Be careful here: smail is not sendmail; I think it was largely an
attempt to simplify the configuration while retaining command-line
compatibility.
While exim was really a bit of a rewrite of smail.
So smail might have been a pretty good default.
Someone correct me if I got something wrong above
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Sherohman) writes:
I can remember when smail was the *default* -- that cured me of
using debian defaults! Interesting story.
>
> Actually, given all the Debian-centric info on BIND, I was kind of surprised
> that he wasn't running Debian's default MTA: exim. (OTOH, exim
Hey,
Just wanted to let you know that postfix is the greatest thing that ever hap-
pened to mail. Setup was incredibly easy (i wasn't good enough to get send-
mail working on my server), but postfix was up and *working* in five minutes,
without even reading any doc (which could be a bad thing...)
> > This is a HOOT! Send it to Slashdot or Linux.com; it needs to be published.
>
> /. ? Better send it to debianplanet.org...
>
>
I'm afraid we can't do that. As you know we at Debian take copyright very
seriously so I did a google search on the author and only came up with
this:
JALDHAR H. Vy
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:31:28PM +1000, Damon Muller wrote:
...
>
> Although a real man would have been running qmail and courier-imap...
>
Nah, real men run sendmail. For the same reason real men don't program
in Pascal.
Dima
--
E-mail dmaziuk at bmrb dot wisc dot edu (@work) or at crosswin
Hi Kent!
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Kent West wrote:
> This is a HOOT! Send it to Slashdot or Linux.com; it needs to be published.
/. ? Better send it to debianplanet.org...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the La
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Damon Muller wrote:
> >
> > Although a real man would have been running qmail and courier-imap...
> >
Bleh, qmail? Try postfix for something with a sane license and a sane
upstream, no obnoxious install paths, and easily as secur
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Damon Muller wrote:
> I've got to say, this is the first 100+ line message I've read on the
> list for ages, and it was worth every prescious second!
>
> We *are* amused :)
Thanks. When I'm trying to avoid real work, I can get very inspired.
>
>
> Although a real man woul
From: Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > shell to /bin/false. For remote access they can use an IMAP client.
> > For the IMAP server I recommend the uw-imapd-ssl package. I've
> > heard the maintainer is very diligent and responsive, not to mention
>
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
a romantic love story.
This is a HOOT! Send it to Slashdot or Linux.com; it needs to be published.
Kent
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> shell to /bin/false. For remote access they can use an IMAP client.
> For the IMAP server I recommend the uw-imapd-ssl package. I've
> heard the maintainer is very diligent and responsive, not to mention
> the only man on earth even more handsome than
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:31:28PM +1000, Damon Muller wrote:
> We *are* amused :)
Extremely so. (I just wish I could forward it to more people without having
to then explain it to them... Guess I need more geek friends.)
>
> Although a real man would have been running qmail and courier-imap..
I've got to say, this is the first 100+ line message I've read on the
list for ages, and it was worth every prescious second!
We *are* amused :)
Although a real man would have been running qmail and courier-imap...
Quoth Jaldhar H. Vyas,
> THE END...OR IS IT?
>
> --
> Jaldhar H. Vyas <[E
13 matches
Mail list logo
