-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/02/15 10:36, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> What does "uname -a" report? This should tell you what the running
> kernel version is.
>
> It could be a case of your providing implementing your Virtual
> Private Server using kernel cgroups - e.g. via
Hi
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:14:19PM -0500, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a VPS with a company. The image I initially chose was Debian
> Wheezy. I immediately upgraded to Jessie. I updated the kernel and
> rebooted. However, it seems I can't use iptables:
>
> $ sudo iptables
On 22/02/15 03:14 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
Hi list,
I have a VPS with a company. The image I initially chose was Debian
Wheezy. I immediately upgraded to Jessie. I updated the kernel and
rebooted. However, it seems I can't use iptables:
$ sudo iptables --list
modprobe: ERROR: ../libkmod/l
Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the update,
> and received an error claiming "no space left on device." Normally, I
> would do a force-uninstall for the currently running kernel (freeing
> space), then install the new kernel and reboot. Howeve
On 2015-02-14, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>
>> He said this was an encrypted lvm file system, so I believe there's a
>> few more steps involved (although I really know nothing about it).
>
> No.
>
>> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ResizeEncryptedPartitions
>
> The logical volumes to be resized ar
Curt a écrit :
> On 2015-02-14, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Otherwise, you can extend a mounted ext2/3/4 filesystem on an LVM
>> logical volume. However you cannot reduce an ext mounted filesystem.
>
> He said this was an encrypted lvm file system, so I believe there's a
> few more steps involved (
On 2015-02-14, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>
> Otherwise, you can extend a mounted ext2/3/4 filesystem on an LVM
> logical volume. However you cannot reduce an ext mounted filesystem.
He said this was an encrypted lvm file system, so I believe there's a
few more steps involved (although I really know
Gary Dale a écrit :
>> $ df -h
>> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-root 314M 237M 57M 81% /
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-var 2.7G 318M 2.3G 13% /var
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-usr 8.2G 2.6G 5.2G 34% /usr
>> /dev/mapper/lapsdeb-tmp 360M 2.1M
Iain M Conochie a écrit :
> Having said that, with >100GB disks common now, the fallacy that, just
> because you cannot have a sub 1G / filesystem, that you have to place
> /usr onto that partition, is annoying. In fact, the whole /usr merge to
> me is annoying.
There is no /usr merge requireme
what version of the installer are you using?
if it is an older image i'd try the most recent
before filing bugs.
songbird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lis
Stephen R Guglielmo:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:46:35 +0100
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> Stephen R Guglielmo:
>>> I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
>>> for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant
>>> logs.
>>
>> There's been several complaints about similar
It was until fairly recently general practice to allocate a few hundred
MB to / if /usr and /var were separate. It's only in the last few years
that the size of /lib/modules has really exploded, and /usr now needs
(in practice) to physically live under /.
I once tried to put /lib/modules under i
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:46:35 +0100
Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Stephen R Guglielmo:
> > I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
> > for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant
> > logs.
>
> There's been several complaints about similar issues on this list. I
> am
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:55:42 -0500
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 11/02/15 10:01 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the
> > update, and received an error claiming "no space left on device."
> > Normally, I would do a force-uninsta
On 2015-02-12, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
>> This is good to know. However I don't understand what you get for your
>> money using an encrypted *LVM* file system if the commodity of resizing
>> (or reallocation) is more or less removed from the picture.
>
> Using LVM-on-encryption means that you only n
On Thursday 12 February 2015 11:31:43 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2015 09:46:35 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > > I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
> > > for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant logs.
> >
> > There's been several complaints
On Thursday 12 February 2015 09:46:35 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > I'm not sure why the automatic partitioner didn't provide
> > for enough space for future updates. See below for the relevant logs.
>
> There's been several complaints about similar issues on this list. I am
> not sure whether there we
Taking a look into /lib/modules could tell if any older (possibly dispensible)
kernel versions are present on your system.
