On 2016-06-10, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> How would that work having both packages on my system at the same time;
>> I mean, for example, if I typed 'firefox' in a terminal which flavor
>> would I be likely to launch?
>
> The non-esr version if it is present on your system.
I'm using release, so y
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 18:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> That's because gnome-core in Wheezy depends on iceweasel. Probably
> the
> dependencies of such metapackages won't be changed in Wheezy. If you
> really want to avoid having to install firefox-esr, you could build
> your
> own iceweasel tra
On 2016-06-10 17:14 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2016-06-10, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2016-06-10 08:13 +, Curt wrote:
>>
>>> In order to upgrade iceweasel, apt is asking to install an extra
>>> package, notably firefox-esr, whereas (when) I am running firefox-release.
>>
>> Yes. The switch from
On 2016-06-10, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-06-10 08:13 +, Curt wrote:
>
>> In order to upgrade iceweasel, apt is asking to install an extra
>> package, notably firefox-esr, whereas (when) I am running firefox-release.
>
> Yes. The switch from iceweasel to firefox-esr has been mentioned in t
On 2016-06-10 08:13 +, Curt wrote:
> In order to upgrade iceweasel, apt is asking to install an extra
> package, notably firefox-esr, whereas (when) I am running firefox-release.
Yes. The switch from iceweasel to firefox-esr has been mentioned in the
recent DSA 3600-1 security announcement[1
5 matches
Mail list logo
