Re: The List Standard

2007-05-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > > Andrei Popescu wrote: > > >> Even Outlook can thread (not sure what happens if subject gets changed > > >> though). > > Jim Hyslop wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > It's not true threading, though - it's lumping by subject line. At > > > least,

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-30 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:43:30AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Jim Hyslop wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > Andrei Popescu wrote: > >> Even Outlook can thread (not sure what happens if subject gets changed > >> though). > > > > It's not true threadin

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-23 Thread Paul Johnson
Jim Hyslop wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > Andrei Popescu wrote: >> Even Outlook can thread (not sure what happens if subject gets changed >> though). > > It's not true threading, though - it's lumping by subject line. At > least, that's what it did when

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-23 Thread Paul Johnson
Andrei Popescu wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > Even Outlook can thread (not sure what happens if subject gets changed > though). Outlook can thread. It calls threads "conversations," though. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PRO

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-10 Thread Ted Hilts
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: First: as I understand your guideline I am not to use the reply key but simply address my reply back to the list and it will be automatically added to the descending list. Most email clients have 3 options : Reply, Reply to All, Reply to List. You should use R

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-10 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
> First: as I understand your guideline I am not to use the reply key but > simply address my reply back to the list and it will be automatically > added to the descending list. Most email clients have 3 options : Reply, Reply to All, Reply to List. You should use Reply to List when replying to l

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-10 Thread Paul Johnson
e. So I am confused on this matter. Reply To is not set. You should be using Reply to List instead of Reply or Reply to All when replying. > Also my original subject had [debian-user] as the prefix yet Thunderbird > accepted Re: The list Standard. Subject prefixes aren't done o

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-10 Thread Paul Johnson
Ted Hilts wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > Thunderbird runs with threads beginning with the first issue ins the > subject line and then all successive emails related are tied together in > a descending fashion. I take this to mean that one can first see th

Re: The List Standard

2007-04-09 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
> I am beginning to wonder > what the list standard is on this matter -- or should be. > Does this help? http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/du-guidelines.html raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCR