On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:00:18 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
>>> Who needs old files when new arrive? :)
>
>>Well, it can be years of work that now cannot render with the new
>>version... you will get very angry birds (oops... sorry, I mean "users",
>>angry users) if you update the package to the last ve
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>Did you try to compile tesseract for your Debian version? You can do
>that on the virtual machine, just to see how it goes :-?
OK, I'll give it a try.
>> Who needs old files when new arrive? :)
>Well, it can be years of work that now cannot rende
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:01:59 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>
>>> How do You see which package belongs to which repo?
>>
>>What do you mean? Please, expand that a bit :-)
>
> I meant that if surfing through http/ftp directories of several repos
> like tes
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>> How do You see which package belongs to which repo?
>
>What do you mean? Please, expand that a bit :-)
I meant that if surfing through http/ftp directories of several repos
like testing and stable, then all the packages are mixed - You do not
kn
El 2011-07-07 a las 13:50 -0700, sthu deus escribió:
(resending to the list)
> On 07/07/2011, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:02:40 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> >
> >> Here are:
> >>
> >> https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/tesseract/+sourcepub/1729019/+listing-archive-extra
> >>
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:02:40 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Here are:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/tesseract/+sourcepub/1729019/+listing-archive-extra
>
> plenty of missing in Debian 6 language packages w/ the updated program
> itself.
>
> Can't it be easily backported to D6 ones i
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good time of the day.
Here are:
https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/tesseract/+sourcepub/1729019/+listing-archive-extra
plenty of missing in Debian 6 language packages w/ the updated program
itself.
Can't it be easily backported to D6 ones it is in Ubuntu?
I would li
Hugo Vanwoerkom schrieb:
Hi,
Recently there was a post mentioning tesseract.
Turns out that is an award winning opensource OCR that works!
Hugo
I use it with the gscan2pdf frontend and it works perfectly (at least
for documents in german language)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On 28 Dec 2008, andmalc wrote:
> On Dec 28, 5:10 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> > Yes, tesseract does work well. Here, xsane gives depth 24, but conversion
> > to depth 8 is neither possible nor necessary. Following the docs, I did
>
> The
On Dec 28, 5:10 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
[snip]
> Yes, tesseract does work well. Here, xsane gives depth 24, but conversion
> to depth 8 is neither possible nor necessary. Following the docs, I did
There is an option at the top of the Preferences/Fil
On 21 Dec 2008, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently there was a post mentioning tesseract.
>
> Turns out that is an award winning opensource OCR that works!
>
> I tried it out:
>
> 1. apt-get install tesseract-ocr
> 2. apt-get install tesseract-ocr-eng
> 3. use xsane to scan a page at dpi 300
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2008/12/21 Hugo Vanwoerkom :
>> [3] don't scan at less than 300 dpi
>
> And don't scan above 600 DPI!
>
> I forget which OCR I played with a few years ago, but 300 and 600 DPI
> yielded satisfactory results. 1200 DPI made things _worse_ not bet
2008/12/21 Hugo Vanwoerkom :
> [3] don't scan at less than 300 dpi
And don't scan above 600 DPI!
I forget which OCR I played with a few years ago, but 300 and 600 DPI
yielded satisfactory results. 1200 DPI made things _worse_ not better,
possibly because of noise. This was on Fedora, so maybe it
13 matches
Mail list logo
