Re: Trouble with lvreduce on Debian 12

On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 9:48 AM Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > > # lvreduce -L -39G /dev/mapper/debian--vg-home > WARNING: Reducing active logical volume to 408.07 GiB. > THIS MAY DESTROY YOUR DATA (filesystem etc.) > Do you really want to reduce debian--vg/home? [y/n]: y > Size of logical volume debian-

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

Hi Jonathan, By the way, for future reference, one can use the -r option to lvextend / lvreduce which will call the equivalent of resize2fs for you. For filesystems like ext* that don't allow online shrink it will ask you if you want to umount it first. I find it takes some of the guesswork and s

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 06:46:44PM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > On Sunday, October 27th, 2024 at 11:29, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 06:11:45PM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > > > On Sunday, October 27th, 2024 at 02:28, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 05:

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

-- Jonathan Wiebe Our passions are there to drive us to act, not to be the seasoning of our emotional stew. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Sunday, October 27th, 2024 at 11:29, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 06:11:45PM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > > > On Sunda

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 06:11:45PM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > On Sunday, October 27th, 2024 at 02:28, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 05:04:19AM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > > > > > I ran into an issue with my root partition being too small. My plan > > > was to reduce the

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

-- Jonathan Wiebe Our passions are there to drive us to act, not to be the seasoning of our emotional stew. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Sunday, October 27th, 2024 at 02:28, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 05:04:19AM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > > > I ran in

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

gene heskett wrote: > On 10/27/24 10:03, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 05:04:19AM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > > > > I ran into an issue with my root partition being too small. My plan > > > > was to reduce the size of my home partition and increase th

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

On 10/27/24 10:03, Dan Ritter wrote: Geert Stappers wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 05:04:19AM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: I ran into an issue with my root partition being too small. My plan was to reduce the size of my home partition and increase the size of my root partition. Here is what I h

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 05:04:19AM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > > I ran into an issue with my root partition being too small. My plan > > was to reduce the size of my home partition and increase the size of > > my root partition. Here is what I have done: > > > > First,

Re: Trouble with lvreduce and / read-only

On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 05:04:19AM +, Jonathan Wiebe wrote: > I ran into an issue with my root partition being too small. My plan > was to reduce the size of my home partition and increase the size of > my root partition. Here is what I have done: > > First, I rebooted in single user mode. > T

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: >Franco Martelli wrote: >> On 25/07/24 at 15:07, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> > Yeah... I have to use a Private window (Firefox) or an Incognito >> > window (Chrome) to duplicate this. If I'm using my regular browser >> > sessions where I'm logged in to the wiki, I do

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

Franco Martelli wrote: > On 25/07/24 at 15:07, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Yeah... I have to use a Private window (Firefox) or an Incognito > > window (Chrome) to duplicate this. If I'm using my regular browser > > sessions where I'm logged in to the wiki, I don't get that result. > > > > When i

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On 25/07/24 at 15:07, Greg Wooledge wrote: Yeah... I have to use a Private window (Firefox) or an Incognito window (Chrome) to duplicate this. If I'm using my regular browser sessions where I'm logged in to the wiki, I don't get that result. When in editing mode by clicking "Preview" button i

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 20:02:11 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 25/07/2024 19:11, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 18:54:38 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > > > https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=recall&rev=32 > [...] > > I can't quite guess what "text has no left margin

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On 25/07/2024 19:11, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 18:54:38 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=recall&rev=32 [...] I can't quite guess what "text has no left margin" means here. Firefox-115, see the attachment. Notice that "General",

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 18:54:38 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > A space before " <>" combined with 2 empty lines after > cause extra "" closing before following text. So > most of article text has no left margin. > > https://wiki.debian.org/WikiSandBox?action=recall&rev=144 > https://wiki.debian.org

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On 25/07/2024 10:42, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:50:43 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=raw&rev=33 has one empty line after "<>" while rev=22 has 2 empty lines and it may be more significant than a space before "<<". I assume y

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:50:43 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=raw&rev=33 > > has one empty line after "<>" while rev=22 has 2 empty > lines and it may be more significant than a space before "<<". I assume you mean "while rev=32". I removed the

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On 25/07/2024 02:05, Franco Martelli wrote: I'm using firefox-esr version: 115.13.0esr-1~deb12u1 Here I see the TOC not indented (no space before << tag): https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables?action=raw Here instead I see the TOC indented (a space before << tag): https://wiki.debian.org

