stretch will be supported by D

Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-08 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 08 iul 19, 20:02:36, Phil Endecott wrote: > Dear Experts, > > Does anyone have any advice about the possibility of upgrading > systems from Stretch to Buster, but keeping Postgresql-9.6 for > the time being? Is upgrading to buster a necessity? Stretch will be supported by Debian for one m

Re: Upgrading to Buster but keeping Postgresql-9.6

2019-07-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Phil Endecott: > > Does anyone have any advice about the possibility of upgrading > systems from Stretch to Buster, but keeping Postgresql-9.6 for > the time being? With previous Debian releases you always had to migrate your cluster to the new Postgres version manually. The new packages are inst