> > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy contrib non-free main
> > updates
>
> Assuming that this is all on one line, "updates" is a bogus keyword.
> You probably want something like:
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/de
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:37:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Update-manager's little triangular icon won't go away. If I can
> copy/paste its output:
>
> But I cannot do anything except a screenshot. Why do the gui writers
> saddle us with such broken software?
Any numbe
On 24/12/2014, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> ... for some days. I see on the update-manager icon on gnome-panel it has
> got 47 updates, but when I load the Update Manager window it always
> freezes... :(
>
> I've got Debian Squeeze x86 with this sources.list ->
>
I have Debian 6 amd64 LTS, and have f
sudo aptitude safe-upgrade did the trick!
Thanks for the Debian forums! :)
2014-12-24 13:12 GMT+01:00 Gábor Hársfalvi :
> ... for some days. I see on the update-manager icon on gnome-panel it has
> got 47 updates, but when I load the Update Manager window it always
> freezes... :(
>
> I've got D
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:12:28 -0700, owens wrote:
Please, no html... thanks.
> Running Debian Stable with Gnome. Today I attempted to due a regular
> update using update manager. 1. System seemed to boot normally
> 2. Root authorization of the update manager normal 3. Message "A fatal
> error
- Original Message -
From: ow...@netptc.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: 6/12/2012 4:12:28 PM
Subject: Update Manager
Running Debian Stable with Gnome. Today I attempted to due a regular update
using update manager.
1. System seemed to boot normally
2. Root authorizat
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:23:24 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> On 11/12/2010, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
> Thank you Patrick.
>
> On a casual browse saw Cameleon had also responded. FWIW here are the
> things requested.
Your filtering method is too agressive.
> $ sudo aptitude update
(...)
> squeez
On 11/12/2010, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> For what little it's worth, I'm seeing exactly the same behavior (on a
> regularly updated 'testing' system).
Thank you Patrick.
On a casual browse saw Cameleon had also responded. FWIW here are the
things requested.
$ sudo aptitude update
[sudo] pass
2010/12/11 shirish शिरीष :
> Hi all,
> Since yesterday or the day before I have been getting an Update
> manager error saying 'updates are half or there is some issue'. I
> update the system using
>
> $ sudo aptitude update
> $ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade -y
>
> Of course with the recent discu
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:40:11 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>Since yesterday or the day before I have been getting an Update
> manager error saying 'updates are half or there is some issue'. I update
> the system using
>
> $ sudo aptitude update
> $ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade -y
Better if y
Addition at bottom :-
2010/12/11 shirish शिरीष :
> Hi all,
> Since yesterday or the day before I have been getting an Update
> manager error saying 'updates are half or there is some issue'. I
> update the system using
>
> $ sudo aptitude update
> $ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade -y
>
> Of cours
El 2010-12-05 a las 17:27 -0500, John Lindsay escribió:
(resending to the list)
> Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:20:33 -0500, John Lindsay wrote:
>>
>>
>>> All of a sudden I am getting the following message when I click on the
>>> update manager icon ---
>>>
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> I
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:20:33 -0500, John Lindsay wrote:
> All of a sudden I am getting the following message when I click on the
> update manager icon ---
(...)
I always get asked for root password when there are updates available in
the update manager icon. If you get a "keyring unlock" messag
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:18:47 +0200
claudio wrote:
> update manager
>
> E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with
> MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_jaunty_main_binary-i386_Packages,
> E:La lista dei pacchetti o il file di status non possono es
John Lindsay wrote:
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>>> John
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hi John,
>> Dont use reply to and change the subject of the thread, this does not
>> start a new thread, but goes into the one you are therefore
>> "highjacking". To start a new thread, you have to create a new message.
>> T
John,
I see you are using Thunderbird as am I. Assuming your using the 2
pane view with the preview pane, you can easily click the drop down +
just to the left of the subject to reveal additional header information
and you should see the list's debian-user@lists.debian.org address.. You
shou
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
John
Hi John,
Dont use reply to and change the subject of the thread, this does not start a
new thread, but goes into the one you are therefore "highjacking". To start a
new thread, you have to create a new message.
