Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-12 Thread Paul Scott
Oliver Lupton wrote: Paul Scott wrote: I tried both ideas and before finding anything in the strace output I tried safe mode. Then I got the profile manager and was reminded I had seen many variations of this problem before. I can see no lock on the old profile but have created a new one

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-12 Thread Oliver Lupton
Paul Scott wrote: Steve Lamb wrote: Paul Scott wrote: It runs but nothing appears on the screen. I have found nothing relevant in logs or anything with Google. TIA for any diagnostic thoughts. Uhm, ok, what does strace tell ya is going on? Sometimes when something is just inexpl

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-11 Thread Paul Scott
Steve Lamb wrote: Paul Scott wrote: It runs but nothing appears on the screen. I have found nothing relevant in logs or anything with Google. TIA for any diagnostic thoughts. Uhm, ok, what does strace tell ya is going on? Sometimes when something is just inexplicably hung a good

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-11 Thread Steve Lamb
Paul Scott wrote: > I will still continue to use mutt on my old (P-90) laptop. Hey in cases like that I can't argue. :) > It runs but nothing appears on the screen. I have found nothing relevant in > logs > or anything with Google. TIA for any diagnostic thoughts. Uhm, ok, what does

Re: Edit as new; was Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-11 Thread Stephen Patterson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:50:04 +0200, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > --V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:20:27PM -0700, Paul

Re: Edit as new; was Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-10 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:20:27PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > > By `bouncing' the message (generally `b'). > > It doesn't allow me to change the From: address which T-Bird's "Edit as new" > does. Yes, it doesn't, as it sends the mail "as-is". However, you can do a dirty work around; copy the m

Edit as new; was Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-10 Thread Paul Scott
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 09:18:57PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:32:52AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:40:14PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:28:36PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > > > I apologize for the extra reply. I

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-10 Thread Paul Scott
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:32:52AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:40:14PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:28:36PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > > I apologize for the extra reply. I thought the original was > > > delayed because of the From: address

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-10 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:40:14PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:28:36PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > > I apologize for the extra reply. I thought the original was > > delayed because of the From: address. > > > > I also didn't see how to resend the original in mutt (easy t

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-10 Thread Paul Scott
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:28:36PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > I apologize for the extra reply. I thought the original was > delayed because of the From: address. > > I also didn't see how to resend the original in mutt (easy to do > w/ T-Bird) > -- Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-10 Thread Paul Scott
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:23:07PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I seem to have gotten most important things to work. One thing I > > miss that I need is a quick way to set the From: field since I > > have three different email addresses that I send messages from. > > W

Re: Thunderbird not visible

2005-09-10 Thread Paul Scott
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:55:13AM -0700, paul wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:23:07PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I seem to have gotten most important things to work. One thing I > > > miss that I need is a quick way to set the From: field since I > > > have