I wrote:
> My scripts copy all new non-spam to a ham directory which is fed to
> sa-learn every night and then the contents of both the ham and the
> spam directories are deleted.
cbannister writes:
> IIRC, it seems pointless feeding your mail through a spam filter
> if you're downloading it from
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 04:31:17 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last
> > > 10 years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question
> > > might have ha
On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 11:14:15 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:53:31AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 20:31:17 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > > > > Thanks for making me
Hi list,
I am running spamassassin in kmail. As I got several spam from my provider
although there is a spamfilter active, I trained my own spamfilter very well.
There are no false positives or negatives since many years.
However, some spammails still appear (about 2-3 a week), but this is no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:53:31AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 20:31:17 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact
On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 20:31:17 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10
> > > years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might
> > > have
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10
> > years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might
> > have had the seeds of something to help. :)
>
> My scripts copy all new non-spam to a
Gene writes:
> But thats a good idea for genuine ham, but so much crap gets thru I'd
> still have to go thru it and clean it up before sa-learn saw it. Its
> a thankless task for sure.
I have Mailagent delete all high-scoring spam so that I never see it
all. Low-scoring spam is sorted to my spam
On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:57:08 John Hasler wrote:
> > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last
> > 10 years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question
> > might have had the seeds of something to help. :)
>
> My scripts copy all new non-spam to a ham di
On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:01:33 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:35:12 John Hasler wrote:
> > Gene writes:
> > > Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff
> > > via a daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory,
> > > still only catches 10% of
> Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10
> years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might
> have had the seeds of something to help. :)
My scripts copy all new non-spam to a ham directory which is fed to
sa-learn every night and then the conten
Le quintidi 5 floréal, an CCXXIV, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> I feed it ham by moving stuff it should catch to the ham directory so its
> treated as ham on the next runs of sa-learn. I could add a weekly
> sa-learn --ham session, nameing one or more of the cleaner folders from
> the mailing lists
On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:35:12 John Hasler wrote:
> Gene writes:
> > Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff via
> > a daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory, still only
> > catches 10% of it.
>
> Interesting. For me it catches 90%. Do you feed it bot
Gene writes:
> Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff via a
> daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory, still only
> catches 10% of it.
Interesting. For me it catches 90%. Do you feed it both spam and ham?
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI
On 23/04/2016 10:33 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 23 April 2016 07:52:06 Curt wrote:
>> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10915
>>
>> works fine here.
Yes, other pages worked fine too.
> I finally did get to the article, but had to clear it with privacy badger
> and ghostery and no-scr
On Saturday 23 April 2016 08:44:56 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:33:54 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The data these sites collect and sell, gets me 100 new spams every
> > day. 20 or 30 of for erectile disfunction cures that don't work.
> > I'm 81, and been diabetic for 25 + years, I
On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:33:54 Gene Heskett wrote:
> The data these sites collect and sell, gets me 100 new spams every day.
> 20 or 30 of for erectile disfunction cures that don't work. I'm 81, and
> been diabetic for 25 + years, I couldn't reset my since counter if it
> was offered. I don't
On Saturday 23 April 2016 07:52:06 Curt wrote:
> On 2016-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I was blocked, 5 times so far, at the front page of the current
> > issue. I could poke around in the 4 sale areas, but could not
> > access any other content, such as that sublink without signing up.
>
> I w
On 4/23/2016 6:52 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2016-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote:
I was blocked, 5 times so far, at the front page of the current issue. I
could poke around in the 4 sale areas, but could not access any other
content, such as that sublink without signing up.
I was taken to the regular ol
On 2016-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I was blocked, 5 times so far, at the front page of the current issue. I
> could poke around in the 4 sale areas, but could not access any other
> content, such as that sublink without signing up.
I was taken to the regular old front page too (probably be
On Apr 23, 2016 06:27, "Reco" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:23:57 +0100
> Joe wrote:
>
> > 'Proper' serial equipment
> > typically does not go higher than 115kBd, and most wired serial
> > applications need much less than that.
>
> But serial-over-bluetooth gets me 0.5 Mbps :)
>
Being able
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:27:38PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> …TCP/IP inside PPP on a Bluetooth connection is hypthetically
> possible.
>
> Has anyone tried it with a debian system on one end at least?
Yes; around 4 years ago I used to occasionally pair my Nokia E90 and
use it a
On Saturday 23 April 2016 03:36:48 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 23 April 2016 06:04:24 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Unforch for many, its also a link you have to subscribe to
>
> No you don't. I've just tried.
>
> You can, if you wish, once there, become a subscriber to the digital
> version of the
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:23:57 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:53:08 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:27:38 -0700
> > pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> >
> > > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth ,
> > > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:53:08 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:27:38 -0700
> pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth ,
> > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative
> > to RS-232 data cables." Therefore
Hi.
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:27:38 -0700
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth ,
> Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative
> to RS-232 data cables." Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a
> Bluetooth connection is hyptheticall
On Saturday 23 April 2016 06:04:24 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Unforch for many, its also a link you have to subscribe to
No you don't. I've just tried.
You can, if you wish, once there, become a subscriber to the digital version
of the magazine.
Lisi
On Saturday 23 April 2016 00:37:42 shawn wilson wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2016 00:09, wrote:
> > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth ,
> > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative
> > to RS-232 data cables." Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a
> > Bluetooth conne
On Apr 23, 2016 00:09, wrote:
>
> According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth ,
> Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative
> to RS-232 data cables." Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a
> Bluetooth connection is hypthetically possible.
>
> Has anyone tried it with a
29 matches
Mail list logo