Thierry
My apologies to the group. I did
>
> John
Hi John,
Dont use reply to and change the subject of the thread, this does not start a
new thread, but goes into the one you are therefore "highjacking". To start a
new thread, you have to create a new message.
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
first: please don't reply to mails to this list if you don't answer to
them. This is annyoing for a lot of people and your mail might go
unnoticed by people who are able to give good answers to your questions.
John Lindsay:
> Is there a problem with the update manager or the sites from which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-07-01 18:16, Stackpole, Chris wrote:
> * I don't know the details about it, I just saw the posting about a week
> ago and thought "huh that's interesting" and went on my way. Sorry for
> not keeping the link. I will look for it again and if I f
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:06:01PM -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I have the same issue on my login. I run Lenny, but I don't know when new
> updates are available. When I log in as guest, or any other login it gives me
> that orange ball that says there are updates available. I must have turn
>On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
>be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
>box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
>be updated, and it handles the updating.
>
>On a new Lenny install, this is not present. I do have
>something
On Tue July 1 2008, michael wrote:
> > Yeah, but every day I have minor things to update on the other
> > machine, but nothing on this one. And if I go to Synaptic, as
> > I did a few minutes ago, I learn that I have 122M worth of
> > updates to get through
> >
> > So clearly I think there's so
Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
> box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
> be updated, and it handles the updating.
>
> On a new Lenny install, this is not
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:12 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:10:13PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:04 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> > > On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> > > be the Gnome update manager running; I regul
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:10:13PM +0100, michael wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:04 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> > On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> > be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
> > box that pops up on my panel that tells me w
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:04 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
> box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
> be updated, and it handles the updating.
>
>
On Tue February 26 2008, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> ok, I get different output when I do an:
> aptitude update
> apt-get update
> update-manager
>
> I think maybe I am unable to do updates right now. Here is the output of
> each of those commands:
> # aptitude reinstall update-manager
> Reading packa
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:05:31AM -0800, Tim Wescott wrote:
>> Default User wrote:
>>> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
>>> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
>>> available updates. Among them w
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:05:31AM -0800, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Default User wrote:
> >I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
> >K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
> >available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the descrip
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:44:09 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > > > sud
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:48:25AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> You were right and I was wrong about directories (I've ceratinly seen
> those 'permission denied' du messages). But since your message
> mentioned files in addition to directories, I carelessly fired off my
> response :).
So in conclusion:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:44 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > > > sudo
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > > sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
> >
> > Won't they have a hard ti
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:52:11 +
Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (15/02/07 22:47), Celejar wrote:
> > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
>
> I think you'll find 'du' complains if you run as a nor
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
>
> Won't they have a hard time with directories and files that are not
> readable by the normal user?
On (15/02/07 22:47), Celejar wrote:
> Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
I think you'll find 'du' complains if you run as a normal user. The
reason being, it needs to descend into directories to gather usage
infor
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:47:37PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:02:31 -0600
> Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Doing "sudo du -BKB /lib64" does indeed show 2793kB in /libc64. Yikes!
> >
> > Doing "sudo dpkg -l libc64*" returns: "No packages found matchi
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:25:16 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> libc6-amd64 is part of the base system (for no particularly good reason
> but all it uses is some disk space), so you probably already had it
> installed.
Yes, I noticed that shortly after my recent install onto a l
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:02:31 -0600
Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Doing "sudo du -BKB /lib64" does indeed show 2793kB in /libc64. Yikes!
>
> Doing "sudo dpkg -l libc64*" returns: "No packages found matching
> libc64*." Since "sudo dpkg -l" returns a list of several hundred (a
Default User wrote:
I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
states is a 64-bit library "meant for AMD64 systems".
Perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Default User wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:03 -0600, Default User wrote:
>> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
>> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
>> available updates. Amon
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:03 -0600, Default User wrote:
> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
> available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
> states is a 64-bit libra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
> Default User wrote:
>> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
>> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
>> available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the desc
Default User wrote:
> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
> available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
> states is a 64-bit library "meant for AMD64 systems".
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
