Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-08 Thread Tyler Smith
On 2007-05-08, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07 May 2007 23:35:59 GMT > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> What I found, thanks to help from others here (Florian I think it >> was...) was that the directory structure under ~/texmf has to mirror >> that of /usr/share/texmf-

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-08 Thread Micha Feigin
On 07 May 2007 23:35:59 GMT Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-05-07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > >> (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into

Re: TeTex to TeXLive [DONE]

2007-05-07 Thread Amy Templeton
Micha Feigin wrote: > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? > > > > I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > > (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib,

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Tyler Smith
On 2007-05-07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files >> (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into the right directories > > If you have non-standard files you should put them

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Russell L. Harris
* Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070507 13:49]: > ... its time to get with the program and upgrade to TeXLive, since > it actually updates, but I've also heard tell that people experience > big problems when moving over from TeTeX instead of just installing > TeXLive onto a system without any f

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Micha Feigin
On 07 May 2007 19:22:40 GMT Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? > > I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Micha Feigin
On 07 May 2007 19:22:40 GMT Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? > > I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files > (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Tyler Smith
On 2007-05-07, Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > TeX installation. Is there some safe way of moving over? I just jumped in, and the only issue I had was getting my source files (ie. non-standard .bst, .bib, .cls files) into the right directories (another thread on this list in the last mo

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 15:06:50 -0400, Michael Marsh wrote: > On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 >> Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've >> > had to remove some TeX component

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, 7 May 2007 15:06:50 -0400 "Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 > > Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've > > > had to remov

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Michael Marsh
On 5/7/07, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've > had to remove some TeX component or other because it now > won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that m

Re: TeTex to TeXLive

2007-05-07 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:53:18 -0400 Amy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > So recently, occasionally when upgrading (I use Lenny) I've > had to remove some TeX component or other because it now > won't depend on TeTeX. So I suppose that that means it's > time to get with the progr