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On 24/07/24 at 20:15, Greg Wooledge wrote: https://wiki.debian.org/Permissions?action=raw here there's a space before the << tag and, as I said, clicking on the "Preview" button when in edit mode, it didn't help. Well, the table of contents is indented on that page as well. It sounds like you'

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 20:08:08 +0200, Franco Martelli wrote: > On 24/07/24 at 15:34, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > Could anybody tell me what I did wrong? > > You had a leading space before the << tag. That caused the TOC to be > > indented. I removed that. > > Oh, Thank you very much Greg, what

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On 24/07/24 at 15:34, Greg Wooledge wrote: Could anybody tell me what I did wrong? You had a leading space before the << tag. That caused the TOC to be indented. I removed that. Oh, Thank you very much Greg, what confused me it was the page that I took as reference: https://wiki.debian.or

Re: Trouble when editing a Debian wiki page

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 15:19:29 +0200, Franco Martelli wrote: > https://wiki.debian.org/EnvironmentVariables > > The trouble is that the page has lost indentation, the text begins on the > left side of the page. The only part that was indented was the table of contents itself. I fixed that. >

Re: Trouble/bug with initramfs-tools adding encrypted swap partition

Hello Hans, this is exactly what I did. To be precise, I followed this guide [1], with the difference that instead of "crypt" I used the actual name, luks- (Disks thanksfully shows everything relevant). It's not the first time I'm doing this. Yet I experience the errors mentioned. Sure, I'm not usi

Re: Trouble/bug with initramfs-tools adding encrypted swap partition

On 2024-04-23, Richard wrote: > luks-775ea946-6797-4c4d-a042-72924309f3d2 > UUID=775ea946-6797-4c4d-a042-72924309f3d2 /crypto_keyfile.bin > luks,keyscript=/bin/cat > luks-78362aa3-760c-41de-b911-6531b684e3f7 > UUID=78362aa3-760c-41de-b911-6531b684e3f7 /crypto_keyfile.bin > luks,keyscript=/

Re: Trouble/bug with initramfs-tools adding encrypted swap partition

Am Dienstag, 23. April 2024, 22:26:17 CEST schrieb Richard: Hi Richard, this is, what I am doing when this happens: 1. booting into a live system (any new is working, I prefer kali-linux) 2. If you are using encrypted filesystems, open it. But you have to name it like it is named in / etc/crypt

Re: Trouble with OpenSMTPD

On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:36:12 -0500 Paul M Foster wrote: > For reason(s) I don't understand, opensmtpd will not start via > "systemctl start opensmtpd". According to "sudo smtpd -n", the > configuration file passes, but it just won't start. Have you looked to see what systemd has to say? After run

Re: Trouble with nvidia drivers in Debian 12 Bookworm

Solved my own problem: I had to do `apt install linux-headers-cloud-amd64` instead of `apt install linux-headers-amd64` On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:28 PM Sam Clearman wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to get a Tesla T4 working under Debian 12. > > So far I've tried two approaches: > 1. Using the Debian p

Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

David Wright writes: On Fri 25 Nov 2022 at 15:13:48 (+0100), Nathanael Schweers wrote: > We need to know the versions of the (relevant) packages on > your system. Sorry, I have the ones currently in bullseye. I’m afraid I am not at said machine at the moment and won’t be for the weekend.

Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

On Fri 25 Nov 2022 at 15:13:48 (+0100), Nathanael Schweers wrote: > > We need to know the versions of the (relevant) packages on your system. > > Sorry, I have the ones currently in bullseye. I’m afraid I am not at > said machine at the moment and won’t be for the weekend. I’ll post more > next

Re: Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

> We also need to know what happened between the "I recently installed Debian" > statement and your "suddenly 2 days ago Ansible..." statement. I’m not quite sure I follow. I put that in my message to indicate that it was running fine on sid. It still is, in fact, on another machine. Between i

Re: Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

> We need to know the versions of the (relevant) packages on your system. Sorry, I have the ones currently in bullseye. I’m afraid I am not at said machine at the moment and won’t be for the weekend. I’ll post more next week. > BTW you started this thread with "I recently installed Debian Bull

Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, 5:26 PM David Wright wrote: > On Wed 23 Nov 2022 at 20:18:43 (+0100), Nathanael Schweers wrote: > > > It doesn't look like this exact problem is known at > https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aansible+X509_V_FLAG_CB_ISSUER_CHECK+is%3Aissue&type=issues, > but there are a few sug

Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

On Wed 23 Nov 2022 at 20:18:43 (+0100), Nathanael Schweers wrote: > > It doesn't look like this exact problem is known at > > https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aansible+X509_V_FLAG_CB_ISSUER_CHECK+is%3Aissue&type=issues, > > but there are a few suggestions among the matching bugs. > > > One sugge

Re: Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

> It doesn't look like this exact problem is known at > https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aansible+X509_V_FLAG_CB_ISSUER_CHECK+is%3Aissue&type=issues, > but there are a few suggestions among the matching bugs. > One suggestion appears to be that your python module "cryptography" is too > new for

Re: Trouble with ansible and apt. Is this a known problem?

