On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 05:14:52PM +0200, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
> After the reboot, which went well, I noticed that the new kernel version was
> "held back". An explicit install of the new kernel seemed to succeed, and
> everything seems to work ok now.
Note the differences among "apt upgrade", "a
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 1:04 PM Jesper Dybdal wrote:
>
> On 2023-10-08 12:07, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
> > On 2023-10-08 11:25, Marco M. wrote:
> >> Am 08.10.2023 um 11:09:53 Uhr schrieb Jesper Dybdal:
> >>
> >>> It seems to have a problem with "grub-pc". But I thought that
> >>> grub-pc was only for
On 2023-10-08 11:25, Marco M. wrote:
Am 08.10.2023 um 11:09:53 Uhr schrieb Jesper Dybdal:
It seems to have a problem with "grub-pc". But I thought that
grub-pc was only for BIOS boot, and that by installing the UEFI
version grub-pc would disappear or at least be disabled.
Uninstall grub-pc
Am 08.10.2023 um 12:46:06 Uhr schrieb DdB:
> My understanding is, that it might be dangerous to uninstall grub-pc
> and its dependencies without further precautions.
If a system was installed in UEFI mode, no grub-pc is installed.
If a system is being migrated from BIOS boot to UEFI boot, care mu
Am 08.10.2023 um 13:37:45 Uhr schrieb Jesper Dybdal:
> I tried to simulate it with a "apt-get -s remove grub-pc". It then
> said:
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> grub-pc grub2
>
> Is removing grub2 not a problem? If I do an "aptitude why grub2", it
> says:
That is my EFI syst
On 2023-10-08 12:07, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
On 2023-10-08 11:25, Marco M. wrote:
Am 08.10.2023 um 11:09:53 Uhr schrieb Jesper Dybdal:
It seems to have a problem with "grub-pc". But I thought that
grub-pc was only for BIOS boot, and that by installing the UEFI
version grub-pc would disappear or
Am 08.10.2023 um 12:46 schrieb DdB:
> OMG, this looks wrong to me.
Errata:
I apologize for spreading nonsense. My mistake was, that, although most
of my vm's are actually using UEFI, the one, i was testing was NOT.
Sorry for my confusion. Disregard my earlier statements ...
Am 08.10.2023 um 11:33 schrieb Marco M.:
> Specifying a block device for boot loader installation is only needed
> for BIOS boot and not for UEFI boot, so in case of an UEFI system,
> grub-pc isn't needed.
>
OMG, this looks wrong to me. So i went to check in practice, using a
virtual machine, tha
On 2023-10-08 11:25, Marco M. wrote:
Am 08.10.2023 um 11:09:53 Uhr schrieb Jesper Dybdal:
It seems to have a problem with "grub-pc". But I thought that
grub-pc was only for BIOS boot, and that by installing the UEFI
version grub-pc would disappear or at least be disabled.
Uninstall grub-pc if
Am 08.10.2023 um 11:30:13 Uhr schrieb DdB:
> On issuing the update interactively, i could see, that grub was
> prompting for the place to write itself to, which needed interaction.
> After giving the info (like /dev/sda in my case), the upgrade
> succeded. Later, there came more updates, but this
Am 08.10.2023 um 11:09 schrieb Jesper Dybdal:
> This has worked fine since then, with unattended-upgrades succeeding in
> keeping it up-to-date, including kernel upgrades and reboots.
>
> But this morning, unattended-upgrades failed:
Hi, i was having the same problem on several virtual machines,
Am 08.10.2023 um 11:09:53 Uhr schrieb Jesper Dybdal:
> It seems to have a problem with "grub-pc". But I thought that
> grub-pc was only for BIOS boot, and that by installing the UEFI
> version grub-pc would disappear or at least be disabled.
Uninstall grub-pc if you are on an UEFI system.
You ca
12 matches
Mail list logo