Regards,
jvp.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:35:32AM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-02-12, Reco wrote:
> >
> > You're right in the case of conventional LVM. But OP is using an
> > encrypted one, and resizing an encrypted LV is much more complex
> > (it requires lvresize, cryptmount and resize2fs in the right sequence
Stephen R Guglielmo:
>
> I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the update,
> and received an error claiming "no space left on device." Normally, I
> would do a force-uninstall for the currently running kernel (freeing
> space), then install the new kernel and reboot. However,
On 2015-02-12, Reco wrote:
>
> You're right in the case of conventional LVM. But OP is using an
> encrypted one, and resizing an encrypted LV is much more complex
> (it requires lvresize, cryptmount and resize2fs in the right sequence).
> It's presumably possible (never done it personally), but co
Hi.
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:55:42 -0500
Gary Dale wrote:
> The problem is that your / partition only has 314M allocated to it. This
> is ridiculously small. I understand people use LVM because it supposedly
> makes adding more space easier.
You're right in the case of conventional LVM. But OP
On 11/02/15 10:01 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
Hi list,
I updated my apt repo and there was a kernel update. I ran the update,
and received an error claiming "no space left on device." Normally, I
would do a force-uninstall for the currently running kernel (freeing
space), then install the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 03/07/2014 19:33, B a écrit :
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:12 +0200 François Patte
> wrote:
>
>> Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an
>> entry to the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in
>> case...
>
> Doc's
On 07/03/2014 07:28 PM, François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I'd like to install kernel 3.14 on wheezy from backports.
Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an entry to
the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in case...
Tha
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:12 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an entry
> to the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in case...
Doc's on the backport site…
--
There is no doubt that my lawyer is honest. For example, when he
filed
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:50:19PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Michael Pobega writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:16:32PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> >> Now one thing about my system is that mounting /usr will be a bit
> >> awkward, since it is lvm over several raid 5 devices.
Michael Pobega writes:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:16:32PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
>> Now one thing about my system is that mounting /usr will be a bit
>> awkward, since it is lvm over several raid 5 devices.
>>
>> Can anyone think of a way to install a kernel .deb without having
>> /
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:16:32PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Michael Pobega writes:
>
> > What I would do is put a live system on a USB flash drive (System Rescue
> > CD is what I usually use) and mount the unbootable hard drive from
> > within the live system. At that point you could wget
Dan Christensen writes:
> Michael Pobega writes:
>
>> What I would do is put a live system on a USB flash drive (System Rescue
>> CD is what I usually use) and mount the unbootable hard drive from
>> within the live system. At that point you could wget a kernel deb from
>> http://ftp.uk.debian.o
Michael Pobega writes:
> What I would do is put a live system on a USB flash drive (System Rescue
> CD is what I usually use) and mount the unbootable hard drive from
> within the live system. At that point you could wget a kernel deb from
> http://ftp.uk.debian.org onto your old mounted hard dri
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:39:18PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> I have a system running etch. I believe it has this kernel installed:
>
> linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
>
> The motherboard failed a few days ago, and I've just got a new
> motherboard and cpu. However, the m
Ron Johnson writes:
> On 02/11/2009 09:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>> I have a system running etch. I believe it has this kernel installed:
>>
>> linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
>>
>> The motherboard failed a few days ago, and I've just got a new
>> motherboard and cpu. Howe
On 02/11/2009 09:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
I have a system running etch. I believe it has this kernel installed:
linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
The motherboard failed a few days ago, and I've just got a new
motherboard and cpu. However, the machine won't boot.
The new
Ron Farrer wrote:
On Wed, December 15, 2004 13:18, Ron Johnson said:
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Brown wrote:
I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve
them.
Is there any way I can
On Wed, December 15, 2004 13:18, Ron Johnson said:
> On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Brown wrote:
>> I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
>> Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve
>> them.
