On Jo, 09 iul 20, 11:02:49, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:56:26AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Sounds pretty risky.
> >
> > Sure. On the other hand, what is the point of using LVM if one is not
> > going to use it to adjust partitions when required?
>
>
On Thu 09 Jul 2020 at 11:02:49 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:56:26AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Sounds pretty risky.
> >
> > Sure. On the other hand, what is the point of using LVM if one is not
> > going to use it to adjust partitions when re
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:56:26AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> > Sounds pretty risky.
>
> Sure. On the other hand, what is the point of using LVM if one is not
> going to use it to adjust partitions when required?
You first have to copy stuff, then delete stuff, then shrink, then move
On Mi, 08 iul 20, 10:20:45, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:35:35AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I was under the impression that LVM is used in particular for its
> > flexibility in adjusting your partitions.
>
> But it won't make disappear a separate /usr p
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 18:07:05 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/7/20 3:35 pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:35:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The short answer is that there simply isn't a good reason to do this
> >>> on
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:07:05PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
A line for /usr is in /etc/fstab using it's UUID ... same as root is referenced
by UUID (both are in the same lvm2 volume group).
Why not just reference it by path?
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:35:35AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> I was under the impression that LVM is used in particular for its
> flexibility in adjusting your partitions.
But it won't make disappear a separate /usr partition "by magic".
> What prevents you from merging '/' and '/usr
On 8/7/20 3:35 pm, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:35:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
>>>
>>> The short answer is that there simply isn't a good reason to do this
>>> on a modern system, and there is no volunteer to donate the enormous
>>> amo
On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:35:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> >
> > The short answer is that there simply isn't a good reason to do this
> > on a modern system, and there is no volunteer to donate the enormous
> > amount of effort required to make
> > something
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 02:35:09 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:45:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >> On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >>> On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >>>
Hi,
On 8/7/20 2:11 am, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:45:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>> On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>>> > * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
>>> >> On Friday 31 Octobe
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:45:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
>> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I
On Wed 08 Jul 2020 at 00:41:12 (+1000), Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
> >> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. B
On 2/11/14 8:58 am, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
>
>> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX=y is
>>> essential.
>>
>> This is what the install gave me. I hav
* David Baron [2014-11-02 00:28 +0200]:
> On Saturday 01 November 2014 22:58:05 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
> > > On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > > It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX
On Saturday 01 November 2014 22:58:05 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
> > On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX=y is
> > > essential.
> >
> > This is what the insta
* David Baron [2014-11-01 19:13 +0200]:
> On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> > It's your decision. MODULES=most should be okay. BUSYBOX=y is
> > essential.
>
> This is what the install gave me. I have not touched it.
> Where do I tell it to mount /usr?
No ne
On Friday 31 October 2014 13:08:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * David Baron [2014-10-31 10:22 +0200]:
> > On Thursday 30 October 2014 19:46:26 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > To mount /usr at boottime you need to boot with an initramfs.
> > >
> > > Therefor you need at least
> > >
>
* David Baron [2014-10-31 10:22 +0200]:
> On Thursday 30 October 2014 19:46:26 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> > To mount /usr at boottime you need to boot with an initramfs.
> >
> > Therefor you need at least
> >
> > ii initramfs-tools 0.118
> > ii util-linux 2.25.2-2
> >
> > which
On Thursday 30 October 2014 19:46:26 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Hans [2014-10-30 10:27 +0100]:
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > completely without starting any flamewars:
> >
> > I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well
> > as /var, /home, /boot and /.
> >
> >
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:30:54 +0100
Peter Nieman wrote:
> On 30/10/14 17:48, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> > Hum... I think I always have seen the installer on "all in one
> > partition (beginners)"?
> > If you have selected this one, then, you should not have problems
> > because of stuf
* Hans [2014-10-30 10:27 +0100]:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> completely without starting any flamewars:
>
> I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well as
> /var, /home, /boot and /.
>
> Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
>
> Due to this profil
On 30/10/14 17:48, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Hum... I think I always have seen the installer on "all in one partition
(beginners)"?
If you have selected this one, then, you should not have problems
because of stuff not mounted.
I guess you're right that there was an option to have ev
Le 30.10.2014 15:35, Peter Nieman a écrit :
On 30/10/14 11:35, David Baron wrote:
I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable
keeping of
/usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition
Debian
installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically
On 10/30/2014 10:14 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Hans wrote:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as
well as /var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
If you want this to work, yo
On Thursday 30 October 2014 15:35:53 Peter Nieman wrote:
> On 30/10/14 11:35, David Baron wrote:
> > I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable
> > keeping of /usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing
> > multi-partition Debian installations have usr on a separate par
On 30/10/14 11:35, David Baron wrote:
I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable keeping of
/usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition Debian
installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically and even recent
installations (not that I like t
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as
> well as /var, /home, /boot and /.
>
> Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
If you want this to work, you need to ensure that /usr is mounted by th
Le Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:27:50 +0100,
Hans a écrit :
> Dear maintainers,
>
> completely without starting any flamewars:
>
> I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as
> well as /var, /home, /boot and /.
>
> Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
>
> D
On 10/30/14, Hans wrote:
>
>> I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable
>> keeping
>> of /usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition Debian
>> installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically and even
>> recent installations (not that I lik
> I think this problem should be resolved. I know the newer desirable keeping
> of /usr on /. However, I would bet 99% of existing multi-partition Debian
> installations have usr on a separate partition. Historically and even
> recent installations (not that I like the partitioning done by the
>
> Hi Hans,
> have a look on this link:
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken/
>
> Best,
> Alex
Yes, yes, I know that. I alreadfy filed a bugreport some weeks ago.
However, it is not really a bug, but more a "failure by design", I think.
Hope, that the ma
On Thursday 30 October 2014 10:27:50 Hans wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> completely without starting any flamewars:
>
> I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well
> as /var, /home, /boot and /.
>
> Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
>
> Due to
On 10/30/2014 10:27 AM, Hans wrote:
Dear maintainers,
completely without starting any flamewars:
I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well as
/var, /home, /boot and /.
Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
Due to this profile, I get a lot of an
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> completely without starting any flamewars:
>
> I am using systemd and I have /usr mounted on a separate partition as well as
> /var, /home, /boot and /.
>
> Additionally /usr, /var and /home are luks encrypted.
>
>
Hello Hans!
Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014, 10:27:50 schrieb Hans:
> Dear maintainers,
You only reach the systemd maintainers by pure luck this way. I know one is
subscribed to debian-user-german, I am not sure about debian-user.
I suggest you use BTS or dig for a debian systemd maintainers ma
36 matches
Mail list logo
