Re: The GNU thing

1999-04-09 Thread fockface dickmeat
> >The key thing is that GCC was responsible for creating Linux. The other >programs would have been written if they didn't already exist. Since they >DID already exist, there was no point in wasting the effort to reinvent >wheels and these other programs were SUPPOSED to be free. Now we see that >

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 09:20:19AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: > : > : 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software > : must display the follo

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: : > : > On 25 Mar 1999, John Hasler wrote: : > : > > : > > Where are you getting this? I know of nothing that requires any such : > > thing. : > : > Tell Stallman that, : : Stallman asks people to consider calling their operating syste

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-26 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
> > On 25 Mar 1999, John Hasler wrote: > > > > > Where are you getting this? I know of nothing that requires any such > > thing. > > Tell Stallman that, Stallman asks people to consider calling their operating system GNU/linux (http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html). Since Linus acknowle

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-26 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: > Where are you getting this? I know of nothing that requires any such > thing. George Bonser writes: > Tell Stallman that, http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/technology/zdnet/story.html?s=n/zdnet/technology/19990325/19990325301 So? This is old news. So RMS has his opinion. I have

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-25 Thread John Hasler
George Bonser writes: > The other programs would have been written if they didn't already > exist. Since they DID already exist, there was no point in wasting the > effort to reinvent wheels and these other programs were SUPPOSED to be > free. Now we see that there is a big giant string attached to

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-25 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > I think this statement is absolute truth. Linux wouldn't exist without > > > GCC, but it certainly could without textutils or shellutils and suchlike. > > > interesting opinion. Maybe you never tried to "dpkg --purge --force-depends > >

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-25 Thread Jonathan Guthrie
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > I think this statement is absolute truth. Linux wouldn't exist without > > GCC, but it certainly could without textutils or shellutils and suchlike. > interesting opinion. Maybe you never tried to "dpkg --purge --force-depends > --force-essential

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-25 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 06:51:49AM -0600, Jonathan Guthrie wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, David B. Teague wrote: > > > > The importance of compilers was one reason I chose to license Linux > > > under the GNU Public License (GPL). The GPL was the license for the > > > GCC compiler. I think that all

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-25 Thread Rick Macdonald
Jonathan Guthrie wrote: > > > > I can't get xemacs-20 to suspend with > > > CNTRL-Z on my computer so I either have to use multiple virtual terminals > > > or do everything under X. You didn't say what it is you need to do when you suspend XEmacs, so this may not help... Since you don't like mul

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-25 Thread Jonathan Guthrie
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Brian Servis wrote: > *- On 24 Mar, Jonathan Guthrie wrote about "Re: The GNU thing" > > I can't get xemacs-20 to suspend with > > CNTRL-Z on my computer so I either have to use multiple virtual terminals > > or do everything under X.

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-24 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 24 Mar, Jonathan Guthrie wrote about "Re: The GNU thing" > > Okay, so emacs is a religion, I can deal with that. I use emacs the > editor quite a bit. However, I can't get xemacs-20 to suspend with > CNTRL-Z on my computer so I either have to use multipl

Emacs Trouble (was Re: The GNU thing)

1999-03-24 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 24 Mar 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote: | | > Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > | Okay, so emacs is a religion, I can deal with that. I use emacs the | > | editor quite a bit. However, I can't get xemacs-20 to suspend with | > | CN

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-24 Thread Jonathan Guthrie
On 24 Mar 1999, Gary L. Hennigan wrote: > Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Okay, so emacs is a religion, I can deal with that. I use emacs the > | editor quite a bit. However, I can't get xemacs-20 to suspend with > | CNTRL-Z on my computer so I either have to use multiple virtu

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-24 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] | Okay, so emacs is a religion, I can deal with that. I use emacs the | editor quite a bit. However, I can't get xemacs-20 to suspend with | CNTRL-Z on my computer so I either have to use multiple virtual terminals | or do everything under X. |

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-24 Thread Jonathan Guthrie
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, David B. Teague wrote: > > The importance of compilers was one reason I chose to license Linux > > under the GNU Public License (GPL). The GPL was the license for the > > GCC compiler. I think that all the other projects from the GNU group > > are for Linux insignificant in co

Re: The GNU thing

1999-03-24 Thread David B. Teague
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, George Bonser wrote: > > I thought the following comment from Linus was interesting. It comes from > an article he wrote at www.linuxworld.com > > ... > The importance of compilers was one reason I chose to license Linux > under the GNU Public License (GPL). The GPL was the