Re: The truth about PSM and other XPI's

2000-12-13 Thread David Zoll
Damon Muller wrote: > > Quoth Sebastian Silva, > > > The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too > > tight. Mi solution was simply to give it all the permissions it wants > > (of course NOT setuid). Now the other thing is that Mozilla wont > > download the X-install packag

Re: The truth about PSM and other XPI's

2000-12-13 Thread Damon Muller
Quoth Sebastian Silva, > The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too > tight. Mi solution was simply to give it all the permissions it wants > (of course NOT setuid). Now the other thing is that Mozilla wont > download the X-install packages himself. You have to do it for h

Re: The truth about PSM and other XPI's

2000-12-12 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:29:05AM -0600, Joe piman Wreschnig wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:12:20PM -0300, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too tight. > No, they're fine, Mozilla is just horrid about multiuser systems. correct > > Mi s

Re: The truth about PSM and other XPI's

2000-12-12 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:12:20PM -0300, Sebastian Silva wrote: > I tried all this with the Java plugin from sun (yes, I am brave) > I had done this with Mozilla on my previous distro and it had worked, > but now, even though Java seems to be installed, no applets recognize > it. > > For the bra

Re: The truth about PSM and other XPI's

2000-12-12 Thread Joe \"piman\" Wreschnig
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:12:20PM -0300, Sebastian Silva wrote: > The thing is the default permissions for /usr/lib/mozilla are too tight. No, they're fine, Mozilla is just horrid about multiuser systems. > Mi solution was simply to give it all the permissions it wants (of > course > NOT setuid)