On 7/11/21 9:18 PM, Gunnar Gervin wrote:
>
> How repaired hdd in old osx 8.6 mac i386.
> A live usb with debian 10.9 buster did it asked to change from Bios boot
> to Uefi boot & reinstalled hdd. Laptop works. So now can put distro in
> usb, & try which debian based distro works best on Mac osx 10
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 08:46:18AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> "remind" is the appropriate tool.
> It does NOT rely on anything other than computer being turned on.
> With appropriate script it can "nag" me ;}
> q.v.
> https://manpages.debian.org/buster/remind/remind.1.en.html
> https://dianne
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 07:52:23 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 04/18/2020 05:19 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I can see any *ONE* previous commands by using the up-arrow key.
> > But I need to see the *complete* history. F1 is no "Help".
> > Obviously its stored in a file. Where?
> > TIA
>
> U
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 06:52:23AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> There's one thing I don't understand - erasure of previous history.
> https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/088 states it as:
> >... it overwrites the existing history with the new version.
That's because it reads the history
On Tue 12 Mar 2019 at 19:20:34 -0400, deb wrote:
> Fortunately Brian has blocked me,
Eh? You'll have to explain.
--
Brian.
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>songbird wrote:
...
>> ok, looks like the two versions are the same in
>> the first sector (netinst for i386 and amd64) so
>> the fix should work...
>
> The fix should apply to all Debian i386 and amd64 ISOs which were made
> with isohybrid functionality. The bug was introd
Hi,
i wrote:
> > (It would be embarrassing if a different Thomas was meant.)
songbird wrote:
> context is good... i dislike posting last names to usenet/mailing lists.
Well, germany is full of baby-boomer Thomases. :))
> > http://www.ludd.ltu.se/~ams/tmp/isohdpfx.bin.170324
> i hope the
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> (It would be embarrassing if a different Thomas was meant.)
context is good... i dislike posting
last names to usenet/mailing lists.
> songbird wrote:
>> your recent efforts helped me get an
>> install going via USB stick on this ancient
>> machine (the bug with the
Hi,
(It would be embarrassing if a different Thomas was meant.)
songbird wrote:
> your recent efforts helped me get an
> install going via USB stick on this ancient
> machine (the bug with the cd image not being
> able to find isolinux.bin also was affecting
> the netinst i386 cd-image i had dow
I'll give it a try.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150306130524.ga6...@fok02.laje.edewe.de
On Friday 26 September 2014 16:53:56 Doug wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 09:13 AM, Rajavel wrote:
> I wouldn't listen to that garbage if it was the only radio station in the
> world!
Must you reply to spam. :-( It makes life harder for the filters.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..
On 09/26/2014 09:13 AM, Rajavel wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for your mail. Please keep on listening to Love Guru, only on Radio
> City 91.1FM, Monday to Saturday - 9pm to 1am. You can listen to Love Guru,
> from any part of the world through, Radio City Tamil web radio. The link is
> available in www.
On 9/10/13, Kailash wrote:
> On Thursday 05 September 2013 07:48 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>>> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>
> (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING *
On Thursday 05 September 2013 07:48 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
(gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101
On 9/5/13, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>> >
>> > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
>> > Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
>> >
>> >
* On 2013 05 Sep 05:48 -0500, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
> >
> > (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> > Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
> >
> > Evince error:
> >
> > (evince:15620): Gtk
> Turns out, they both produce almost identical errors. Gedit error:
>
> (gedit:15593): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> Not using units is deprecated. Assuming 'px'.
>
> Evince error:
>
> (evince:15620): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk.css:101:18:
> Not using units i
On 9/5/13, Kailash wrote:
> On Sunday 01 September 2013 08:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>>>
>>> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
>>> been happy since.
>>
On Sunday 01 September 2013 08:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>>
>> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
>> been happy since.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months now
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:47:54 +0200, Conrad Nelson wrote:
On 09/03/2013 03:08 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:24 -0500, Conrad Nelson wrote:
What's wrong with MATE?
It could cause conflicts with packages from official repositories.