On 21/11/2022 08:59, Nathanael Schweers wrote: Hello people, I recently installed Debian Bullseye on my desktop machine, having previously used Debian sid. So far it all went well.  Yet two days ago, ansible suddenly reported the following message when attempting to use either the `apt` or

Re: Trouble using SDXC 128GB card

Hello all, thanks for the replies to this issue. I currently don't have the time to delve into this any further, but I did format the card in my camera and took a few 100 MB of video on it. The video plays back fine on the camera itself, also after turning the camera off and removing and re-ins

Re: Trouble using SDXC 128GB card

Am Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:41:33 + schrieb Musbur : >I'm using a Lenovo Thinkpad T480s. Recently I bought a SanDisk Extreme >Pro 128GB SDXC card for my digital camera, but I quickly found out that >the system can't work with that card. >. >The camera can format, read and write just fine. Perh

Re: Trouble using SDXC 128GB card

Musbur writes: > According to the specs, the builtin card reader of the T480s is SDXC > compatible. Is there a driver for Linux that can make this card work? > The BIOS of the computer has just been updated a week ago. Is the > hardware just not compatible? As Windows 10 can't access the card ei

Re: Trouble using SDXC 128GB card

On 10/26/21 8:41 AM, Musbur wrote: Hello, I'm using a Lenovo Thinkpad T480s. Recently I bought a SanDisk Extreme Pro 128GB SDXC card for my digital camera, but I quickly found out that the system can't work with that card. It show up as /dev/sdb, I can use fdisk and everything without error, but

Re: Trouble using SDXC 128GB card

On Tue 26 Oct 2021 at 15:41:33 (+), Musbur wrote: > I'm using a Lenovo Thinkpad T480s. Recently I bought a SanDisk Extreme > Pro 128GB SDXC card for my digital camera, but I quickly found out that > the system can't work with that card. It show up as /dev/sdb, I can use > fdisk and everything w

Re: Trouble using SDXC 128GB card

Musbur wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using a Lenovo Thinkpad T480s. Recently I bought a SanDisk Extreme > Pro 128GB SDXC card for my digital camera, but I quickly found out that > the system can't work with that card. It show up as /dev/sdb, I can use > fdisk and everything without error, but when remo

Re: Trouble connecting to wifi, Debian 11

On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 20:05, kaye n wrote: > I've downloaded this > debian-live-11.1.0-amd64-lxqt+nonfree.iso It would add useful information to the conversation if you specify the URL (from where you downloaded it). If you don't tell, we dont know. > Are there no sha512sum for the non-free ve

Re: Trouble connecting to wifi, Debian 11

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:28 AM echo test wrote: > Maybe you should use it because that's where you will find a lot of non > free firmwares. > > Check your kernel logs ($> sudo dmesg) , you may find an explicit reason > why your adapter fails to run properly. > > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 18:36, kay

Re: Trouble connecting to wifi, Debian 11

On Thu 14 Oct 2021 at 00:36:18 (+0800), kaye n wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, 21:26 Peter Ehlert, wrote: > > On 10/13/21 6:14 AM, kaye n wrote: > > > > > > I've installed Debian 11 LXQT in my hard drive. > > > I noticed connman does not automatically run on startup, which is fine. That wouldn't b

Re: Trouble connecting to wifi, Debian 11

Maybe you should use it because that's where you will find a lot of non free firmwares. Check your kernel logs ($> sudo dmesg) , you may find an explicit reason why your adapter fails to run properly. Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 18:36, kaye n a écrit : > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, 21:26 Peter Ehlert,

Re: Trouble connecting to wifi, Debian 11

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, 21:26 Peter Ehlert, wrote: > > On 10/13/21 6:14 AM, kaye n wrote: > > Hi Friends > > > > I've installed Debian 11 LXQT in my hard drive. > > I noticed connman does not automatically run on startup, which is fine. > > > > I manually open Connman. It can detect my usb wifi ada

Re: Trouble connecting to wifi, Debian 11

On 10/13/21 6:14 AM, kaye n wrote: Hi Friends I've installed Debian 11 LXQT in my hard drive. I noticed connman does not automatically run on startup, which is fine. I manually open Connman. It can detect my usb wifi adapter because under Wireless tab, it says Wifi technologies: 1 Found, 

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:59:28PM +0200, Thomas Amm wrote: > On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 16:46 -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark > > [...] > > Regards > > > > Conrats! You have just made it into everybody's kill file. A somewhat friendl

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 16:46 -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark > [...] > Regards > Conrats! You have just made it into everybody's kill file.

Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Lu, 06 sep 21, 16:46:24, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > > Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu: > > Curt writes: > >> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird > >> to compose your email as plain text > > Or even as "normal" HTML. > > If it is trivial to me setting my mail

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On 7/09/21 5:25 am, John Hasler wrote: Curt writes: I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird to compose your email as plain text Curt didn't write that; I did. Please be careful with your attributions. I'm intrigued to know how this mistake happened, however. Were you per

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

On Tuesday, September 07, 2021 12:27:32 PM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > Can you add Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org to your > > whitelist? Or isn't it possible to use Resent-From? > > Thanks, I'll have to look into that -- that would be something I have to do > for / at google and I

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

One or two days after i tried to subscribe using the site, I received a warning from this list saying that several messages were bounced by Yahoo. It also said that if more bounces happen, i may be unsubscribed. So, the subscribing messages i tried to make did not even arrived to my spam folder - i

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

Thanks for the reply, some responses interspersed below: On Tuesday, September 07, 2021 11:07:36 AM David Wright wrote: > On Tue 07 Sep 2021 at 08:49:19 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > -- I don't remember that message very well). > > Probably like: > > "In the last seven days we've seen

Re: Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

On Tue 07 Sep 2021 at 08:49:19 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I occasionally seem to lose other messages (I get the message from the debian- > user lists about about some (small number of) messages beeing undeliverable > in the last day or so (can't remember the term used, and maybe there

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Tue 07 Sep 2021 at 00:20:26 (-0300), Dedeco Balaco wrote: > Em 06/09/2021 23:48, Kenneth Parker escreveu: > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:58 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:46:21PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > > > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the

Partially Solved: OT: Why have I not received any messages from Dedeco (was: Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright))

I asked and then answered my own question -- google decided the messages from Dedeco were spam, with this message when I open one (in google mail): This message seems dangerous Similar messages were used to steal people's personal information. Avoid clicking links, downloading attachments, or

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

Em 07/09/2021 03:28, Andrew M.A. Cater escreveu: > It has been repeated a few times in different > places that you can't jump a release straightforwardly, so it has to > be 9 -> 10 -> 11. > Yes. People in the forum also told me this. But the problem was something else. > Having remade all th

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:20:26AM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > My issue happened (this is my conclusion) because my Debian 9 was not > updated when I followed the steps to change sources.list to those of > Debian 10. This is something that should be added in Debian > documentation, in my opinion.

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:20:26AM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > > Em 06/09/2021 23:48, Kenneth Parker escreveu: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:58 PM Greg Wooledge > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:46:21PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > >

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:58 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:46:21PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark > > background i need, and to make it ignore the (usually default) > > background of color of all HTML messages,

Re: (HTML) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:47 PM Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > > Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu: > > Curt writes: > > I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird > to compose your email as plain text > > Or even as "normal" HTML. > > If it is trivial to me setting my mail man

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:46:21PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark > background i need, and to make it ignore the (usually default) > background of color of all HTML messages, why the people in Debian User > list cannot do it? I will not

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On 06/09/2021 21:50, Dan Ritter wrote: Here is reality: Nobody here is obligated to help you. At all. If we do, it's out of the goodness of our hearts. If we don't, it could be: because we don't know the answer or because you are being rude This is a place where people send questions in plain

Re: (pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu: > > Curt writes: > >> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird > >> to compose your email as plain text > > > > Or even as "normal" HTML. > > > > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the d

(pure text) Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

Em 06/09/2021 14:25, John Hasler escreveu: > Curt writes: >> I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird >> to compose your email as plain text > > Or even as "normal" HTML. > If it is trivial to me setting my mail manager to use the dark background i need, and to make it ig

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

Curt writes: > I suggest you follow the earlier advice, and set Thunderbird > to compose your email as plain text Or even as "normal" HTML. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian

On 06/09/2021 01:01, Dedeco Balaco wrote: No. I do not want to edit emails with the traditional "black over white" area. And I have seen that the colors I send can be ignored. And Thunderbird also sends a pure text message together with the HTML messages I prefer to use. Thank you I will feel

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On 2021-09-06, Dedeco Balaco wrote: >> manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. W: GPG >> error: http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease: The >> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is >> not available: NO_PUBKEY 648ACFD622F3D138 NO

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian (reply to David Wright)

On 6/09/21 1:20 pm, Dedeco Balaco wrote: 3. Tried to do 'apt update' as root, but it does not work. GPG signature error. 21:18:54 [ 0] root@compo: /etc/apt # apt-mark hold firefox-esr firefox-esr-l10n-pt-br thunderbird thunderbird-l10n-pt-br firefox-esr set on hold. firefox-esr-l10n-pt-br set o

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian

On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 09:01:22PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: [...] > I did not receive the Greg answer. The only 3 messages I have in my > folder now are the 2 you sent, and the one I receive for my message: Here's the start of the thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/09/thread

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian

Em 05-09-2021 19:10, piorunz escreveu: > On 05/09/2021 05:27, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > >> What should i do to solve this? > You reposted your question two hours later, so I repost the solution and > CC you as well. I am sorry it was reposted. I had trouble subscribing to the list, using the site,

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian

On 05/09/2021 05:27, Dedeco Balaco wrote: What should i do to solve this? You reposted your question two hours later, so I repost the solution and CC you as well. 1. Start by reading the error message. If you can't understand it, then paste it here. As Greg Wooledge already said. 2. Disable

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian

On Sat 04 Sep 2021 at 23:04:49 (-0300), Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > today, i started to upgrade my computer from Debian 9 (Stretch) to > Debian 11 (Bullseye). I had some trouble finding what i wanted to do, a > completely internet based upgrade, if possible. In the Debian > documention, i did not fin

Re: Trouble upgrading Debian

On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 11:04:49PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > So, i should to 2 upgrades: one to Debian 10, and one more to Debian 11. > Fine. And for each one, the steps are: > But after my first edition to sources.list, apt update fails. I have > tried apt-get update to, but it also fails for

Re: trouble with debconf

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 7:54 PM Patrice Duroux wrote: > > I have finally found the source of this trouble. > The absence of /var/lib/cdebconf directory after a bad manipulation. https://packages.debian.org/sid/cdebconf # apt install cdebconf This is a folder to store answers for debconf: http

Re: trouble with debconf

I have finally found the source of this trouble. The absence of /var/lib/cdebconf directory after a bad manipulation. And then even trying to reinstall the debconf package did not (re)create this folder, so any package that rdepends to debconf is falling and also debconf it- self. Which package

Re: Re: trouble with sbuild

I should have stacked the changelog to reads: wiki, manpages, README! Now I will think about a wish report to sbuild package. Thanks

Re: trouble with sbuild

Hi, > $ sbuild-createchroot --chroot-mode=unshare --make-sbuild-tarball ~/.cache/ > sbuild/unstable-amd64.tar.gz unstable $(mktemp -d) > https://deb.debian.org/debian/ > [...] > If I understand well, it is a Perl script that tries to execute some > 'newuidmap' command that is part of the uidmap p

Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy)

On Thu 27 Aug 2020 at 19:44:56 (-0500), R. Ramesh wrote: > I finally decided to move from debian 7 to 10. As a first step I > wanted to upgrade to debian 8 (jesse) > > I changed all ftp.us.debian.org part in /etc/apt/sources.list to > archive.debian.org and tried aptitude update and got the follow

Re: Re: Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy) (solved)

Hello, On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:43:35PM -0500, R. Ramesh wrote: >   My only wish is apt is updated to say something about  the fact > that this is unsupported and users are on their own, but still > provide the download/install without we having to manually > intervene. I think¹ that there are

Re: Re: Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy) (solved)

The expired keys do complicate life but my understanding of the rationale is that the limited key lifetime serves as a sort of contract regarding the integrity of the files. Once a release has been archived it does not fall under that promise from the project any more and so the expired keys serve

Re: Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy) (solved)

Hello, On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:23:33PM -0500, R. Ramesh wrote: > I did think about fresh install, but every method has its drawback. There > are subtle changes that I could not get right in the past, so I chose > upgrade path. Last year I did do a squeeze to stretch upgrade by upgrading to eac

Re: Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy) (solved)

