On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:15:15PM -0600, Stefan Srdic wrote:
>
> Just another question, would it be more efficient to use a ramfs instead of a
> tmpfs to mount /tmp onto?
No.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page:
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Stefan Srdic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2. Is it recomended to mount /tmp as a Tmpfs by using the following in
> > fstab:
>
> > tmpfs/tmptmpfsdefaults00
>
> Replace defaults with size= where is some sane limit based
> on the amount of swap and RAM you
Stefan Srdic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Is it recomended to mount /tmp as a Tmpfs by using the following in
> fstab:
> tmpfs/tmptmpfsdefaults00
Replace defaults with size= where is some sane limit based
on the amount of swap and RAM you have.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is
3 matches
Mail list logo
