On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:47:00 +0100
Lisi wrote:
> Is the package you want available in Squeeze backports?
Unfortunately, no. [1]
In another thread of this list I've seen someone suggesting
that /etc/apt/apt.conf has been deprecated, so I've tried creating a
file in /etc/apt/atp.conf.d with the d
On Friday 22 June 2012 17:36:30 Vilius Panevėžys wrote:
> Yes, I'll do that as a fallback, but installing packages the manual way
> looses all the advantages of the package management system. Let's say
> that's an exercise to learn how to use apt along the way, though
> I actually need the newer ve
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:36:30 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:52 + (UTC) Camaleón
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:48:13 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote:
>>
>> > I need eclipse >= 3.7 to use plug-ins that refuse to work with the
>> > eclipse version available in
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:52 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:48:13 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote:
>
> > I need eclipse >= 3.7 to use plug-ins that refuse to work with the
> > eclipse version available in squeeze. So, I'd be happy with the
> > version from testing.
>
> (...
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:48:13 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote:
> I need eclipse >= 3.7 to use plug-ins that refuse to work with the
> eclipse version available in squeeze. So, I'd be happy with the version
> from testing.
(...)
Have you considered in getting the upstream package instead¹? Being a
5 matches
Mail list logo