That said, Wheezy is  *way*  too far away from Buster!  For example,  "Update in Place" is likely to fail, because of SystemD changes.  (Heck, I had trouble updating Stretch to Buster in Place, but some of that was User Error). I did think about fresh install, but every method has its drawback

Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy) (solved)

On 2/9/20 3:56 am, Kenneth Parker wrote: My Recommendation, if it isn't too late, is to Install Buster in a separate Partition, and then copy /home files as desired. Reclaim the Wheezy Partition when you are sure that you don't need it anymore. +1 FWIW I'd recommend this course for most ma

Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy) (solved)

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 12:17 PM R. Ramesh wrote: > My attempts to upgrade to Jesse (8) did not work at all and all the > information on the net seem old and not current that Buster is out and > jesse is already archived. Anyway, after looking around, I made ddrescue > copy of the current install di

Re: Trouble with upgrading debian 7 (wheezy) (solved)

My attempts to upgrade to Jesse (8) did not work at all and all the information on the net seem old and not current that Buster is out and jesse is already archived. Anyway, after looking around, I made ddrescue copy of the current install disk (only 64GB, so easy) first and then directly upgra

Re: Trouble with 2011 iMac Sound Card On Debian

Will try, thx. --Keifer On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:26 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 08 iun 20, 16:11:02, Keifer Bly wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > So I installed Debian on a 2011 iMac and it is working ok, except for the > > sound. There is no sound from either the speaker or the headphone jack.

Re: Trouble with 2011 iMac Sound Card On Debian

On Lu, 08 iun 20, 16:11:02, Keifer Bly wrote: > Hi all, > > So I installed Debian on a 2011 iMac and it is working ok, except for the > sound. There is no sound from either the speaker or the headphone jack. > > When I go to the system settings, the volum option is completely greyed out. > > Run

Re: trouble installing gnome

Thanks again for all your help. Once again, at this point, I don't remember how I did it, but I cleared the sources list and put in the Debian repository to download Gnome. It's taking me a lot of effort to wield the code since I'm new at this, and I don't want to cause irreparable damage. Be well!

Re: trouble installing gnome

Thanks to all you for your help! I followed your advice partially and was able to install Gnome. I don’t understand how it worked and I plan to try to figure that out tomorrow. Bedankt! Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 6, 2020, at 6:51 PM, Tom Dial wrote: > >  > >> On 6/6/20 09:14, leonard mori

Re: trouble installing gnome

On 6/6/20 09:14, leonard morin wrote: > Hello, > > I hope all are well. I recently dual-installed debian from a live image > on a usb along with Windows on a new computer. My friend gave me some > guidance, but he is very busy so I don't want to bother him now. > > When I first installed, my w

Re: trouble installing gnome

Marc Shapiro schreef op 2020-06-06 20:30: On 6/6/20 8:58 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:14:13 -0400 leonard morin wrote: Hello leonard, Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: Both instances of that should either be deleted or have an # inserted at the s

Re: trouble installing gnome

On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:30:05 -0700 Marc Shapiro wrote: Hello Marc, >/etc/apt/sources.list file, he is not using the CDs, either. Those >lines were also commented out.  Oops. You are indeed correct - the line wrapping(1) confused me. Thanks for pointing it out. (1) May not be the same as you s

Re: trouble installing gnome

On 6/6/20 8:58 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:14:13 -0400 leonard morin wrote: Hello leonard, Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: Both instances of that should either be deleted or have an # inserted at the start of the line. IMO, the former is prefera

Re: trouble installing gnome

leonard morin schreef op 2020-06-06 17:14: Hello, I hope all are well. I recently dual-installed debian from a live image on a usb along with Windows on a new computer. My friend gave me some guidance, but he is very busy so I don't want to bother him now. When I first installed, my wifi didn't

Re: trouble installing gnome

On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:14:13 -0400 leonard morin wrote: Hello leonard, > Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: Both instances of that should either be deleted or have an # inserted at the start of the line. IMO, the former is preferable. You may also wish to add an onlin

Re: Trouble installing wine on system with foreign arch

On Vi, 01 mai 20, 14:05:42, Dale Harris wrote: > > It was pretty much a fresh install from DVD. I did have some issues > remounting the install DVD from the ILO, but otherwise it pretty normal > install. Was the system fully up-to-date before attempting to install wine32? > It's working now. T

Re: Trouble installing wine on system with foreign arch

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:54 PM Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Apparently your system has received the security update for amd64, but > not for i386. > > My guess is this the reason for the divergence between the amd64 and > i386 on your system and you should look into it. > It was pretty much a fre

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >