Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-27 Thread eben
On 12/27/24 12:21, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 27 Dec 2024 at 11:27:18 (-0500), eben wrote: >> On 12/27/24 11:18, David Wright wrote: >>> On Sun 22 Dec 2024 at 01:16:31 (-0500), Alex Wahl wrote: Is there any point to worrying about what's masked and disabled if I don't have a specific te

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-27 Thread David Wright
On Fri 27 Dec 2024 at 11:27:18 (-0500), eben wrote: > On 12/27/24 11:18, David Wright wrote: > > On Sun 22 Dec 2024 at 01:16:31 (-0500), Alex Wahl wrote: > >> Is there any point to worrying about what's masked and disabled > >> if I don't have a specific technical reason? The reason I asked > >> it

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-27 Thread eben
On 12/27/24 11:18, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 22 Dec 2024 at 01:16:31 (-0500), Alex Wahl wrote: >> Is there any point to worrying about what's masked and disabled >> if I don't have a specific technical reason? The reason I asked >> it really just because I'm wondering if I accidentally set a uni

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-27 Thread David Wright
On Sun 22 Dec 2024 at 01:16:31 (-0500), Alex Wahl wrote: > Is there any point to worrying about what's masked and disabled > if I don't have a specific technical reason? The reason I asked > it really just because I'm wondering if I accidentally set a unit > to that in the past I shouldn't have; I

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-24 Thread pocket
> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2024 at 7:39 AM > From: "Oliver Schode" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc > > Hi, > > looks like I'm the only one yet as I take it, he wasn't asking about > meanin

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-24 Thread Oliver Schode
Hi, looks like I'm the only one yet as I take it, he wasn't asking about meanings of, or differences between states but rather worries about defaults he may have inadvertently changed. This is about what is essential or required for system operation. > Is there any point to worrying about what's

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-22 Thread Max Nikulin
On 22/12/2024 20:35, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 01:16:31 -0500, Alex Wahl wrote: Is there any point to worrying about what's masked and disabled if I don't have a specific technical reason? The reason I asked it really just because I'm wondering if I accidentally set a unit t

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-22 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 01:16:31 -0500, Alex Wahl wrote: > Is there any point to worrying about what's masked and disabled if I don't > have a specific technical reason? The reason I asked it really just because > I'm wondering if I accidentally set a unit to that in the past I shouldn't > have;

Re: Systemctl masked/disabled/etc

2024-12-22 Thread john doe
On 12/22/24 07:16, Alex Wahl wrote: Is there any point to worrying about what's masked and disabled if I don't have a specific technical reason? The reason I asked > it really just because I'm wondering if I accidentally set a unit to that in the past I shouldn't have; I don't really know what