Re: TOT: Virus reports to the list and x-envelope-to:

2000-09-27 Thread Ian Zimmerman
> "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: George> If you are going to bounce a message, send it to the envelope George> sender or the Errors-To: address. Ethan> looks to me like the only header that seems appropriate is Ethan> Return-Path: Ethan> that is the only real header with

Re: TOT: Virus reports to the list and x-envelope-to:

2000-09-27 Thread Keith G. Murphy
George Bonser wrote: > > > 1) They're replying to the list, rather than to the x-envelope > > sender... whats the difference between my.netvigatr.com errors and these > > virus warnings? > > Well, NOTHING is going to send anything to any x- header address. They > MIGHT send something to an E

Re: TOT: Virus reports to the list and x-envelope-to:

2000-09-27 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 01:57:10AM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > > 1) They're replying to the list, rather than to the x-envelope > > sender... whats the difference between my.netvigatr.com errors and these > > virus warnings? > > Well, NOTHING is going to send anything to any x- header add

Re: TOT: Virus reports to the list and x-envelope-to:

2000-09-27 Thread George Bonser
> 1) They're replying to the list, rather than to the x-envelope > sender... whats the difference between my.netvigatr.com errors and these > virus warnings? Well, NOTHING is going to send anything to any x- header address. They MIGHT send something to an Errors-To: header but SHOULD send t