|> But i still got the error about can finding vg_maingroup which i
|> believe is my main filesystem.
I strongly suspect that you are trying to boot a kernel which does not
include LVM support. (Partly because I had very similar problems in
upgrading to 2.6.29 from 2.6.22 and this was the reaso
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:27 PM, thveillon.debian <
thveillon.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Joey L wrote :
> > I think i did everything and this is a standard configuration - I did
> > not do anything too crazy !
> > Again - all this is software raid --- the /boot is raid1 and the other
> > volum
Joey L wrote :
> I think i did everything and this is a standard configuration - I did
> not do anything too crazy !
> Again - all this is software raid --- the /boot is raid1 and the other
> volumes are software raid5 The Raid5 has LVM filesystems.
>
> here is fdisk -l :
>
> thor:/home/mjh# fd
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:29:05PM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, thveil...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> > thveillon.debian wrote :
> > >
[snip]
> >
> > Sorry, please ignore my advice to load dm-mod in the initrd, reading the
> > whole thread I saw you are running on software
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, thveil...@gmail.com wrote:
> thveillon.debian wrote :
> >
> > I see nothing that strikes me as odd in your conf, outside of the fact
> > that you only have a single user entry for your new kernel.
> > I think you need to add lvm mapper module to the initrd, echo dm-
thveillon.debian wrote :
>
> I see nothing that strikes me as odd in your conf, outside of the fact
> that you only have a single user entry for your new kernel.
> I think you need to add lvm mapper module to the initrd, echo dm-mod to
> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules like you did for md-mod and rai
Joey L wrote :
>
> Tom - thanks for the points..but need more help !! please
>
> I did as you said -
> 1. echo -e "raid1\nmd_mod\nraid456" >> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
> 2. update-initramfs -u -k 2.6.29
>
> and i saw that the modules all loaded successfully.
> But i still got the error that i
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:22 PM, thveillon.debian <
thveillon.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Joey L wrote :
> > Tom - thanks for the reply -
> > Do you think that is the issue ???
> > I am running mirrored drives for /boot. I can not boot off of lvm.
> > I have the rest of my drives on software
Joey L wrote :
> Tom - thanks for the reply -
> Do you think that is the issue ???
> I am running mirrored drives for /boot. I can not boot off of lvm.
> I have the rest of my drives on software raid5 and i have created lvm
> volume groups and put my / filesystem allong with everything else on th
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Joey L wrote:
> >
>> >
>> fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version -mykernel --revision 1
>> kernel-image kernel-headers
>>
>>
>> Change the "mykernel" string and revision number to differentiate your
>> builds.
>>
>> You are booting from a lvm it seems, may
>
> >
> >
> fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version -mykernel --revision 1
> kernel-image kernel-headers
>
>
> Change the "mykernel" string and revision number to differentiate your
> builds.
>
> You are booting from a lvm it seems, maybe with root on lvm. Do you have
> a separate /boot ? A
Joey L a écrit :
>
> make-kpkg -rfakeroot --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
> sudo dpkg -i ../linux-image-2.6.29custom1.0_deb
>
> Maybe that should sort things out. Let me know if you face further
> problems.
>
>
>
>
> Sorry - i tried to run that command but it g
>
>
> make-kpkg -rfakeroot --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
> sudo dpkg -i ../linux-image-2.6.29custom1.0_deb
>
> Maybe that should sort things out. Let me know if you face further
> problems.
>
Sorry - i tried to run that command but it gave an error - something that
rfakeroot is
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:15:02AM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> True, that will not necessitate a recompile. But, the next time you
> build your kernel, just use
>
> make-kpkg -rfakeroot --initrd --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
>
> Also, to easily make an initramfs, I use update-
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:29:32AM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> > You might want to do add "--initrd" to the list of arguments to
> build
> > the ramdisk, which would load the modules required to mount your
> > drives and read the fi
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:29:32AM -0400, Joey L wrote:
> You might want to do add "--initrd" to the list of arguments to build
> the ramdisk, which would load the modules required to mount your
> drives and read the files etc. That should solve the problem.
>
>Thanks for gettin
>
>
> >
> > make-kpkg clean
> > fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image
>
> You might want to do add "--initrd" to the list of arguments to build
> the ramdisk, which would load the modules required to mount your
> drives and read the files etc. That should solve the problem.
>
> Than
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Joey L wrote:
> I am running debian etch with - Linux thor 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Dec 25
> 21:08:54 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux ; I am running this with Raid 5 and LVM.
>
> I would like to update to 2.6.29 ; I found this article but i am little
> stuck, can you help
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:51:08PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:51:25PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> >>Bill Marcum wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
> I installed Sarge on my machine a while back,
Paul E Condon wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:51:25PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Bill Marcum wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
familiar with my hardware specs and wha
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:51:25PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Bill Marcum wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
> >>familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used genker
On Sarge:
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
kamaraju kusumanchi escreveu:
The OP is using sarge. AFAIK, Sarge does not have linux-image-2.6.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Marcum wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used genkernel (gasp) to
build my kernel. For some reason though it installed a 2.4 kernel instead
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Ian wrote:
> I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not extremely
> familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used genkernel (gasp) to
> build my kernel. For some reason though it installed a 2.4 kernel instead of
> 2.6. How can
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
1) What is genkernel?
It's a Gentoo script for automated kernel generation from source
during the original Gentoo installation. It's distantly comparable to
the scripts in kernel-package, but doesn't require a manual "make
oldconfig" to produce the same effect.
OK, thank you kaja. Sorry about replying directly, gmail doesn't really like the debian mailing list.-- "If practice makes perfect, and no one is perfect, then why practice?"
Ian wrote:
Would that image be the same as if I built the kernel with genkernel?
Keep replies on the list. For instructions on posting to debian-user
please see
http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html
1) What is genkernel?
2) Why do you want to compile the kernel?
3) If you
Ian wrote:
I installed Sarge on my machine a while back, and since I'm not
extremely familiar with my hardware specs and what not I used
genkernel (gasp) to build my kernel. For some reason though it
installed a 2.4 kernel instead of 2.6. How can I upgrade my kernel
with out reinstalling or c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Anita Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>>># apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-powerpc
> [...]
>> ls /boot (see if that new kernel is in there)
>> ls /lib/modules (see if it gave you any modules to go with it)
>
> No no.. This is not intel. It's a Mac
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> Anita Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>>># apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-powerpc
> [...]
>> ls /boot (see if that new kernel is in there)
>> ls /lib/modules (see if it gave you any modules to go with it)
>
> No no.. This is not intel. It's a Macintosh.
>
Anita Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>># apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-powerpc
[...]
> ls /boot (see if that new kernel is in there)
> ls /lib/modules (see if it gave you any modules to go with it)
No no.. This is not intel. It's a Macintosh.
In order to install a new kernel it is the b
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:48:30AM +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:25:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Earlier, I had problems installing Debian on my system because of the
> > > Realtek 8139 ethernet device on my desktop's motherboard. I got round
> > > that
I donm't think the necessary packages are on the cds and such (though
I haven't checked). But I don't see why you don't just build up a
tiny base system with the floppy-based kernel, get apt and your
network working, and then compile a kernel "the debian way" as was
suggested earlier. I think tha
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:25:40PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Earlier, I had problems installing Debian on my system because of the
> > Realtek 8139 ethernet device on my desktop's motherboard. I got round
> > that problem by building my own boot floppy with a newer kernel on
> > it.
>
>
> Earlier, I had problems installing Debian on my system because of the
> Realtek 8139 ethernet device on my desktop's motherboard. I got round
> that problem by building my own boot floppy with a newer kernel on
> it.
Why not just get the sources and use kernel-package to make your own
custom
Firstly I'm moving this to the debian-user list as it's got nothing to do
with KDE.
In future please ask such questions on debian-user, feel free to CC me on
such questions as I maintain the devfsd and lilo packages.
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:11, rikiwarren wrote:
> I've downloaded the kernel-imag
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Matthias G. Imhof wrote:
>I am actually having the same problems as the original poster, but my modultils
>are version 2.4.1 which I must have gotten as a deb file from unstable or
>testing.
>
>Any ideas why modconf 2.4.1 does not see the modules in /lib/modules/2.4.1?
"Matthias G. Imhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any ideas why modconf 2.4.1 does not see the modules in
> /lib/modules/2.4.1? insmod and friends can use these modules.
The directory structure under /lib/modules/2.4*/ has changed. It seems
that modconf isn't modified so that it finds the module
I am actually having the same problems as the original poster, but my modultils
are version 2.4.1 which I must have gotten as a deb file from unstable or
testing.
Any ideas why modconf 2.4.1 does not see the modules in /lib/modules/2.4.1?
insmod and friends can use these modules.
Matthias
--
*
* Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040101 17:44]:
>
> unstable is a symlink to sid now. sid is permanent unstable it will
> never be released, it will never be frozen.
Why is this?
rob
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> Mario Olimpio de Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> >> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> >> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> >> > kernels ne
Mario Olimpio de Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Phil Brutsche wrote:
>> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
>> > kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
>>
>> unstable !
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jon Pennington wrote:
> Phil Brutsche wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> >
> > > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> > > kernels need at leas
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> > kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
>
> unstable != t
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:45:39AM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> can't find any modules anymore. Is there any package that might
> resolve this or should I ins
Phil Brutsche wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> > it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> > kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
>
> unstable != testing
>
> You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> it didn't help me! version in unstable(testing) is still 2.3.11 and 2.4
> kernels need at least 2.3.18 (from Changes).
unstable != testing
You need the modutils from unstable (sid). Keep
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:13:47PM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote:
>
> Most of them are available from woody (you don't have to do a full
> upgrade to woody, just upgrade the required parts). modutils 2.3.18
> isn't available however but I found 2.3.23 somewhere in the pool directory
> and it instal
I found a mail from a few days ago (wasn't in the archives yet?) that solved my
problem:
make sure you have at least the following versions:
> > o Gnu C 2.91.66 # gcc --version
> > o Gnu make 3.77 # make --version
> > o binutils
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:41:38AM -0200, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
> >
> > > I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> > > /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> > > can't find any modules anymore.
> >
> > You simply need a newer version of moduti
On 3 Jan 2001, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> > /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> > can't find any modules anymore.
>
> You simply need a newer version of modutils.
Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> can't find any modules anymore.
You simply need a newer version of modutils.
You could fetch Unstable's (or, is it already in
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:45:39AM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote:
>
> I tried to compile a 2.4 kernel, however it turns out the
> /lib/modules directory has been restructured and now the system
> can't find any modules anymore. Is there any package that might
> resolve this or should I install modu
53 matches
Mail list logo
