On 04/01/14 22:20, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 01 ian 14, 09:06:48, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Wednesday 01 January 2014 01:31:00 Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 01/01/14 11:56, Charlie wrote:
So can someone please tell me how I might do windows safe mode
equivalent?
>>>
>>> There isn't an e
On Mi, 01 ian 14, 09:06:48, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 January 2014 01:31:00 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > On 01/01/14 11:56, Charlie wrote:
> > > So can someone please tell me how I might do windows safe mode
> > > equivalent?
> >
> > There isn't an equivalent mode with Linux. Sorry.
>
> My
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:59:36 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
> Less worse. You meant less worse. :)
Yes, less worse.
Thank you everyone for your suggestions and thank you Scott for your
excellent help. It's much appreciated.
Charlie
--
Registered Linux User:- 329524
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 01/01/14 14:56, Charlie wrote:
>> On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:03:45 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
>>
>>> On 01/01/14 13:07, Charlie wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:31:00 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
[...]
> You can also speed things up consid
On Wednesday 01 January 2014 01:31:00 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 01/01/14 11:56, Charlie wrote:
> > So can someone please tell me how I might do windows safe mode
> > equivalent?
>
> There isn't an equivalent mode with Linux. Sorry.
My knowledge of Windows is scarcely encyclopaedic, but is Windows
On 01/01/14 18:22, Charlie wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 15:21:24 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
>
>
>
>> Don't know if you check here, but your ISP was having some recent
>> problems:- https://www.skymesh.net.au/advisories/
>
> Thanks again Scott.
>
> I think that my ISP is a lot of the problem, b
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 15:21:24 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
> Don't know if you check here, but your ISP was having some recent
> problems:- https://www.skymesh.net.au/advisories/
Thanks again Scott.
I think that my ISP is a lot of the problem, but then is it the IPSTAR
satellite people as well or
On 01/01/14 14:56, Charlie wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:03:45 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
>
>> On 01/01/14 13:07, Charlie wrote:
>>> On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:31:00 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
>>>
>
To see what else (TCP) is using the network:-
$ netstat -t
>>>
>>> Active Internet connec
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:03:45 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
> On 01/01/14 13:07, Charlie wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:31:00 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
> >
> >
Thanks again for the follow up Scott.
> >> Expect very low latency with a satellite connection.
>
> Sorry, I meant "high" latency (lo
On 01/01/14 13:07, Charlie wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:31:00 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
>
>
>
> Thanks for your time Scott
>
>> Expect very low latency with a satellite connection.
Sorry, I meant "high" latency (long wait for a response).
>
> Is 976ms low or is that high?
Low (quick).
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:31:00 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
Thanks for your time Scott
> Expect very low latency with a satellite connection.
Is 976ms low or is that high? Is the lower number like 662ms high?
> >
> > Now the latest is that they want me to run Jessie in the same mode
> > as safe
On 01/01/14 11:56, Charlie wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Running Jessie: 3.11-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.11.10-1 (2013-12-04)
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> Toshiba c500/A00L w8 laptop
>
> I have been having no end of problems with my satellite connection over
> some months and each new support person
12 matches
Mail list logo