>>
>> Is there any way I can have apt
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Brown wrote:
> I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
> Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve them.
>
> Is there any way I can have apt check to see if a new kernel version is
> available and
Hello
Jeremy Brown (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I noticed that even if new versions of the kernel are available in the
> Debian repository, "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" won't retrieve
> them.
>
> Is there any way I can have apt check to see if a new kernel version
> is available and if so
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 10:03:10PM -0400 or thereabouts, Adam Aube wrote:
> sda wrote:
>
> > OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only
> > problem is that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0,
> > so I don't have a network on the Debian box.
> >
> >
sda wrote:
> OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only
> problem is that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0,
> so I don't have a network on the Debian box.
>
> Is there any way to fix this? I did modprobe for Realtek (which I believe
> is my card)
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 02:41:30PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from S.D.A.:
> > I've seen that warning before, and perhaps I'm slow, but what goes there
> > exactly, and where in my liloconf do I put it? initrid=(name of my kernel image?)
>
> This is my grub kernel stanza
Incoming from sda:
> OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only
> problem is
> that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0, so I don't
> have a
> network on the Debian box.
>
> Is there any way to fix this? I did modprobe for Realtek (which I believe
OK, did the upgrade and I am booted into a new 2.4.x kernel. The only problem is
that the new kernel, doesn't recognize my ethernet card eth0, so I don't have a
network on the Debian box.
Is there any way to fix this? I did modprobe for Realtek (which I believe is my
card) but there aren't any modu
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 02:41:30PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from S.D.A.:
> > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:36:26PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> > > You'll need to move kernel modules out of the way if the new kernel's
> > > /lib/modules/`uname -r` exists already
Incoming from S.D.A.:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:36:26PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from S.D.A.:
> > >
> > > I originally installed woody, then upgraded to testing. Consequently I never
> > > upgraded my original woody kernel.
> > >
> > > I would like to upgrade my ker
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:36:26PM -0600 or thereabouts, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from S.D.A.:
> >
> > I originally installed woody, then upgraded to testing. Consequently I never
> > upgraded my original woody kernel.
> >
> > I would like to upgrade my kernel to 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386'.
Incoming from S.D.A.:
>
> I originally installed woody, then upgraded to testing. Consequently I never
> upgraded my original woody kernel.
>
> I would like to upgrade my kernel to 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386'. Is it a simple
> manner of just 'aptitude install 'kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386' or are th
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:10:11AM -0700, jack kinnon wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion on the kernel. I could not go online under Linux to
> download anything until the modem is configured in. I just realise that the cd I
> have comes with kernel-source-2.4.18. So I carry out th
J. Silverman escribió:
Hi All,
I am running a Debian like os, called Morphix (www.morphix.org), and I
would like to upgrade the installed kernel to 2.6. I have talked with
the experts of Morphix, and they said it is possible to upgrade, but
only on a hard drive installation, since it is a Live
Hello
Kevin Krumwiede (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I'm new to Debian and only recently set up my first "working" system.
> Following the security advisory today, I attempted to upgrade my
> kernel with 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get upgrade'. It doesn't show
> any updates available. I do have
On 18 Feb 2004 13:13:50, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
> Following the security advisory today, I attempted to
> upgrade my kernel with 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get
> upgrade'. It doesn't show any updates available.
> Could the problem be that there is no version associated
> with the stock kernel?
S
Hi
Thanks to all who helped, networking is working, all I had to do was add
8139too to /etc/modules.
Many thanks,
Simon
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
-
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Hi
>
> The results from lspci are
>
> 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3116
> 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8633 [Apollo Pro266 AGP]
> 00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3147
> 00:11.1 IDE
Simon Windsor wrote:
Hi
I have just upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20-idepci to 2.4.18-k7 and all appears ok apart from networking.
The server has a RealTek 18139 card that works fine for 2.2, using rt18139. There is no equivalent module for the 2.4.18-k7 kernel, and attempts to try 3x59x, ne2k-pci
10)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc.: Unknown device 8d04
- Original Message -
From: "Rus Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Simon Windsor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: Up
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have just upgraded my kernel from 2.2.20-idepci to 2.4.18-k7 and all appears ok
> apart from networking.
>
> The server has a RealTek 18139 card that works fine for 2.2, using rt18139. There is
> no equivalent module for the 2.4.18-k7 kernel,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:44:17AM +0200, Jan Agermose wrote:
> I have been handed over the "control" of a debian server -
> and of couse now it startes to misbehave... (and I know
> nothing about debian - sad to say )
>
> I does not really crash totally, as I can still ping the
> server - but l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 September 2002 12:44 pm, Amir Tal wrote:
> On Monday 09 September 2002 16:26, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> > installation I realized that the kernel is still v
On Monday 09 September 2002 16:26, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
> How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my
> /etc/apt/sources.list file with
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:26:14PM -0400, Srinivas Nyayapati wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just finished net installing Debian 3.0 on my pc. But after
> installation I realized that the kernel is still ver 2.2
> How can I upgrade to ver 2.4.19. I know I can do this by editing my
> /etc/apt/sources.list f
go to the website and find the 2.4.** kernek_image pacjage or do
apt-cache search kernel_image and it will report which one you
need. also you may only need to reboot your computer so that the
new kernel gets loaded.
thanks.
--- Original Message ---
From: "Srinivas Nyayapati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.19.0147 +0100]:
> > Yeah, okay, I was harsh. For that I'm sorry. But on the plus side, it
> > did have the intended effect of stopping a thread in its tracks, and
> > probably gave some people the idea that, just because they don't use
> > something does
On Friday 18 January 2002 04:28 pm, David B Harris wrote:
[snip]
> Yeah, okay, I was harsh. For that I'm sorry. But on the plus side, it
> did have the intended effect of stopping a thread in its tracks, and
> probably gave some people the idea that, just because they don't use
> something doesn't
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:39:53 -0800
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man, i can't believe that you told dman--one of the most unreservedly
> helpful and still modest people on this list--to shut up. that's damn
> near slapping your mama in the face. dude, apologize.
Well, firstly, I can also be a r
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:39:53PM -0800, ben wrote:
| On Friday 18 January 2002 01:22 pm, David B Harris wrote:
| > On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:57:16 -0500
| >
| > dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > Isn't that why I ran "vim /boot/grub/menu.lst" in the first place?
| > > With a configuration as simp
On Friday 18 January 2002 01:22 pm, David B Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:57:16 -0500
>
> dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Isn't that why I ran "vim /boot/grub/menu.lst" in the first place?
> > With a configuration as simple to manage as grub's is, I can't imagine
> > why this would nee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:57:16 -0500
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't that why I ran "vim /boot/grub/menu.lst" in the first place?
With a configuration as simple to manage as grub's is, I can't imagine
why this would need to be automated. (X, yes; sendmail, yes;
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:57:16 -0500
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't that why I ran "vim /boot/grub/menu.lst" in the first place?
> With a configuration as simple to manage as grub's is, I can't imagine
> why this would need to be automated. (X, yes; sendmail, yes; grub,
> not really)
What
> Cant i use a 2.4.x one?
>
> thanks
>
> > > Well, im using Debian 2.2 r5 (just upgraded a while
> > > ago to that)...
This method seems, IMHO, a *much* easier way to go about compiling a new
kernel. Give it a try...
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/tutorials/kernel-pkg.en/index-kernel-pk
g.ht
On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 07:57, dman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:07:48AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> | On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:18:19 -0500
> | dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > Really? Have they figured out how to read my mind and put the config
> | > I want in there?
> |
> | Of course
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:07:48AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
| On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:18:19 -0500
| dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Really? Have they figured out how to read my mind and put the config
| > I want in there?
|
| Of course not.
:-)
| They've done the next best thing and made
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:18:19 -0500
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really? Have they figured out how to read my mind and put the config
> I want in there?
Of course not. They've done the next best thing and made it
configurable.
--
.--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=
--- Camilux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cant i use a 2.4.x one?
>
> thanks
>
>
Note I said a debian kernel package ( read precompiled
and in .deb format ) You can of course compile your
own 2.4.x kernel for potato, but IIRC it takes a bit
of adjustment...There are some instructions and
package
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:30:14PM -0800, Camilux wrote:
| Cant i use a 2.4.x one?
Sure, but you'll have to upgrade your 'modutils', and possible
something else.
-D
--
Folly delights a man who lacks judgement,
but a man of understanding keeps a straight course.
Proverbs 15:21
Cant i use a 2.4.x one?
thanks
On 17 Jan 2002, at 10:23, Charles Baker wrote:
>
> --- Camilux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > Well, im using Debian 2.2 r5 (just upgraded a while
> > ago to that)...
> >
> > again, thanks a lot for all the help..
> >
> > - Camilo
> >
> >
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 15:12, Charles Baker wrote:
> --- Camilux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi ppl, just wanted to know if theres a "Debian" way
> > of upgradind
> > the kernel as well.. or is it still manually
> > downloading, unzipping,
> > etc etc?
> >
> > thanks!
> > Camilo
>
> Debian
--- Camilux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> Well, im using Debian 2.2 r5 (just upgraded a while
> ago to that)...
>
> again, thanks a lot for all the help..
>
> - Camilo
>
>
<>
In that case, the latest kernel package available for
you is 2.2.19. You are using the stable distribu
>
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>
> --- dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:02:49 -0500
> > From: dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: Upgrading Kernel the Debian way?
> &
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:46:38AM +0100, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
| On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 20:02, dman wrote:
| [...]
| > $ fakeroot make-kpkg --config=xconfig --append-to-version=-custom.1
| > --revision=custom.1 kernel_image kernel_doc kernel_headers
| > # dpkg -i ../kernel-image-
for you
isYou can check available packages for your
distribution at:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
--- dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:02:49 -0500
> From: dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: R
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 20:02, dman wrote:
[...]
> $ fakeroot make-kpkg --config=xconfig --append-to-version=-custom.1
> --revision=custom.1 kernel_image kernel_doc kernel_headers
> # dpkg -i ../kernel-image-__.deb
> # vim /boot/grub/menu.lst
Only to say tht in the recent grub ther
--- Camilux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi ppl, just wanted to know if theres a "Debian" way
> of upgradind
> the kernel as well.. or is it still manually
> downloading, unzipping,
> etc etc?
>
> thanks!
> Camilo
>
>
Debian way to compile a new kernel:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:55:28PM -0800, Camilux wrote:
| Hi ppl, just wanted to know if theres a "Debian" way of upgradind
| the kernel as well.. or is it still manually downloading, unzipping,
| etc etc?
# apt-get install kernel-image--
# vim /boot/grub/menu.lst
# reboot
or
# apt-get instal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 January 2002 04:18 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> During the upgrade, I get some scary verbiage that seems to be a
> bit contradictory. If I'm just doing a straight minor-point-level
> upgrade, and have no extra kernel modules, is an overwri
On Mon, 2001-09-10 at 08:24, John Purser wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I installed Woody but the output from uname says that I'm running kernel
> 2.2.19. I'd like to upgrade my Kernel to 2.4. I've run "apt-get
> dist-upgrade" but uname still says I'm running 2.2.19.
>
> QUESTIONS:
> What kernel is
"John Purser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good Morning,
>
> I installed Woody but the output from uname says that I'm running kernel
> 2.2.19. I'd like to upgrade my Kernel to 2.4. I've run "apt-get
> dist-upgrade" but uname still says I'm running 2.2.19.
>
dist-upgrade (and upgrade) won't
> I installed Woody but the output from uname says that
> I'm running kernel 2.2.19. I'd like to upgrade my Kernel
> to 2.4. I've run "apt-get dist-upgrade" but uname still
> says I'm running 2.2.19.
>
> QUESTIONS:
> What kernel is woody supposed to be running? Did I do
> something wrong in the
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 07:24:08AM -0600, John Purser wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I installed Woody but the output from uname says that I'm running kernel
> 2.2.19. I'd like to upgrade my Kernel to 2.4. I've run "apt-get
> dist-upgrade" but uname still says I'm running 2.2.19.
>
> QUESTIONS:
> W
* A. Didit Mifanto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010815 17:43]:
> Hello dpkg-er :
>
> I'm currently using potato 2.2r2 with kernel 2.2.18pre21 and want to upgrade
> to newest
> kernel in potato stable package (2.2.19) and may be kernel 2.4 if possible.
>
> As comparison, in RedHat, I can upgrade kernel
apt-get install kernel-source-2.2.19
cd /usr/src/
make menuconfig; or make xconfig
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg --revision=custom.whateveryouwant kernel_image
cd ../
dpkg -i kernel*19.deb
For more info, read all about kernel-package; make-kpkg
- Original Message -
From: "A. Didit Mifanto" <
> "Daniel" == Daniel Toffetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> I never installed a kernel using the woody mirrors
Daniel> yet. Whenever I upgrade a package using dselect, it simply
Daniel> unpacks it and configures it. I guess whether the
Daniel> installation of a kernel
> Daniel> I've upgraded the default potato kernel to 2.4.3 by
> Daniel> downloading the sources and following the instructions in
> Daniel> the documentation of kernel-package.
>
> Is there a reason you didn't get the latest and greatest (2.4.7)?
2.4.3 was the latest and grea
> "Daniel" == Daniel Toffetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> I've upgraded the default potato kernel to 2.4.3 by
Daniel> downloading the sources and following the instructions in
Daniel> the documentation of kernel-package.
Is there a reason you didn't get the latest and
> I have had Debian 2.1 installed and running in text mode for about a year
> now. I have not played with it much as I prefer to have a working X
> server, hence I have used and maintained several Mandrake systems, which I
> am sick of.
>
> I am stuck in text mode in Debian with a dial up connect
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>kernel upgrades are independent of distribution.
>
>> So that's my goal... what do I do to update to the newest kernel
>> Debian's got on their FTP? =20
>
>If you want to use a compiled image:
>
>$ apt-get install kernel-image
>
>If you prefer t
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:54:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I did an upgrade recently just using apt-get --fix-broken dist-upgrade and I
> figured this would upgrade my kernel as well. Nope.
kernel upgrades are independent of distribution.
> So that's my goal... what do I do t
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 17:54:35 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I did an upgrade recently just using apt-get --fix-broken dist-upgrade and I
> figured this would upgrade my kernel as well. Nope. So that's my goal...
> what do I do to update to the newest kernel Debian's got on their F
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:52:59PM -0800, aphro wrote:
: On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Anthony Green wrote:
:
: ninja >I havent read much about ipchains .. but know how to use ipfwadm, is
: ninja >there a backward compatability?
:
: not much backwards compadiblity, i havent gotten around to learning
: ipch
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Hello,
>
>Ive just updated all the packages from hamm to slink but I also
>want to now upgrade to kernel to 2.2.14 ? ..
>I am running IP Masquerading .. linux box connected to net, local
>network of 10.x.x.x and then a win95 box behind the linux box
>on t
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Anthony Green wrote:
ninja >I havent read much about ipchains .. but know how to use ipfwadm, is
ninja >there a backward compatability?
not much backwards compadiblity, i havent gotten around to learning
ipchains too well yet thats one thing thats kept my servers at 2.0.36
ni
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
