On 2018-10-02 17:09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
You have the revocation key, don't you?
somewhere safe hopefully
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:11:32PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2018-09-30 18:39, deloptes wrote:
>
> >Here is something I do not get - to encrypt I am asked for password - I
> >guess it is for my secret key, no?
>
> with the mail GPG plugin I never use but tested between 2 email
> identities.
>
On 2018-09-30 18:39, deloptes wrote:
Here is something I do not get - to encrypt I am asked for password - I
guess it is for my secret key, no?
with the mail GPG plugin I never use but tested between 2 email
identities.
you can choose to generate a passphrase when you first make key pair
to
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Encryption requires recipient's public [E] key only. It seems that, in
> addition to encrypting, you are also signing the message. For that you
> need a secret (sub)key that has signing capability [S].
Thank you! It is exactly how it is.
delop...@gmail.com [2018-09-30 19:39:03+02] wrote:
> Teemu Likonen wrote:
>> No. To encrypt you need recipients' public keys which have an encryption
>> capability [E]. Usually there is an encryption subkey. To decrypt you
>> need the secret key which is associated with the public [E] key that was
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> delop...@gmail.com [2018-09-30 01:09:05+02] wrote:
>
>> A key is associated with identity -> the email. With the sub keys you
>> can add more identities.
>
> No. OpenPGP key's user id's (name, comment, email) are with the public
> master key, not with subkeys.
>
OK, sorr
delop...@gmail.com [2018-09-30 01:09:05+02] wrote:
> A key is associated with identity -> the email. With the sub keys you
> can add more identities.
No. OpenPGP key's user id's (name, comment, email) are with the public
master key, not with subkeys.
> Still to encrypt you need the private key.
Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 09:50 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> If all you care about is the public keys for verifying signatures,
>> then I say don't bother trying to proactively sync. Just let each
>> system get keys and key updates from the public keyservers as needed.
>
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 09:50 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> If all you care about is the public keys for verifying signatures,
> then I say don't bother trying to proactively sync. Just let each
> system get keys and key updates from the public keyservers as needed.
OK, that makes sense, and s
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 09:37:43AM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> I get the secret key part. Are you saying to forget about syncing
> public keys (from other's emails) and just let each client download
> those from a public keyserver? If so, I may be over thinking the need to
> sync GnuPG betwee
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 09:16 +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> > Copying .gnupg is simple and easy, but not quite what I'm looking
> > for. Imagine having to copy your email folders or address book from
> > system to system, instead of using something like IMAP. I suppose I
> > cou
Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Copying .gnupg is simple and easy, but not quite what I'm looking for.
> Imagine having to copy your email folders or address book from system to
> system, instead of using something like IMAP. I suppose I could build
> something that uses WebDav to sync .gnupg... I was jus
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 01:45 +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > You may find this article helpful:
> >
> > http://www.connexer.com/articles/openpgp-subkeys
>
> I think that a copy of .gnupg directory would mostly work.
> If OP wants to be able to sign or encrypt with same ke
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> You may find this article helpful:
>
> http://www.connexer.com/articles/openpgp-subkeys
I think that a copy of .gnupg directory would mostly work.
If OP wants to be able to sign or encrypt with same key from more machines,
I agree the link is useful, but overcomplicat
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:33:44AM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What is the best way to maintain consistency of a user's gnupg
> signing/verifying capabilities between 2 or more desktop systems?
>
You may find this article helpful:
http://www.connexer.com/articles/openpgp-subkeys
I
15 matches
Mail list logo