Could, could, could. So what? I've seen c
On 09/03/2013 03:08 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:24 -0500, Conrad Nelson wrote:
What's wrong with MATE?
It could cause conflicts with packages from official repositories.
Could, could, could. So what? I've seen conflicts of the same nature in
the official repositories. A
Am 01.09.2013 08:22, schrieb Joel Rees:
> 've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but
> I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over.
> It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either
> netbeans or eclipse regularly.
Most of them can
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:24 -0500, Conrad Nelson wrote:
> What's wrong with MATE?
It could cause conflicts with packages from official repositories.
> Xfce hasn't done anything interesting in years, and I've seen
> big bugs in Xfce that still need fixing that are even more glaring than
> most o
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 11:43 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> Hmm. I think I have seen that kind of thing once, some years ago, but
> not recently. I think it was with a less stable version of LXDE
> (running a Fedora security tools live USB).
I've seen it before too, but don't remember the reason for thi
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:32 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> On 08/31/2013 10:21 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> > "Thod Motte" writes:
> >
> >> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable
> >> as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less
> >> customizable.
> >>
> >> I'm just going to rev
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 02:02 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> http://upmart.org/gedit-menus-example.jpg
That's really odd :(. When using gedit on Xfce (different distros,
including Ubuntu/Debian) it's ok on my machine. I agree there seems to
be some lib(s) missing. Xfce was and for some installs sti
On 09/02/2013 03:38 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 02 September 2013 17:24:56 Conrad Nelson wrote:
I used to actually be a big KDE user. I still like it but I've found
it's gone from being one of the fastest, but still flexible desktop
environments around to being one of the absolute slowest.
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 02 September 2013 17:24:56 Conrad Nelson wrote:
I used to actually be a big KDE user. I still like it but I've found
it's gone from being one of the fastest, but still flexible desktop
environments around to being one of the absolute slowest.
The fast, flexible envir
On Monday 02 September 2013 17:24:56 Conrad Nelson wrote:
> I used to actually be a big KDE user. I still like it but I've found
> it's gone from being one of the fastest, but still flexible desktop
> environments around to being one of the absolute slowest.
The fast, flexible environment is still
On 08/31/2013 06:07 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 07:01 -0400, Thod Motte wrote:
Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and
unstable as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less customizable.
I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
Don't! I
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/2/13, Joel Rees wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
better job for GTK + Qt apps than GNOME did an
On 9/2/13, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> better job for GTK + Qt apps than GNOME did and Mate does. For GNOME and
>>> Mate Qt apps were/are an issue. P
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
>>> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2013 10:21 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> "Thod Motte" writes:
>
>> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable as
>> Windows 95 was in 1997 and less
>> customizable.
>>
>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that d
On 9/1/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
>> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
>> jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between the
On 09/01/2013 02:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
...
>
> I've been looking at geany, and it looks interesting functionally, but
> I'm not at all sold on it. Don't like lots of tool panes all over.
> It's part of the reason I can't quite bring myself to use either
> netbeans or eclipse regularly.
>
...
A
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 02:15 -0700, Weaver wrote:
> On Sat, August 31, 2013 11:19 pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > There are a lot of other good (and also lots of bad) DEs, but Xfce4 is
> > the DE that is most similar to GNOME2 + stable + in official
> > repositories of Debian and many other distros. I s
On Sat, August 31, 2013 11:19 pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> There are a lot of other good (and also lots of bad) DEs, but Xfce4 is
> the DE that is most similar to GNOME2 + stable + in official
> repositories of Debian and many other distros. I suspect the OP wants
> GNOME2, so recommending KDE (a goo
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 12:54:07 +1000
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> >> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
> >
> > Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
> > been happy since.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months n
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>>
>> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
>> been happy since.
>
> I find it adequate; ~8months now; I a
There are a lot of other good (and also lots of bad) DEs, but Xfce4 is
the DE that is most similar to GNOME2 + stable + in official
repositories of Debian and many other distros. I suspect the OP wants
GNOME2, so recommending KDE (a good DE) or recommending Fluxbox and LXDE
(good DEs too) isn't goo
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 12:54 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> But gnome apps aren't configuring properly; in particular, in the menu
> bar of gedit (and I've seen it elsewhere I think), all the menus are
> jammed up against each other - no nice spacing between them. Anyone
> know what I ought to inst
On Sat, August 31, 2013 8:14 pm, taz man wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Joe Pfeiffer
>> Sent: 09/01/13 02:21 AM
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: Thanks
>>
>> "Thod Motte" writes:
>>
>> &
> - Original Message -
> From: Joe Pfeiffer
> Sent: 09/01/13 02:21 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Thanks
>
> "Thod Motte" writes:
>
> > Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable as
> > Wi
On 9/1/13, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
>
> Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
> been happy since.
I find it adequate; ~8months now; I am however reasonable with the command line.
I don't like mousepad
"Thod Motte" writes:
> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and unstable as
> Windows 95 was in 1997 and less
> customizable.
>
> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
Another vote for xfce. I switched to it quite a while ago, and have
been h
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 07:01:42 -0400
"Thod Motte" wrote:
> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and
> unstable as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less customizable.
>
> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
Instead of shooting the upgrade, how about
> Xfce isn't GNOME 2, but it's ok.
Yeah! XFCE is great. Tried it, too, on my netbook. It is fast and well usable.
I also was very pleased with LXDE, which is also very lightweight and highly
usable. In fact, I still could not find a decision, which one is better or
faster. So I did the bst thin
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 07:01 -0400, Thod Motte wrote:
> Thanks to debian and Gnome 3 for making my desktop as buggy and
> unstable as Windows 95 was in 1997 and less customizable.
>
> I'm just going to revert to squeeze, that desktop actually worked.
Don't! Install Xfce, IMO the best DE that can b
On 01 May 2013, staticsafe wrote:
> On 5/1/2013 3:27, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> >
>
> If you need any help, feel free to subscribe to freebsd-questions[0].
>
> [0] - http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>
Yes, thanks - already done that. I'm enjoying my exploration of Fr
On Wed, 1 May 2013 09:40:28 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
Hello Chris,
>I think the point is that it has nothing to do with age.
Ah, I see.
Obviously, I'm not as wise as I am old. :-)
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately a
On 5/1/2013 3:27, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 01 May 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Hugo,
>>>
mine neither
>>>
>>> Are you saying that you don't take
On 01 May 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500 Hugo Vanwoerkom
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello Hugo,
> >
> > >mine neither
> >
> > Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or
> > deve
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:14:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Hello Hugo,
>
> >mine neither
>
> Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or
> developer's morality (insofar as it's possible to know their mo
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:19:36 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hello Hugo,
>mine neither
Are you saying that you don't take into consideration a company's or
developer's morality (insofar as it's possible to know their moral
stance) when choosing a product/app/whatever?
--
Regards _
/ )
John Hasler wrote:
Siard writes:
AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
manufacturers/developers.
That has not been my experience.
John Hasler writes:
> Siard writes:
> > AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
> > aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
> > the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
> > manufacturers/developers.
>
> That has not
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>I installed Claws-Mail and only the "Fancy" plugin. It works, sort
>of: Format HTML correctly, but doesn't show images. Config problem?
>Don't know. Yet.
Yes. Even if the "Load images" option is set to yes, there are
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:36:53 +0200
Siard wrote:
Hello Siard,
>AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
>aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
>the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
>manufacturers/developers.
W
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:36:25 -0700,Alan Ianson
wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100
> > Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700
> > > Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Patrick,
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:47:01 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100
> Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700
> > Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Hello Patrick,
> >
> > >Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
> > >Haven't gott
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:08:16 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 04/29/2013 10:10 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400
> > Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> >>> [snip]
> >>> I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:21:54 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> >Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
> >Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork, maybe,
> >they are similar.
Siard writes:
> AFAIK, in general, the older one gets, the less important technical
> aspects become w.r.t. the choices one makes, and the more important
> the extent gets to which one can identify himself with the makers/
> manufacturers/developers.
That has not been my experience.
--
John Hasle
Brad Rogers:
> Siard:
> > But that horrible logo just about put the lid on it. It was a
> > picture of a bird's claw. Then I realized: I'm not of their kind.
> > Back to Sylpheed!
>
> Each to their own, of course. I don't care about logos, etc. If the
> program does what I want, then it's fine
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:41:17 +0200
Siard wrote:
Hello Siard,
>Using Sylpheed, I once tried Claws. For messages marked with a color
>in Sylpheed, the colors got lost. It had a couple of extra bells and
IDK why that happened. I never used colouring in Sylpheed, so can't
even hazard guess for t
Brad Rogers:
> Patrick Bartek:
> > Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
> > Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork,
> > maybe, they are similar.
>
> Look 'n' feel is similar, but one of the reasons for the split was the
> ever increasing difficulty of
On 04/29/2013 10:10 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[snip]
I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself,
instead of me having to switch to a different workspace where
google-chr
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:07:01 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>Sylpheed accepts plugins, too. To what extent I don't know.
>Haven't gotten that far in the manual. Since Claws is a fork, maybe,
>they are similar.
Look 'n' feel is similar, but one of the reasons for the split was the
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:41:50 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself,
> > instead of me having to switch to a different workspace where
> > google-chrome is running all the time. Wou
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:45:46 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard
> > wrote:
> >
> [cut]
> >
> > google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen.
> >
> > I just wish it could open in Sylphe
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard
> wrote:
>
[cut]
>
> google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen.
>
> I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself, instead
> of me having to switch to a different
Lisi Reisz:
> Siard:
> > Check whether you can open chrome + url from the command line like
> > this: $ chrome www.google.com
> > If this works, then chrome '%s' should work with the 'Open' menu
> > option mentioned above.
>
> I type (without the < and >) in the launcher to get
> Crome opened.
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> google-chrome '%s' works. Don't forget the hyphen.
>
> I just wish it could open in Sylpheed's reader window itself, instead
> of me having to switch to a different workspace where google-chrome is
> running all the time.
Instead of google-chrome, you could try midori, an
On 04/28/2013 09:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard
wrote:
Patrick Bartek:
Siard:
[snip]
Wait a minute. In Sylpheed, html messages can be viewed with an
external browser. (Right click > Open...)
An "Open" option is not available. And I can't find any s
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:06 +0200, Siard
wrote:
> Patrick Bartek:
> > Siard:
> >[snip]
> > >
> > > Wait a minute. In Sylpheed, html messages can be viewed with an
> > > external browser. (Right click > Open...)
> >
> > An "Open" option is not available. And I can't find any such
> > option in
On Sunday 28 April 2013 18:36:06 Siard wrote:
> Check whether you can open chrome + url from the command line like this:
> $ chrome www.google.com
> If this works, then chrome '%s' should work with the 'Open' menu option
> mentioned above.
I type (without the < and >) in the launcher to get Cro
Patrick Bartek:
> Siard:
> > Patrick Bartek:
> > > Frank McCormick:
> > > > Sylpheed simply strips all the extraneous codes out and
> > > > displays HTML as text. As far as I know there are no plugins which
> > > > would help it to display HTML as they are supposed to be rendered.
> > > > CLAWS
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:17:11 +0200
Siard wrote:
> Patrick Bartek:
> > Frank McCormick:
> > > Sylpheed simply strips all the extraneous codes out and
> > > displays HTML as text. As far as I know there are no plugins which
> > > would help it to display HTML as they are supposed to be rendered
Patrick Bartek:
> Frank McCormick:
> > Sylpheed simply strips all the extraneous codes out and
> > displays HTML as text. As far as I know there are no plugins which
> > would help it to display HTML as they are supposed to be rendered.
> > CLAWS which is a Sylpheed spinoff does have ways to di
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:06:33 -0400
Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 04/27/2013 07:10 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:48:55 -0400, Rob Owens
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [snip
> >>>
> >>> All that's left to do othe
On 04/27/2013 07:10 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:48:55 -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[snip
All that's left to do other than some final tweaking is deciding
how to handle those HTML e-mails with all their pretty gr
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:48:55 -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > [snip
> >
> > All that's left to do other than some final tweaking is deciding
> > how to handle those HTML e-mails with all their pretty graphics and
> > pictures I get
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:34:28 +1200, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > [snip
> >
> > All that's left to do other than some final tweaking is deciding
> > how to handle those HTML e-mails with all their pretty graphics and
> > pictures
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Thanks to all who helped getting my Yahoo Mail account switched over to a
> standard e-mail client, currently Sylpheed 3.2.0. I've always hated using
> the web interface.
>
> All that's left to do other than some final tweaking i
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Thanks to all who helped getting my Yahoo Mail account switched over to a
> standard e-mail client, currently Sylpheed 3.2.0. I've always hated using
> the web interface.
>
> All that's left to do other than some final tweaking i
On Sat 18 Aug 2012 at 12:35:09 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
[email snipped]
Many apologies for this mail finding its way to the List. My fault
entirely. I thought I had fixed my mutt configuration. Apparently
not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hello Brian, how are you?
Brian Potkin [2012-08-18 0:46 +0100]:
> I hope including your original mail will remind you we have already
> corresponded.
I didn't forget you :-)
> There is only one way to continue: I offer an apology for not getting
> back to you sooner.
No apology necessary -- I'
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:50:53 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2011 18:59:03 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:44:29 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>> > Lisi wrote:
>> >>On Friday 22 July 2011 17:45:32 Camaleón wrote:
>> >>> Better "dmesg | tail -n 30" to get the latest full 30 lines :
On Friday 22 July 2011 18:59:03 Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:44:29 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> > Lisi wrote:
> >>On Friday 22 July 2011 17:45:32 Camaleón wrote:
> >>> Better "dmesg | tail -n 30" to get the latest full 30 lines :-)
> >>
> >>Bingo! Thanks, Camaleón!
> >>I thought I h
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:44:29 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Lisi wrote:
>>On Friday 22 July 2011 17:45:32 Camaleón wrote:
>>> Better "dmesg | tail -n 30" to get the latest full 30 lines :-)
>>
>>Bingo! Thanks, Camaleón!
>>I thought I had HAL, but can't seem to find it.
>>
>>I actually ran your t
Lisi wrote:
>On Friday 22 July 2011 17:45:32 Camaleón wrote:
>> Better "dmesg | tail -n 30" to get the latest full 30 lines :-)
>
>Bingo! Thanks, Camaleón!
>I thought I had HAL, but can't seem to find it.
>
>I actually ran your tests before Camaleón's - but hers cracked it.
So what was the probl
On Saturday 20 February 2010 14:31:25 Lisi wrote:
> exhuberant
Ouch! Typing is _not_ my strongpoint. :-(
s/exhuberant/exuberant
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:/
On Saturday 25 April 2009 23:09:39 leo wrote:
> thanks for the info but I can't access internet ntp servers from my LAN
So why did you ask for ntp servers?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Sunday 26 April 2009 00:09, leo wrote:
> thanks for the info but I can't access internet ntp servers from my LAN
Well you havn't quoted what info you were given.
That aside, ntp uses port 123 UDP, so make sure it's open, outgoing to the
Internet.
Alternatively, if you have ntpdate installed,
In <1240697379.20034.11.ca...@leonardo.softel.cu>, leo wrote:
>thanks for the info but I can't access internet ntp servers from my LAN
Then you will have to ask your LAN administrator(s) for what time servers
you need to use.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasui
On Sunday 21 September 2008 22:51:10 Jochen Schulz wrote:
> > The multi-thread capabilities of blender and (partially) ffmpeg
> > is a good news.
with regard to blender, I found this article confirming that blender
is multi-thread able:
http://wbs.nsf.tc/articles/article8_e.html
which dates to 20
Augustin:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 21:57:04 Jochen Schulz wrote:
>>
>> From my two minute research, it appears Blender can use multiple
>> threads as well, so it's better to use, say, 4*2.6GHz instead of
>> 2*3GHz.
-- snip
> The multi-thread capabilities of blender and (partially) ffmpeg is
+1
user staunch of Debian.
--
Gérard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Debian is rock solid and very usable thanks to you all. Just wanted to say
> >that.
+1
Cant imagine myself using anything but Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
