On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:56:04 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:04:19 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to increase the number of open files the sendmail daemon
>>> may have. I have read that inserting a ulimi
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:04:19 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>
>> I am trying to increase the number of open files the sendmail daemon may
>> have. I have read that inserting a ulimit command in the init script is
>> the way to do this.
>
> (...)
>
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:04:19 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> I am trying to increase the number of open files the sendmail daemon may
> have. I have read that inserting a ulimit command in the init script is
> the way to do this.
(...)
I can be wrong but I had understood ulimits (per user/daemo
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:08:59 -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:40:30 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that in bash "ulimit -u" is the same as ash's
>> "ulimit -p", while bash has another meaning for "ulimit -p" ... This
>> makes writing scripts quite difficult
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:40:30 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> I just noticed that in bash "ulimit -u" is the same as ash's
> "ulimit -p", while bash has another meaning for "ulimit -p" ... This
> makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
> ulimit in /bin/sh scripts, only
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:40:30PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> I just noticed that in bash "ulimit -u" is the same as ash's
> "ulimit -p", while bash has another meaning for "ulimit -p" ... This
> makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
> ulimit in /bin/sh scripts,
--begin quoted message from Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf,
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running kde on debian woody.
> Where can I change my resource limits?
> I'm having problems with some programs that I think might be
> caused by having ulimit set to:
>
> 3|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:rbw $ulimit -s
> 8196
> 4|[EMAIL
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:08:33PM -0200, Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf wrote:
> 1) Editing /etc/security/limits.conf, addind the line:
>
> rbw softstack unlimited
Had you tried also increasing the hard limit to unlimited?
--
When we reduce our own liberties to stop terro
On Don, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:31:00 +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> Hello,
lilo,
> I'd like to test an overloaded apache with 2000 httpd processes running
> as nobody on it. However, I can't ulimit the maximum number of open
> file descriptors for "nobody" as well as common users. Is there any way
>
Hi,
not sure exactly, but I've seen soffice suckdown 215M virtual with 96M
resident, while working with big files...
It's a real pig, but still better than Windows atleast
-Jon
To wit, consider that this function, just as 'cd', must be implemented as a
shell
builtin. If it was a program then the value's set wouldn't be able to affect
future
programs which are run.
"David Z. Maze" wrote:
> Stavros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stavros> ianyone knows why i can't find u
Stavros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stavros> ianyone knows why i can't find ulimit in debian potato?
Because it's a builtin in various Bourne-style shells (bash, zsh,
pdksh), and therefore doesn't have its own package?
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://donut.mit.edu/dm
> Normally, limits are not set (ie they're set as the maximum available). If
> the limits are lower than normal:
> 1) either you have lshell installed, and there's a configuration file in etc
> which tells you which are the limits,
yep.. got it.. Thanks a lot.
That's my first encounter with lshe
On Sat, 23 Nov 1996 00:36:14 +0800 Tan Wee Yeh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
g) wrote:
> At least I understand how the prior case has only local
> effect and that the user is limited by the hard limts.
>
> Now... is there anyway to raise the hard limit globally.
Normally, limits are not set (ie they're se
On Sat, 23 Nov 1996 12:13:54 +0800 Tan Wee Yeh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Nov 1996 11:17:22 +0800 Phil wrote:
> > Anyone can lower and raise the soft limits, as long as they remain under
> > the hard limit. Can you be more precise with your problem ?
> >
> I have tried to first
On Sat, 23 Nov 1996 11:17:22 +0800 Tan Wee Yeh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:04:22 +0800 Tan Wee Yeh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ) wrote:
> > > Anyone knows how I can raise the limits?
> > > It doesn't seem to be the problem with Hard/Soft
> > > limits but more like priviledge
On Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:04:22 +0800 Tan Wee Yeh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to raise the ulimit as an ordinary user.
> I don't seem to be able to raise any limit above some
> ceiling, except when I'm root.
>
> Anyone knows how I can raise the limits?
> It doesn't seem to be t
17 matches
Mail list logo
