Thus spake Jason M. Harvey:
> | without any problems. I might try compiling a non-debian 2.4 to see how it
> | goes. (I can still boot the system with my old 2.2 kernel)
> |
> | The way the error messages referes to device 303, does 2.4 refer to devices
> | differently?
> |
>
> as for the devi
| without any problems. I might try compiling a non-debian 2.4 to see how it
| goes. (I can still boot the system with my old 2.2 kernel)
|
| The way the error messages referes to device 303, does 2.4 refer to devices
| differently?
|
as for the device 303 error, i've never ran into that mysel
From: "Jason M. Harvey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Testing to unstable
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:55:51 -0500
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:19:15AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:10:32AM -0500, Roderick Cummings
From: Adam Majer To: Roderick Cummings CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Testing to unstable Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 07:19:15 -0600
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:10:32AM -0500, Roderick Cummings wrote: > > Hi,
> > I had a system running testing for a while, and I de
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:19:15AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:10:32AM -0500, Roderick Cummings wrote:
<<---snip--->>
| > Please append a correct "root=" boot option
<<---snip--->>
is there any change there's no root=/dev/device_name for your root
partition in your lilo.c
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:10:32AM -0500, Roderick Cummings wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a system running testing for a while, and I decided to try unstable.
> I did a dist-upgrade and everything seemed to go fine, however on reboot,
> the new 2.4 kernel won't boot correctly, it fails to mount root
6 matches
Mail list logo
